Case law

Hogrobrooks v. Board of Law Examiners

357 Ark. 36 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 15, 2004

Per Curito a Appellant Heather Patrice Hogrobrooks seeks to appeal a decision by the Appellee State Board of Law Examiners not to reinstate her to the Bar of Arkansas. On February 24, 2004, Ms. … The Board did not file a response. We deny Ms. Hogrobrooks’ motion for rule on clerk and order that she file a conforming brief within ten days from the date of this per curiam opinion.

Smith v. Refunding Board of Arkansas

191 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 27, 1935

Sess.) in the case of Refunding Board v. Bailey, 190 Ark. 558 , 80 S. W. (2d) 61, 64 . … We sustained the act as a whole in Sparling v. Refunding Board, 189 Ark. 189 , 71 S.

St. L., I. M. & .S. Ry. v. Brown

49 Ark. 253 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1887

In July, 1886, Brown sued the railroad company on the following complaint: “The plaintiff, Randolph Brown, states that the defendant, the St. … Collins v. Mack, 31 Ark., 684; Hutchinson v. Hutchinson, 34 id., 164; Riley v. Norman, 39 id., 158; State v. Reed, 45 id., 333.

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brown

111 Ark. 288 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 2, 1914

Brown being pushed from its moving train. … Brown passed him in the aisle, if other passengers did not.

Hinsley v. Arkansas State Board

276 Ark. 243 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 1, 1982

The Arkansas State Board of Dental Examiners (hereinafter the Board) suspended the license of appellant, Dr. … The Pulaski County Circuit Court sustained the Board; on appeal, we reverse. The Board charged appellant with violating Ark. Stat.

Arkansas State Medical Board v. Leipzig

299 Ark. 71 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 1989

Appellee Bruce Leipzig, M.D., filed suit in Chancery Court of Pulaski County, First Division, against appellant Arkansas State Medical Board and the individual board members seeking an injunction against the board and its … Hurwitz v. North, 271 U.S. 40 (1926).

Arkansas State Medical Board v. Leonard

267 Ark. 61 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 5, 1979

Co. v. Owen, 111 Ark. 554 , 164 S.W. 720 (1914); 81 Am. Jur. 2d, Witnesses, § 231; 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2380 (McNaughton rev. 1961). … Hosto v. Brickell, 265 Ark. 147 , 577 S.W. 2d 401 (1979).

School District v. Board of Improvement

65 Ark. 343 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 28, 1898

And this court in Board of Improvement v. … In Board of Improvement v.

Stobaugh v. County Board of Education

182 Ark. 675 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 10, 1930

The county board of education of Van Burén‘County, proceeding under the authority of act No. 144 of the Acts of 1927, without any petition being circulated or filed, gave notice to the residents and patrons of Common School … was taken to the circuit court where on a trial the order of the county board of education was sustained.

Isbell-Brown Co. v. Stevens Grocer Co.

118 Ark. 17 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 29, 1915

Brownfield v. Dudley E. Jones Co., 98 Ark. 495 ; Roberts Cotton Oil Co. v. Grady, 105 Ark. 53 ; Templeton v. Equitable Mfg. Co., 79 Ark. 456 . … In the case of Gibson v.

Brown v. Peoples Bank

127 Ark. 486 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1917

Brown.” As a witness in his own behalf appellant offered to testify that John S. … And in the case of High v.

Kale v. Arkansas State Medical Board

367 Ark. 151 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 2006

In Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. … Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Oudin, supra. Regulation 19 of the Arkansas State Medical Board states in pertinent part: A.

Smith v. Refunding Board of Arkansas

192 Ark. 145 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 3, 1936

It is conceded by appellant that under the decision in the case of Refunding Board of Arkansas v. National Refining Co., 191 Ark. 1080 , 89 S. … It is insisted, however, that to act on the claims here involved would be beyond the scope of the board’s authority, and that the courts may intervene to enjoin the unauthorized action of the board.

Ellis v. State Printing Board

178 Ark. 836 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 7, 1929

In Arkansas Democrat Co. v. Press Printing Co., 57 Ark. 322 , 21 S. … We are therefore of the opinion that, under the (circumstances of this case, this court should not substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Commissioners, even though we might be of the opinion that the board had

Arkansas Savings & Loan Board v. Southerland

256 Ark. 445 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1974

In considering applications for a charter, the board carries a heavy responsibility. It is very similar to that of the State Banking Board which we had occasion to emphasize in Piggott State Bank v. … The courts are concluded by the board’s findings, if they are supported by substantial evidence. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 67-1811 (Repl. 1966); Heber Springs Savings & Loan Assn. v.

W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Oaties

189 Ark. 338 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 28, 1934

Home Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. Brown

188 Ark. 98 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 6, 1933

Scott v. Carnes, 183 Ark. 650 , 37 S. W. (2d) 876 . … It was said by this court in the case of Rubel v. Parker, 107 Ark. 314 , 155 S.

Hoffman v. Gregory

361 Ark. 73 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 2005

See Ware v. Crowell, supra; Martin v. Smith, supra; Stewart v. McDade. supra; Anderson v. Forbes, supra; and Henrich v. Newell, supra. … P. - Civ. 3(d) (2004); Boothe v. Boothe, 341 Ark. 381 , 17 S.W.3d 464 (2000); Brown v. Minor, 305 Ark. 556 , 810 S.W.2d 334 (1991).

Poyner v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board

335 Ark. 260 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1998

Arkansas State Plant Board v. Bullock

345 Ark. 373 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 28, 2001

Culpepper v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 343 Ark. 467 , 36 S.W.3d 335 (2001). … In response, the Board directs us to Walker v.