Case law

In Re Arkansas State Board of Law Examiners

2023 Ark. 5 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 2023

Hatfield will be an at-large representative; she replaces Judge Waymond Brown, whose term has concluded. The court extends its sincere appreciation to Ms. … Hatfield for accepting appointment to this important board. The court also expresses its gratitude to Judge Brown for his dedicated service to the board.

Sloan v. Arkansas Rural Medical Practice Loan & Scholarship Board

369 Ark. 442 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 2007

In Arkco Corp. v. … Arkco Corp. v. Askew, 360 Ark. 222, 227-28 , 200 S.W.3d 444, 448 (2004) (citing Arnold v.

Arkansas Burial Ass'n Board v. McEuen Burial Ass'n

302 Ark. 133 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 23, 1990

McEuen Burial Ass’n v. Arkansas Burial Ass’n Board, 298 Ark. 572 , 769 S.W.2d 415 (1989). … Department of Human Services v.

Butler v. Board of Directors of Fourche Drainage District

99 Ark. 100 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 1911

Alexander v. Board of Directors of Crawford County Levee District, 97 Ark. 322 . … State v. Ashley, 1 Ark. 511 .

Paving Improvement District No. 51 v. Refunding Board

191 Ark. 838 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 2, 1935

Refunding Board v. Bailey, 190 Ark. 558 , 80 S. W. (2d) 61 . … See Street Improvement District v. Arkansas Highway Commission, 190 Ark. 1045 , 83 S. W. (2d) 81 .

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Board of Directors

81 Ark. 562 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1907

Co. v. … This, is the method of assessment for local improvement which was approved by this court in Ahern v. Board of Improvement, supra, and Porter v. Waterman, 77 Ark. 383 .

Garland Power & Development Co. v. State Board of Railroad

94 Ark. 422 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 4, 1910

Law, 604; Haney v. State, 34 Ark. 263 ; Reynolds v. Holland, 35 Ark. 56 ; Lancaster County v. Prey, 128 Pa. St. 593; State v. Timme, 56 Wis. 425 ; Endlich on Interpretation of Statutes, § 319. … Pulaski Co., 3 Ark. 427 ; Brem v. Ark. County Court, 9 Ark. 240 ; Willeford v. State, 43 Ark. 62 ; Danley v. Whiteley, 14 Ark. 687 ; Howard v. McDiarmid, 26 Ark. 100 ; Black v. Auditor, 26 Ark. 237 ; McCreary v.

Arkansas State Licensing Board for General Contractors v. Lane

214 Ark. 312 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1948

Miller v. Yell & Pope Bridge District, 175 Ark. 314 , 299 S. W. 15 ; and Berry v. Cousart Bayou Drainage District, 181 Ark. 974 , 28 S. W. 2d 1060 . … Berry v. Sale, 184 Ark. 655 , 43 S. W. 2d 225 .

Arkansas Baptist State Convention v. Board of Trustees

209 Ark. 236 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 29, 1945

Zavelo v. Reeves, 227 U.S. 625 , 33 S.Ct. 365 , 57 L.Ed. 676 , Ann. Cas. 1914D, 664; Dusenbury v. Hoyt, 53 N.Y. 521 , 13 Am. Rep. 543 ; Christie v. Bridgman, 51 N.J. Eq. 331 , 25 A. 939 , 30 A. 429 ; Livesay v. … Spann v. Read Phosphate Co. (C.C.A.), 238 F. 338 ; In re Merriman, Fed. Cas. No. 9, 479; Shively v. Globe Mfg. Co., 205 Iowa 1233 , 219 N.W. 266 ; Schuman Bros. v.

Cheqnet Systems, Inc. v. State Board of Collection Agencies

319 Ark. 252 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 17, 1995

The State Board of Collection Agencies and the Attorney General made demand on appellant to cease charging in excess of $15.00 per dishonored check. … McCoy v. Walker, 317 Ark. 86 , 876 S.W.2d 252 (1994).

Arkansas Hospital Ass'n v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy

297 Ark. 454 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 17, 1989

Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 316, 317 (1976). … Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221, 235 (1981).

Burns v. Thompson

64 Ark. 489 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 11, 1897

The school directors could act only as a board, and could not bind the district by their action as individuals. School District v. Bennett, 52 Ark. 511 . … Corp. § 263; School District v. Bennett, 52 Ark. 511 .

Sanders v. Bradley County Human Services Public Facilities Board

330 Ark. 675 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 4, 1997

Brown, Justice. Appellants in this case, Janette Sanders and Jerry Sanders d/b/a Sanders-2 (the Sanderses), appeal a summary-judgment order in favor of appellee Bradley County, Arkansas. … City of Damascus v. Bivens, supra; Yaffe Iron & Metal Co. v. Pulaski County, 188 Ark. 808 , 67 S.W.2d 1017 (1934).

Viswanathan v. Mississippi County Community College Board of Trustees

318 Ark. 810 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 5, 1994

Livestock & Poultry Comm’n v. … McNair v. McNair, 316 Ark. 299 , 870 S.W.2d 756 (1994).

Cooper Realty Investments Inc. v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board

355 Ark. 156 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 4, 2003

The Board also responds that “all financial obligations” has an ordinary, plain, and clear meaning that does not require interpretation. For support, the Board cites this court to Kildow v. … In Wilcox v.

Lyerley v. Manila School District No. 15

214 Ark. 245 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 1948

Sugar Grove School District No. 19 v. Booneville Special School District No. 65, 208 Ark. 722 , 187 S. W. 2d 339 . … Priest v. Moore, 183 Ark. 999 .

Board of Education of Lonoke Cty. v. Lonoke Cty.

181 Ark. 1046 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 16, 1930

L. 597, § 51; State v. Aven, 70 Ark. 291 ; Blount v. Baker, 177 Ark. 1162 . … Jacks v. Thweatt, 39 Ark. 340 ; Johnson County v. Patterson, supra.

Landmark Novelties, Inc. v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy

358 S.W.3d 890 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 2010

Hackney, Co. v. Davis, 353 Ark. 797 , 120 S.W.3d 79 (2003). However, as evidenced by this court’s decision in Arkansas Tobacco Control Bd. v. … See United States v. Curdo, 712 F.2d 1532, 1543 (2d Cir. 1983) (Friendly, J.); cf. Colautti v.

Quality Fixtures, Inc. v. Multi-Purpose Facilities Board

337 Ark. 115 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 25, 1999

Brown, Justice. … See Ottinger v. Blackwell, 173 F. Supp. 817 (E.D. Ark. 1959). In Ottinger, the district court held that the Arkansas statute making it a misdemeanor to contract to construct without a license (Ark. Stats.

Street Improvement District No. 74 v. Refunding Board

192 Ark. 892 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 22, 1936

To a complaint alleging the above facts, and an amendment thereto alleging that the board had refunded other certificates of indebtedness, and, although it is the express duty of the board so to do, it has arbitrarily refused … We so held in the recent case of Refunding Board of Arkansas v. National Refining Co., 191 Ark. 1080 , 89 S. W. (2d) 917 .