Case law

Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners v. Pulaski County Election Commission

437 S.W.3d 80 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 16, 2014

Devane v. Devane, 581 A.2d 264, 265 (R.I.1990) (per curiam) (citing People v. Lybarger, 700 P.2d 910 (Colo.1985)). See also Martin v. Lowery, 912 So.2d 461 (Miss.2005); Istre v. Meche, 770 So.2d 776 (La.2000). … See Yanmar Co., Ltd. v. Slater, 2012 Ark. 36 , 386 S.W.3d 439 ; Sluder v. Steak & Ale of Little Rock, Inc., 368 Ark. 293 , 245 S.W.3d 115 (2006); In re Estate of Goston v.

Osborne v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 5

94 Ark. 563 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 25, 1910

Boles v. Kelley, supra, is conclusive of this question against the contention of defendants. The burden of proof was on the defendants to show that the assessments were not properly levied. Board of Improvement Dist. v. … Board of Imp. Dist. v. Offenhauser, supra; Kirst v. Street Imp. Dist., 86 Ark. 1 .

Elrod v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 45

171 Ark. 848 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1926

State v. K. C. & Memphis Ry. & Bridge Co., 117 Ark. 606 , 174 S. W. 248 ; Special School District of Texarkana v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 13 of Texarkana, 127 Ark. 341 , 181 S. W. 918 . … Sembler v. Water & Light Imp. Dist., 109 Ark. 90 , 158 S. W. 972 ; Bell v. Phillips, 116 Ark. 167 , 173 S. W. 864 ; Skipper v. Street Imp. Dist. No. 1, 144 Ark. 41 , 221 S. W. 866 .

Taylor v. Clinton

284 Ark. 170 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 3, 1984

Bizzell v. White, Governor, 274 Ark. 511 , 625 S.W.2d 528 (1982). The report from the Board was filed July 13, 1981. … They cite the most recent case, Brown v. Thomson, 103 S.Ct. 2690 (1983), as evidence of the Court’s shift away from the one man, one vote principle toward upholding county lines.

Drew Robinson v. John Felts, Chairman of the Arkansas Parole Board

2025 Ark. 67 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 8, 2025

Nothing in the parole procedures or statutes suggests that Felts could unilaterally call a new hearing and effectuate the declaratory relief sought without approval from the unnamed Board members. See Trammel v. … Gerard, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee. 1 See Thurston v.

Helena-West Helena School District v. Fluker

371 Ark. 574 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 29, 2007

See Goode v. Union County, 189 Ark. 1123 , 76 S.W.2d 100 (1934). … Prior to Goode, in Barber v.

Ark. State Board of Pharmacy v. Gibson Products Co.

239 Ark. 584 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 31, 1965

City of Little Rock v. Newcomb, 219 Ark. 74 , 239 S. W. 2d 750 (1951); Alston v. State, 216 Ark. 604 , 226 S. W. 2d 988 (1950). There is no real dispute about the facts. … This action is of course without prejudice to the Board’s right to file a petition for rehearing. See Tassin v. Reynolds, 222 Ark. 363 , 260 S. W. 2d 462 (1953). Affirmed.

Fayetteville School District No. 1 v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

279 Ark. 89 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1983

See Gerst v. Cain, 388 S.W.2d 168 (Tex., 1965). Even so, such general language unquestionably invests the Board with much discretionary leeway in deciding whether to approve an application such as this one. … Williams v. Buchanan, 86 Ark. 259, 271 , 110 S.W. 1024 (1908). In the absence of any explicit statutory prohibition of a continuance, the Board had the authority to act as it did.

Flynn v. Board of Certified Court Reporter Examiners

372 Ark. 520 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 2008

In Smith v. … . 2 See also Richie v.

McCrory Special School District v. Curtis

174 Ark. 343 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 13, 1927

Crow v. Special School District No. 2, 102 Ark. 401 , 144 S. W. 226 ; and Helvering v. McDougal, 119 Ark. 162 , 177 S. W. 937 . … Browning v. Waidrip, 169 Ark. 261 , 273 S. W. 1032 . This view of the matter was recognized in some of the later cases which we have cited above.

Burke v. Board of Improvement Paving District No. 5

120 Ark. 435 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 1915

Soudan Planting Co. v. Stevenson, 83 Ark. 163 ; Tedford Auto Co. v. … Kieburtz v. Seattle, 146 Pacific 400 .

Board of Directors of Gould Special School District v. Holdtorff

171 Ark. 668 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 5, 1926

The case of Hendrix v. Morris, 127 Ark. 222 , 191 S. … First National Bank of Waldron v. Whisenhunt, 94 Ark. 583 , 127 S. W. 968 .

3 Rivers Logistics, Inc. v. Brown-Wright Post No. 158 of the Am. Legion

548 S.W.3d 137 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 15, 2018

Allen, Jr., appeal the dismissal of their nuisance lawsuit against appellee Brown-Wright Post No. 158 of the American Legion, Department of Arkansas, Inc. (the Legion). … Also, in Winters v.

Felker v. Board of Comm., Paving Dist. No. 13

202 Ark. 304 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1941

Brinkley v. Halliburton, 129 Ark. 334 , 196 S. W. 118 , 1 A. L. R. 1225; Buckner v. Sugg, 79 Ark. 442 , 96 S. W. 184 . … This court said in the case of Osborn, et al. v. Board of Improvement of Paving Improvement Dist. No. 5 of the City of Fort Smith, 94 Ark. 563 , 128 S.

Sanson v. Pullum

273 Ark. 325 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 13, 1981

Counsel rely on Henry v. … Brown testified that he never saw the car before the impact. Thus the jury did not have to rely upon the trooper’s testimony to find that Brown’s negligence cause the accident.

Bateman v. Board of Commissioners of Improvement District No. 1

102 Ark. 306 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 12, 1912

Fitzgerald v. Walker, 55 Ark. 148 . It is insisted, however, by learned counsel for appellee that the case cited above has been overruled by the recent case of Webster v. Ferguson, 95 Ark. 575 . We do not think so. … Wilson v. Blanks, 95 Ark. 496 .

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS v. MATTHEW ANDREWS

535 S.W.3d 616 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 18, 2018

Bd. v. Byers, 2017 Ark. 213 , 521 S.W.3d 459 . This court has held that the Board is an instrumentality of the State and is immune from suit. See Washington Cty. v. … State Comm’r of Labor v. Univ. of Ark. Bd. of Trs., 241 Ark. 399 , 407 S.W.2d 916 (1966). However, the Board contends that this statutorily created waiver violates the Arkansas Constitution.

Mid-South Road Builders, Inc. v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board

328 Ark. 630 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 27, 1997

Dep’t v. Kidder, 326 Ark. 595 , 933 S.W.2d 794 (1996); Wacaser v. Insurance Comm’r, 321 Ark. 143 , 900 S.W.2d 191 (1995). … See, e.g., North Hills Mem’l Gardens v. Simpson, 238 Ark. 184 , 381 S.W.2d 462 (1964); Earp v. Benton Fire Dep’t, 52 Ark. App. 66 , 914 S.W.2d 781 (1996); McCarty v. Board of Trustees, 45 Ark.

Arkansas Tax Commission v. Turley

185 Ark. 31 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 1, 1932

It is first insisted for the reversal of the judgments of the circuit courts that the orders of the boards of equalization were void under the authority of the case of Summers v. Brown, 157 Ark. 509 , 248 S. W. 571 . … It was said in the case of Summers v. Brown, supra, that the equalization board had no power to equalize assessments except -for the year in which they were made.

Genoa Central School District No. 1 v. Board of Education

263 Ark. 393 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 1978

School District No. 70 v. County Board of Education, 185 Ark. 328 , 47 S.W. 2d 606 (1932). … Board of Ed. v. Harrison School Dist. No. 7, 241 Ark. 138 , 406 S.W. 2d 365 (1966), the trial court found that the transfer of 600 to 700 acres from one district to another was substantial in nature.