Case law

McGhee v. Arkansas State Board of Collection Agencies

368 Ark. 60 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 16, 2006

Farrell v. Oliver, 146 Ark. 599, 602 , 226 S.W. 529, 530 (1921). See also Ark. Ass’n of County Judges v. Green, 232 Ark. 438 , 338 S.W.2d 672 (1960); Ward v. Farrell, 221 Ark. 363 , 253 S.W.2d 353 (1952); Samples v. … In Lincoln v.

Crow v. State

23 Ark. 684 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1861

Brown, sr., without this that the said action was an action in the name of the State for the use of ¥m; Brown, sr., and Baily Bean, etc. … Assuming it to have been proven that at the time the boat was sold, she was lying up as v/nHverworihy, or not in a condition to run as a steamboat, still as property, for some purposes; she was no doubt of some value to her

Feldman v. State Board of Law Examiners

256 Ark. 384 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 8, 1974

Following our opinion in Feldman v. Arkansas State Board of Law Examiners, 250 Ark. 286 , 464 S.W. 2d 789 (1971), petitioner was again permitted to take the bar exam. He again failed. … In overruling the board in Feldman v. Arkansas State Board of Law Examiners, supra, we. in an effort not only to be fair but to appear to be fair, gave petitioner every benefit of every doubt.

Arkansas State Board of Architects v. Clark

226 Ark. 548 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 11, 1956

In Hudkins v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry, 208 Ark. 577 , 187 S. W. 2d 538 , the court quoted with approval from Chief Justice Hill’s opinion in State v. Vaughan, 81 Ark. 117 , 98 S. … ‘Accord: Hudkins v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry, 208 Ark. 577 , 187 S. W. 2d 538 ; State ex rel. Atty. Genl. v. Karston, 208 Ark. 703 , 187 S. W. 2d 327 ; State ex rel. Hale v. Lawson, 212 Ark. 233 , 205 S.

Otte v. Arkansas State Board of Acupuncture

361 Ark. 279 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 31, 2005

See Brown v. Dep’t of Human Servs., 330 Ark. 764 , 956 S.W.2d 866 (1997) (holding that an administrative decision will not be set aside on a ground not presented to the agency). … Therefore, he argues, the Board is estopped from treating his license as invalid. This argument was not raised in the agency hearing and is therefore barred. See Brown v. Dep’t of Human Servs., supra.

Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy v. Hall

243 Ark. 741 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 18, 1967

The State Board of Pharmacy defied the application on the ground that it did not meet the requirements of the Board’s Regulation 36, adopted in 1966. … Walden v. Hart, 243 Ark. 650 , 420 S. W. 2d 868 (1967).

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Brown

93 Ark. 35 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1909

the terms of an order of injunction issued by the United States Circuit Court, and a three cent rate for intrastate travel was put into effect on the 18th day of October, 1908; and plaintiff knew of this fact before he boarded … Co. v. Copeland, 42 S. W. (Tex. Civ. App.) 239; Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Wynn, 97 S. W. (Tex.) 506; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Daniels, 29 S. W. (Tex. Civ. App.) 426; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v.

Lile v. Pulaski County Board of Equalization

252 Ark. 508 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 8, 1972

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is an appeal from a circuit court judgment which affirmed the levy of real property taxes for 1970 on a lot in downtown Little Rock. … That figure was approved by the board of equalization and then by the circuit court.

Board of Directors v. Cottonwood Lumber Co.

86 Ark. 221 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 11, 1908

Gouverneur v. Elmendorf, 5 Johns. Ch. 79 (Kent.); Stoddard v. Prescott, 58 Mich. 542 ; Inhabitants of Barkhamsted v. Case. 5 Conn. 528 ; Clark v. Sigourney, 17 Conn. 511 ; Gates v. Winslow, 1 Mass. 65 ; Peters v. … The secretary was without authority to bind the board by any promise he might have made. The board made no promise, and the record fails to show a -cause of action. Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Hill v. Lee County Board of Education

243 Ark. 326 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1967

Section 80-236; McLeod v. Richardson, 204 Ark. 5 , 163 S. W. 2d 166 (1942); Gibson v. Davis, 199 Ark. 456 , 134 S. W. 2d 15 (1939). The remedy by appeal is adequate and exclusive. Vaught v. Frey, 219 Ark. 525 , 243 S. … No. 4 v. Drew County Bd. of Education, 217 Ark. 725 , 233 S. W. 2d 66 (1950). We are firmly of the opinion that Act 21 did not repeal Section 80-408.

Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Pegasus Renovation Co.

347 Ark. 320 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 2001

McQuay v. Arkansas State Bd. of Architects, 337 Ark. 339 , 989 S.W.2d 499 (1999); Social Work Licensing Bd. v. Moncebaiz, 332 Ark. 67 , 962 S.W.2d 797 (1998); Files v. Arkansas State Highway and Transp. … Partlow v. Arkansas State Police Comm’n, 271 Ark. 351 , 609 S.W.2d 23 (1980). On appeal, the Board argues that the circuit court erred in reversing the Board’s decision to revoke Pegasus’s contractors license.

Anthony Williamson v. Theodore Brown, Director, Arkansas State Crime Laboratory

2026 Ark. 36 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 2026

[NO. 60CV-24-2239] THEODORE BROWN, DIRECTOR, HONORABLE CARA CONNORS, ARKANSAS STATE CRIME JUDGE LABORATORY APPELLEE AFFIRMED. RHONDA K. … Gates v. Hudson, 2025 Ark. 48, at 5, 711 S.W.3d 142, 147.

Shochet v. Arkansas Board of Law Examiners

335 Ark. 176 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1998

B. v. … Partin v. Bar, 320 Ark. at 45 , 894 S.W.2d at 910 .

Charles Hamner v. Arkansas Post-Prison Transfer Board

2025 Ark. 191 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 4, 2025

In Whiteside v. Arkansas Parole Board, 2016 Ark. 217, at 2, we held that the APA does not provide inmates an avenue for relief absent a claim sufficient to create a liberty interest. … Millsap v. Kelley, 2016 Ark. 406, at 2.

Arkansas State Board of Education v. Purifoy

292 Ark. 526 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 22, 1987

The action filed by the Bright Star Independent School District in the Chancery Court of Miller County is an appeal from a decision by an administrative agency, the Arkansas State Board of Education. … The Quality Education Act of 198 3 provides appeals from rulings by the State Board of Education may be made to a “court of competent jurisdiction.” Ark. Stat. Ann. § 80-4606. We deem that court to be the circuit court.

Frank Barton, Anita Bell, and James Pulliaum, in Their Official Capacities as the Crittenden County Board of Election Commissioners v. Shirley P. Brown and Lavonda L. Taylor

2024 Ark. 152 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 17, 2024

Voter Integrity Initiative, Inc. v. Thurston, 2014 Ark. 43, 686 S.W.3d 477; 3 Rivers Logistics, Inc. v. Brown-Wright Post No. 158 of Am. Legion, 2018 Ark. 91, 548 S.W.3d 137. … The Board is required under A.C.A. § 7-5- 2 Arkansas Dep’t of Fin. & Admin. v.

Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Butler Construction Co.

295 Ark. 223 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1988

Williams v. Scott, 278 Ark. 453 , 647 S.W.2d 115 (1983); Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Sims, 281 Ark. 81 , 661 S.W.2d 378 (1983). … Arkansas Cemetery Board v. Memorial Properties, Inc., 272 Ark. 172 , 616 S.W.2d 713 (1981). Hennesey v. S.E.C., 285 F.2d 511 (3d Cir. 1960); Unemployment Commission v. Aragon, 329 U.S. 143 (1946).

Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board v. Oudin

348 Ark. 48 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 21, 2002

The Board also relies on language from Bob Cole Bail Bonds, Inc. v. … Bd. v.

Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy v. Troilett

249 Ark. 1098 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1971

Lyle Brown, Justice. … Arkansas State Board of Architects v. Clark, 226 Ark. 548 , 291 S. W. 2d 262 (1956). In the case at bar the complainant did not meet that test. Affirmed. Harris, C. J., dissents.

State Refunding Board v. Sebastian Bridge District

199 Ark. 944 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 1940

In the case of Sebastian Bridge District v. State Refunding Board, 197 Ark. 790 , 124 S. … W. 2d 960 , we held that the board was required to pay the indebtedness of the district, consisting of bonds and interest coupons maturing October 1, 1938, in the sum of $44,075, and that since the board had remitted to the