Case law

State v. Brown

21 Kan. 38 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1878

(State v. McCormick, 27 Iowa, 402 ; State v. Watkins, 27 Iowa, 415 ; Bower v. The State, 5 Mo. 364 ; State v. Jones, 20 Mo. 58 ; State v. Reaky, 1 Mo. Appeal, 3; Fouts v. The State, 8 Ohio St. 98 ; Kain v. … Brown and Thomas Craig then and there in their right hands held.”

Brown v. Norvell

88 Ark. 590 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 11, 1909

The principles announced by this court in Hargus v. Hayes, 83 Ark. 186 , and Davie v. Davie, 52 Ark. 224 , are decisive of the present question, though those were cases in equity and not ejectment cases.

Brown v. State

325 Ark. 504 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 16, 1996

See Tackett v. State, supra. … Brown’s reliance upon the case of Hill v. State, 303 Ark. 462 , 798 S.W.2d 65 (1990) is also misplaced.

Brown v. State

239 Ark. 909 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 8, 1965

In Jones v. State, 166 Ark. 290 , 265 S. … Wright v. State, 35 Ark. 639 ; Glenn v. State, 71 Ark. 86 , 71 S. W. 254 ; Keese & Pilgreen v. State, 223 Ark. 261 , 265 S. W. 2d 542 ; Johnson v. State, 97 Ark. 131 , 133 S. W. 596 ; Morgan v.

Brown v. Nisler

179 Ark. 178 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 11, 1929

True, this, court held in Taaffe v. Sanderson, 173 Ark. 970 , 294 S. … In Storey v.

Polk v. Brown

117 Ark. 321 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 1915

In the case of Donahue v. … See, also, Petty v. Grisard, 45 Ark. 117 . In the case of Bell v.

Brown v. State

368 Ark. 344 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 4, 2007

See Brown v. State, 95 Ark. App. 348 , 237 S.W.3d 95 (2006). When we grant a petition for review, this court reviews the case as if the appeal had originally been filed in this court. Stewart v. … Camargo v. State, 346 Ark. 118 , 55 S.W.3d 255 (2001).

Brown v. State

143 Ark. 523 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 1920

Then, too, Baker had a conversation with Brown shortly after the robbery with regard to it, and the jury might have inferred from what Brown said that he had carried the parties to the scene of the robbery. … Dunmore v. State (Ala.), 22 So. 541 . The remarks of the prosecuting attorney were similar to the remarks of counsel held prejudicial in Fort v. State, 74 Ark. 210 , and German-American Ins. Co. v. Harper, 70 Ark. 305 .

Brown v. State

315 Ark. 466 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1994

Pilcher v. State, 303 Ark. 335 , 796 S.W.2d 845 (1990). … See Bennett v. State, 302 Ark. 179 , 789 S.W.2d 436 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 851 (1990). In sum, appellant Brown’s assignments of error are without merit.

Brown v. Arkansas State Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration (HVACR) Licensing Board

336 Ark. 34 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 7, 1999

Appellant, Herbert Brown, appeals from a decision by the Circuit Court of Sebastian County, affirming the decision and ruling of the Arkansas State Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration (HVACR) Licensing … Honor v. Yamuchi, 307 Ark. 324, 331 , 820 S.W.2d 267, 271 (1991). See also Murphy v.

Dean v. Brown

216 Ark. 761 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1950

That they desire to adopt Nettie Brown Bond, a female minor child of C._ W. … The case of Morris v.

Brown v. Hardy

95 Ark. 123 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 16, 1910

Wallace v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 83 Ark. 359 ; Files v. Law, 88 Ark. 449 ; Haglin v. Atkinson-Williams Hardware Co., 93 Ark. 85 .

Brown v. State

373 Ark. 453 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 2008

Appellant, Richard Brown, by and through his attorney, David O. Bowden, moves this court to file a belated brief. After a final extension, Brown’s brief was due on April 23, 2008. … Wertz v. State, 373 Ark. 260 , 284 S.W.3d 481 (2008) (citing Stewart v. State, 319 Ark. 242 , 889 S.W.2d 771 (1995)). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. Id. (citing Strom v.

Brown v. State

231 Ark. 363 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 1959

In Hamm v. State, 214 Ark. 171 , 214 S. … In Tignor v. State, 76 Ark. 489 , 89 S.

Cates v. Brown

278 Ark. 242 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1983

Appellee Roy Brown was the operator of a logging truck belonging to appellee Gaylor Thomas. … Boyd v. Brown, 257 Ark. 445 , 373 S.W.2d 711 (1963). However, the second phase of this point was preserved.

Brown v. State

262 Ark. 298 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 17, 1977

Ball v. State, 48 Ark. 94 , 2 S.W. 462 (1886); Hudley v. State, 36 Ark. 237 (1880). … Brown testified that he was in Memphis at the time of the robbery. His sister was called to testify that Brown telephoned her that evening and said that he was in Memphis.

Brown v. State

259 Ark. 464 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 1976

In Finley v. … In Keith v.

Brown v. State

264 Ark. 944 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1979

Prior to the rape trial of Johnny Charles Brown, the State filed a motion in limine, seeking to prohibit any mention of prior sexual conduct between the prosecuting witness and Brown. … From the trial court’s interlocutory ruling that the prior sexual contact between appellant and the prosecutrix was not relevant to Brown’s defense of consent, Brown brings this appeal pursuant to Ark. Stat.

Brown v. State

248 Ark. 561 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 20, 1970

Lyle Brown, Justice. Herbert Lee Brown appeals from a conviction on a charge of illegal possession of narcotics. … The question was raised in Rodriguez v.

Sanders v. Brown

65 Ark. 498 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 8, 1898

Brown that we will forever warrant and defend the title to said lands against all lawful claims whatsoever, except the taxes of the year 1893, which the grantee is to pay.” … Such is the position assumed in Blackie v. Hudson, 117 Mass. 181 . A seemingly contrary doctrine is put forth in Dowdny v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 55 N.