Case law

American Bauxite Co. v. Board of Equalization

119 Ark. 362 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 21, 1915

Laser v. Jones, 116 Ark. 206 , 172 S. … Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky, 199 U.

Mourot v. Arkansas Board of Dispensing Opticians

285 Ark. 128 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 4, 1985

Contrary to the Board’s argument, neither this court nor the Board has the authority to add a “full time,” “primary mode of employment,” or “retail” requirement to subsection (b). … Bishop v. Linkway Stores, Inc., 280 Ark. 106 , 655 S.W.2d 426 (1983); City of Little Rock v. Arkansas Corp. Commission, 209 Ark. 18 , 189 S.W.2d 382 (1945).

Citizens Bank v. Arkansas State Banking Board

271 Ark. 703 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 19, 1981

We also held in Arkansas Savings & Loan Association Board v. … We held in Arkansas Savings & Loan Association Board and Security Savings & Loan Association v.

Moore v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

503 S.W.3d 796 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 1, 2016

Arkansas Beverage Retailers Ass’n, Inc. v. … Friar v. Erwin, 2014 Ark. 487, 450 S.W.3d 666.

Holloway v. Arkansas State Board of Architects

352 Ark. 427 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 2003

McQuay v. Arkansas State Bd. of Architects, 337 Ark. 339 , 989 S.W.2d 499 (1999); Social Work Licensing Board v. Moncebaiz, 332 Ark. 67 , 962 S.W.2d 797 (1998). … McQuay, supra; Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board, 311 Ark. 125 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992).

W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Sims

146 Ark. 253 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 29, 1920

Clay County v. Brown Lumber Co., 90 Ark. 417 ; Clay County v. Bank of Knobel, 105 Ark. 450 .

Arkansas Cemetery Board v. Memorial Properties, Inc.

272 Ark. 172 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 11, 1981

This was clearly stated in Hennesey v. … The United States Supreme Court stated the same concept in Unemployment Comm’n v.

Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry

206 Ark. 671 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1944

He did National’s work exclusively. 3 We think the case is controlled by Melton v. Garter, 204 Ark. 595 , 164 S. W. 2d 453 . In that case constitutionality of Act 94 was upheld.

Bohannon v. Arkansas State Board of Nursing

320 Ark. 169 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1995

The findings of fact made by the Board are not abstracted. We have held that a summary of the pleadings and the judgment appealed from are the bare essentials of an abstract. Logan County v. … In Haynes v.

Jarvis v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

253 Ark. 724 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 8, 1973

This decision was appealed to the Alcoholic Control Board which affirmed the Director’s decision, after which a petition for review of the Board’s decision was filed in the Jackson County Circuit Court under the authority … For reversal, it is simply asserted that the circuit court erred in not reversing the decision of the Board for the reason that the findings of the Board are not supported by substantial evidence.

Hudkins v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry

208 Ark. 577 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 23, 1945

The “ salaried physician” referred to in Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry, 206 Ark. 671 , 177 S. W. 2d 410 , severed his relations with National Optical Stores Company and was succeeded by Dr. Ira N. … American Jurisprudence, v. 12, p. 409; Beeson v. Chambers, 192 Ark. 265 , 90 S. W. 2d 770 .

Brown-Hinton Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Ware & Son

177 Ark. 1141 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 8, 1928

The instant case is somewhat similar to that of Brown Shoe Co. v. Stone, 172 Ark. 1156 , 292 S. W. 117 . … The case of Simmons Hardware Co. v. Rhodes, 7 Fed.

Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Muncrief

308 Ark. 373 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 24, 1992

Webb v. Bishop, 242 Ark. 320 , 413 S.W.2d 862 (1967). … No. 1 v.

Arkansas State Board of Architects v. Larsen

226 Ark. 536 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 11, 1956

To the complaint Larsen demurred on the ground that the Board’s remedy at law was adequate. … Another interesting case is that of Portis v. Board of Public Utilities, 212 Ark. 822 , 208 S. W. 2d 772 .

Undem v. State Board of Law Examiners

266 Ark. 683 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 1979

Arkansas Bar Ass’n. v. Block, supra. See also, Beach Abstract & Guaranty Co. v. Bar Ass’n of Arkansas, 230 Ark. 494 , 326 S.W. 2d 900 ; Creekmore v. Izard, 236 Ark. 558 , 367 S.W. 2d 419 . … These holdings were modified in Creekmore v.

Poyner v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board

334 Ark. 328 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 17, 1998

Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy v. Patrick

243 Ark. 967 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1968

In Sorrells v. United States, 287 U. … Entrapment occurs only when the criminal conduct was the ‘product of the creative activity’ of law enforcement officials. ’ ’ In Dugan Drug Stores, Inc. v.

Floyd v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy

251 Ark. 626 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1971

See Floyd v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy, 248 Ark. 459 , 451 S. W. 2d 874 . … Examples of State cases are Hooper v. Goldstein, (Rhode Island) 241 A. 2d 809 ; State Board of Medical Examiners v. Gandy, (South Carolina) 149 S. E. 2d 644 ; State v.

Culpepper v. Arkansas Board of Chiropractic Examiners

343 Ark. 467 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 1, 2001

Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board, 311 Ark. 125, 130 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992). … In Cambiano v.

Boone County Board of Education v. Taylor

185 Ark. 869 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 1932

Taylor v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Company, 183 Ark. 937 , 39 S. W. (2d) 724 . … State v. Sewell, 45 Ark. 387 ; Benton v. Willis, 76 Ark. 443 , 88 S. W. 1000 ; McIntosh v. Little Rock, 159 Ark. 607 , 252 S. W. 605 ; and Connelly v. Lawhon, 180 Ark. 964 , 23 S. W. (2d) 990 .