Case law

Poyner v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board

334 Ark. 328 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 17, 1998

Boone County Board of Education v. Taylor

185 Ark. 869 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 1932

Taylor v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Company, 183 Ark. 937 , 39 S. W. (2d) 724 . … State v. Sewell, 45 Ark. 387 ; Benton v. Willis, 76 Ark. 443 , 88 S. W. 1000 ; McIntosh v. Little Rock, 159 Ark. 607 , 252 S. W. 605 ; and Connelly v. Lawhon, 180 Ark. 964 , 23 S. W. (2d) 990 .

Scales v. State Board of Law Examiners

282 Ark. 578 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1984

The State Board of Law Examiners denied appellant’s petition for reinstatement to practice law. … The Board heard the evidence and considered the matters presented by appellant.

Floyd v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy

248 Ark. 459 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 6, 1970

. § 5-710 (Supp. 1969), and remanded the matter to the Board to reduce to writing its findings of fact and of law, specifically stated. … Co. v. Manning, 241 Ark. 422 , 407 S. W. 2d 937 (1966), the circuit court’s order of remand for further proceedings is not an appealable order— i. e., it is not a final disposition of the case for purposes of appeal.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Brown

97 Ark. 505 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 30, 1911

Ry. v. Dean, 43 Ark. 529 ; Hot Springs Rd. Co. v. Deloney, 65 Ark. 177 ; Little Rock Ry. & Elec. Co. v. Goerner, 80 Ark. 158 ; St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. v. Furlow, 81 Ark. 496 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v.

One 1979 Brown Ford Pickup Truck v. State

293 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 21, 1987

See Novak v. State, 287 Ark. 271 , 698 S.W.2d 499 (1985). The appellant first raised this issue in a motion for reconsideration after the court’s decision. That is too late. Murray v. … Glasgow argues that under United States v. One 1978 Mercedes Benz Four Door Sedan, 711 F.2d 1297 (5th Cir. 1983), the phone was not a part of the truck and should not have been part of the forfeiture order.

Sebastian Bridge District v. State Refunding Board

197 Ark. 790 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 13, 1939

Sebastian Bridge District soug'ht by mandamus to compel tbe Treasurer of State, tbe Auditor of State, and tbe Bond Refunding-Board, to pay its 1938 bond and interest maturities and to refund $1,075 in interest paid by tbe … Nine bridge districts, under the construction given by the State Comptroller and apparently concurred in by the Bond Refunding Board and Treasurer of State, were affected by the. legislation.

Culpepper v. Arkansas Board of Chiropractic Examiners

343 Ark. 467 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 1, 2001

Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board, 311 Ark. 125, 130 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992). … In Cambiano v.

Prescott & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Brown

74 Ark. 606 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1905

It is held in Railway Company v. … Derrick v. Cole, 60 Ark. 394 ; Springfield & Memphis Ry. Co. v. Rhea, 44 Ark. 258 . 3.

Cain v. Arkansas State Podiatry Examining Board

275 Ark. 100 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 8, 1982

Wilson v. Lester Hurst Nursery, Inc., 269 Ark. 19 , 598 S.W. 2d 407 (1980); Sweeney v. Sweeney, 267 Ark. 595 , 593 S.W. 2d 21 (1980); Jones v. Reed, 267 Ark. 237 , 590 S.W. 2d 6 (1979). … Considering that issue, we recognize that it is the duty of an administrative board, such as the Podiatry Board, to hear the evidence, decide the credibility of witnesses and make findings of fact. Terrell Gordon v.

State ex rel. Brown v. Crow

6 Ark. 642 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1851

Varner v. County Board of Education

219 Ark. 953 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1952

Cox is a member of the School Board of District No. 2 and is, also, Chairman of the County Board of Education, and presided at the meeting of the Board when consolidation was effected? … Cox is Chairman of the County Board of Education and is, also, a member of the School Board of District No. 2; furthermore, he signed the petition to consolidate.

Board of Trustees v. Crawford County Circuit Court

431 S.W.3d 851 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 13, 2014

Brown v. Brown, 2012 Ark. 89, 387 S.W.3d 159. Generally, the appellate courts of this state do not review issues that are moot, because to do so would be to render advisory opinions, which this court will not do. … Because we have today concluded in the companion interlocutory appeal that the Board is indeed entitled to sovereign immunity, the case against the Board has been dismissed. Bd. of Trustees v.

Arkansas State Medical Board v. Cross

256 Ark. 388 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 15, 1974

The board responded to this pleading, appearing specially, with a Motion to Quash, asserting that the court had no jurisdiction to enjoin such board “from conducting a hearing under the Arkansas Medical Practices Act, Ark … See Harber v. Rhodes. 248 Ark. 1188 , 455 S.W. 2d 926 .

Board of Directors v. Crawford County Bank

108 Ark. 419 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 2, 1913

Co. v. Grayson, 72 Ark. 119 ; Porter v. Waterman, 77 Ark. 383 ; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Board of Directors Red River Levee District, 81 Ark. 562 . … Co. v. Board of Directors, 103 Ark. 127 , where the former decisions on the same subject are cited. In Moore v.

Craighead County Board of Education v. Henry

295 Ark. 242 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1988

The board cites Cade v. … While we recognize the rule that we presume statutes not to be unconstitutional, HCA Medical Services of Midwest, Inc. v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Speer

124 Ark. 337 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 5, 1916

The contention is that the board had no authority to allow Speer & Dow the sum of $1,250, or any sum, for their services, and that the board was also without power to make the additional contract and reduce the amount to … Sequoyah County v. Helms (Okla.) 139 Pac. 958 ; Ironside v. State, ex rel. (Okla.), 148 Pac. 97 .

Portis v. Board of Public Utilities, Lepanto

213 Ark. 201 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1948

W. 57 , this court said: “In Ottawa v. Carey, 108 U. S. 110 , 2 S. Ct. 366 , 27 L. … Co. v. Detroit Ry., 171 U. S. 48 , 18 S. Ct. 732, at p. 734 , 43 L.

State Board of Education v. Aycock

198 Ark. 640 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 26, 1939

In State, ex rel. v. State Board of Education, 195 Ark. 222 , 112 S. … State Board of Education, 195 Ark. 955 , 116 S. W. 2d 354 . We cannot agree that Amendment 20 is violated or that Walls v. State Board of Education is controlling.

Watts v. Searcy County Board of Elections

364 Ark. 452 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 2005

Allison v. Lee County Election Commission et al., 359 Ark. 388 , 198 S.W.3d 133 (2004). To do so would be to render advisory opinions, which we will not do. Id. … Benton v. Bradley, 344 Ark. 24 , 37 S.W.3d 640 (2001). Thus, for the foregoing reasons, we dismiss appellants’ appeal as moot.