Case law

Dickson v. Board of Directors

146 Ark. 14 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 8, 1920

from the date of adjournment of said board of assessors sitting as a board of equalization to apply to any court of competent jurisdiction to set aside said assessment list,” etc. … The case comes squarely within the decision of this court in Dickerson v. Tri-County Levee District, 138 Ark. 471 .

Leonard v. Board of Directors of Plum Bayou Levee District

79 Ark. 42 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 7, 1906

An interesting and instructive discussion of this question may be found in the note to Standard Fashion Co. v. Siegel-Cooper Co., 157 N. Y. 60 , 68 Am. St. Rep. 753 -762. where the authorities are collated. … Co. v. Marshall, 136 U. S. 393 .

Salmon v. Board of Directors of Long Prairie Levee District

100 Ark. 366 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 1911

Appellee, Board of Directors of Long Prairie Levee District, instituted actions against appellant, W. R. … Moore v. Board of Directors Long Prairie Levee District, 98 Ark. 113 ; Board of Improvement v. Pollard, 98 Ark. 543 .

Refunding Board of Ark. v. State Hwy Audit Comm'n

189 Ark. 144 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 30, 1934

State v. Hays, 52 Mo. 578 ; Dalafield v. State, 26 Wend. 192 . … But, before the rendition of the opinion in the Keaton case, it had been decided, in the case of State Note Board v. State ex rel. Attorney General, 186 Ark. 605 , 54 S.

Board of Improvement of Sewer District Number 2 v. Moreland

94 Ark. 380 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 14, 1910

Dist. v. Earl, 71 Ark. 4 ; Altheimer v. Board, etc., Plum Bayou Levee Dist., 79 Ark. 229 ; Stiewel v. Fencing District No. 6 of Johnson Co., 71 Ark. 17 ; Little Rock v. Katzenstein, 52 Ark. 107 . … It is alsq insisted that the members of the board are individually liable.

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Rld. v. Board of Commissioners

21 Kan. 309 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1878

After completing the railroad in accordance with the terms of the order of submission, on January 5th, 1877, at a meeting” of the board of county commissioners of said Jefferson county, the plaintiff presented to the board … Rid Co. v. Ryan, 11 Kas. 602 .) The question is, does the agreement to locate the road at or near to Valley Falls, and the erection of a depot thereon, contravene this well-settled doctrine?

Board of Directors of Ross Drainage District v. State

147 Ark. 91 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 17, 1921

This court announced the doctrine in Wood v. … McCaleb v. Coon Run Drainage & Levee District, 190 Ill. 549 ( 60 N. E. 898 ): Rigney v. Fischer, 113 Ind. 313 ( 15 N. E. 594 ); Board of County Commissioners of the County of Jefferson v.

Manley v. Moon

177 Ark. 260 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 1928

McMurray v. Brown, 91 U. S. 257 , 23 L. ed. 321. … We think that the act of 1881 authorizes the sale of any tract, if it was not sold at the time- it was first offered, on the first day of any succeeding term of the county court. ” Brown v. Rushing, 70 Ark. 111 , 66 S.

Pulaski County Board of Equalization v. American Republic Life Insurance

233 Ark. 124 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 13, 1961

Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee Dist. v. Raney, 190 Ark. 75 , 76 S. W. 2d 311 . … Carr v. Young, 231 Ark. 641 , 331 S. W. 2d 701 .

Arkansas Tobacco Control Board v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co.

360 Ark. 32 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 2004

Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573 (1986). … Circuit Court Reversed; Arkansas Tobacco Control Board Affirmed. Brown, J., concurs.

Board of Trustees of Municipal Judges & Clerks Fund v. Beard

273 Ark. 423 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 20, 1981

Appellee, as clerk of the Municipal Court, Criminal Division, of Little Rock, Arkansas, by her letter dated July 24, 1979 addressed to the Appellant, Board of Trustees of Municipal Judges and Clerks Fund, City of Little Rock … Thomas v.

Board of Directors of Jefferson County Bridge District v. Collier

104 Ark. 425 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 1, 1912

Lee Wilson Co. v. Wm. R. Compton Bond Mort. Co., 103 Ark. 452 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Board of Directors, etc., 103 Ark. 127 . … Shibley v. Bridge District, supra; Moore v. Board of Directors, etc., 98 Ark. 113 .

Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District v. Redditt

79 Ark. 154 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 28, 1906

Whissen v. Furth, 73 Ark. 366 . … Co. v. Rowe, 69 Ark. 642 . These statutes meet the constitutional requirements of a jury of twelve and due process, and are valid.

Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District v. Fleming

93 Ark. 490 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1910

The Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District is a quasi corporation, to which is delegated certain powers as a governmental agency. Carson v. St. Francis Levee District, 59 Ark. 513 . … Altheimer v. Board of Directors Plum Bayou Levee Dist., 79 Ark. 229 .

Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 7 v. Brun

105 Ark. 65 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 7, 1912

In the case' of Kraft v. … See also Spokane v. Brown, 8 Wash. 317 ; Sawyer v. Chicago, 183 Ill. 57 ; City Street Improvement Company v. Taylor, 138 Cal. 364 ; Murphy v. Peoria, 119 Ill. 509 ; Cone v. Hartford, 28 Conn. 363 ; Kirkland v.

State v. Allen

425 S.W.3d 753 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 7, 2013

“The Fourth Amendment, of course, ‘applies to all seizures of the person, including seizures that involve only a brief detention short of traditional arrest.’ ” Brown v. … See Brown, 443 U.S. at 51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 .

Gray's Butane Wholesale, Inc. v. Arkansas Liquefied Petroleum Gas Board

250 Ark. 69 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 1, 1971

Summers Appliance v. George’s Gas Co., 244 Ark. 113 , 424 S. W. 2d 171 (1968). Appellant then argues that there is no evidence that it intends to begin business with only one serviceman, particularly in light of Mr. … We have said in Summers Appliance v. George’s Gas Co., supra: The discharge of the enumerated responsibilities, as well as the others pertaining to issuing a Class 1 Permit, are not purely ministerial acts.

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. State Board of Education

195 Ark. 222 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1937

The effect of Mayers v. Byrne, and of the decision in Cooper v. Roberts, 18 How. (U. S.) 173, 115 L. … See School District No. 36 v. Gladish, 111 Ark. 329 , 163 S. W. 1194 ; Special School District No. 5 v. State, 139 Ark. 263 , 213 S. W. 961 ; State of Alabama v. Schmidt, 232 U. S. 168 , 34 S. Ct. 301 , 58 L.

Hollis Devin Martz v. John Felts, Chairman, Arkansas Board of Parole

2019 Ark. 297 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 2019

Parker v. Crow, 2010 Ark. 371, 368 S.W.3d 902. The 2 standard of review on a denial of a writ of mandamus is whether the circuit court abused its discretion. Linell v. … Benson v. Kelley, 2019 Ark. 333, 561 S.W.3d 327.

Elrod v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 45

171 Ark. 848 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1926

State v. K. C. & Memphis Ry. & Bridge Co., 117 Ark. 606 , 174 S. W. 248 ; Special School District of Texarkana v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 13 of Texarkana, 127 Ark. 341 , 181 S. W. 918 . … Sembler v. Water & Light Imp. Dist., 109 Ark. 90 , 158 S. W. 972 ; Bell v. Phillips, 116 Ark. 167 , 173 S. W. 864 ; Skipper v. Street Imp. Dist. No. 1, 144 Ark. 41 , 221 S. W. 866 .