Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

1.80s

  • Franklin County Board of Education v. Riley

    183 Ark. 148 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 1931

    There were two petitions presented to the board of education of Franklin County and filed before said board on the same date. … Manley v. Moon, 177 Ark. 263 , 6 S. W. (2d) 281 . W. E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arkansas State Board of Optometry v. Dodge

    210 Ark. 404 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 30, 1946

    The decree of the Chancery Court was affirmed by this court in the case of Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry, 206 Ark. 671 , 177 S. W. 2d 410 . … The Board relies on the case of Beeson v. Chambers, 192 Ark. 265 , 90 S. W. 2d 770 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Committee "A" Arkansas State Plant Board

    255 Ark. 517 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1973

    Gregory v. Gordon, 243 Ark. 635 , 420 S.W. 2d 825 . It is also mentioned that only three members of Committee “A” were present at the hearing, rather than the full committee of four. … See Fisher v. Branscum, 243 Ark. 516 , 420 S.W. 2d 882 . It is next argued that the court erred in failing to grant appellant’s motion for a jury trial. Again, we do not agree. Ark. Stat.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Arkansas Board of Correction & Community Punishment

    324 Ark. 6 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 25, 1996

    Appellant, an inmate in the penitentiary, filed this suit against the Board of Correction and Community Punishment, the Governor, and the Attorney General. … Arkansas Intercollegiate Conf. v. Parnham, 309 Ark. 170, 174 , 828 S.W.2d 828, 831 (1992). As a general rule, this court does not address moot issues. A.P. Leonards v. E.A. Martin Mach.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. Arkansas Rural Medical Practice Loan & Scholarship Board

    385 S.W.3d 762 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 17, 2011

    No. 6 v. Neal, 2011 Ark. 233 , 381 S.W.3d 811 . First, Nelson challenges the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment to the Board on its claim for breach of contract. … Brown v. Kelton, 2011 Ark. 93 , 380 S.W.3d 361 ; Jewell v. Fletcher, 2010 Ark. 195 , 377 S.W.3d 176 . Therefore, we do not decide this issue. Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part. .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • White v. Board of Education of Independence County

    184 Ark. 480 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1931

    of Sharp County, acting under the present law and instruction of the State Board of Education and the State Superintendent of Education, relinquished jurisdiction over said district and ceded it to the board of education … Certiorari is not a writ of right but one of discretion, and will not be granted except to do substantial justice Rural Special School Districts Nos. 17 and 95 v. Ola Special School District, 182 Ark. 197 , 31 S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Arkansas Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors v. Reddick

    366 Ark. 89 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 13, 2006

    The Decision of the Board The Board concluded that in violation of the Rules of the Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors, Reddick: 1. … Similarly this court in Teasley v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board Trustees Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Buerkle

    193 Ark. 157 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 9, 1936

    Appellee’s petition for an allowance of a pension was denied by the board of trustees and he appealed to the circuit court of Arkansas county. … In City of Paragould v. Thompson, 190 Ark. 847 , 82 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Avant

    369 Ark. 211 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 2007

    Appellant Cynthia Brown Thomas appeals the order of the Clark County Circuit Court finding that it had continuing exclusive jurisdiction and that venue was proper in that court in a child-custody matter between Thomas and … Gilbert v. Moore, 362 Ark. 657, 658 , 210 S.W.3d 125, 126 (2005) (per curiam) (quoting West v. West, 362 Ark. 456, 457 , 208 S.W.3d 776, 768 (2005) (per curiam)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Arkansas Tech University v. Link

    341 Ark. 495 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 1, 2000

    Brown v. Arkansas State HVACR Lic. Bd., 336 Ark. 34 , 984 S.W.2d 402 (1999). A suit against the board of trustees of a state university is a suit against the State, and is barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. … Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997).

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology

    305 Ark. 451 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 1991

    See Herman & McLean v. Huddleston, 459 U.S. 375 (1983); Steadman v. SEC, 450 U.S. 91 (1980); Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 385 U.S. 285 (1966). … Brown, J., not participating. 1 The trial court reversed the Board’s finding that appellant also violated the rule against having a business relationship with a client, but the Board does not challenge that ruling in this

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Arkansas State Board of Collection Agencies

    373 Ark. 222 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 17, 2008

    State Plant Bd., 311 Ark. 125 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992) (declining to reach “several arguments” that were not raised before the Board); Alcoholic Bev. Control Div. v. … See Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 402 (1971); see also Smith v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Diamond G. Ranch, Inc.

    250 Ark. 104 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 1971

    by Brown’s attorneys, the firm of Garner & Parker. … Oliver v. Paul N. Howard Co., 249 Ark. 427 , 460 S. W. 2d 91 . Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MUZINGO v. Board of Law Examiners

    363 Ark. 207 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 8, 2005

    See Johnson v. State, 335 Ark. 333 , 982 S.W.2d 669 (1998) (per curiam). … Muzingo being permitted access to the Board’s brief. See id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown-Moore Lumber Co. v. Morgan

    164 Ark. 6 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1924

    The new agreement also recites that the Brown-Moore Lumber Company should give a chattel mortgage to secure this indebtedness, and this was done. … None of the elements of a partnership, as defined in Stone v. Riggs, 163 Ark. 211 , are expressed in the contract.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wisconsin & Arkansas Lumber Co. v. Brown

    143 Ark. 88 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 22, 1920

    Brown for physical injuries received by him while in the employment of the company. … Co. v. Livesay, 118 Ark. 304 . They rely on the cases, of Ultima Thule, Arkadelphia & Miss. R. R. Co. v. Benton, 86 Ark. 289 , and St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Wiseman, 119 Ark. 477 , as illustrative cases.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Butler v. Board of Directors of Fourche Drainage District

    99 Ark. 100 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 1911

    Alexander v. Board of Directors of Crawford County Levee District, 97 Ark. 322 . … State v. Ashley, 1 Ark. 511 .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • In re Ark. State Bd. of Law Examr's

    2016 Ark. 474 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 22, 2016

    Brown of Pine Bluff is appointed to the State Board of Law Examiners for a six-year term concluding on January 1, 2023. Judge Brown will be an At Large member and replaces P. … The Court extends its sincere appreciation to Judge Brown for accepting appointment to this important Board. The Court also expresses its gratitude for Ms.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hulva v. Arkansas State Board of Dental Examiners

    277 Ark. 397 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 22, 1982

    Gosnell v. State, 52 Ark. 228 , 12 S.W. 392 (1889). Accord: Missionary Supporters v. Ark. State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 231 Ark. 38 , 328 S.W.2d 139 (1959). Considerations such as those attested to by Dr. … Dixon v. State, 260 Ark. 857 , 545 S.W.2d 606 (1977). Affirmed. Purtle, J., dissents.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Arkansas State Board of Law Examiners

    2023 Ark. 5 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 2023

    Hatfield will be an at-large representative; she replaces Judge Waymond Brown, whose term has concluded. The court extends its sincere appreciation to Ms. … Hatfield for accepting appointment to this important board. The court also expresses its gratitude to Judge Brown for his dedicated service to the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.