Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.10s
Curry v. Pope County Equalization Board
385 S.W.3d 130 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 6, 2011
Appellant alleged that certain practices of the assessor and the equalization board were prohibited by amendment 79 and sought an injunction prohibiting the assessor or the equalization board from continuing to implement … See Morgan v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCollie v. Arkansas State Medical Board
370 Ark. 180 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 7, 2007
Baxter v. … In Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedSocial Work Licensing Board v. Moncebaiz
332 Ark. 67 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 26, 1998
Arkansas Dept. of Human Servs. v. Thompson, 331 Ark. 181, 185 , 959 S.W.2d 46 (1998). … Board of Trustees v. Stodola, 328 Ark. 194, 199 , 942 S.W.2d 255, 257 (1997). Wherever possible, we read statutes relating to the same subject matter in harmony. Id.
Cited 18 timesPublished280 Ark. 441 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 1983
Beaumont diverted $176,155.56 from the school tax collection account of appellee, Pulaski County Board of Education, to the Pulaski County General Fund. … In Penix v. Shaddox, 165 Ark. 152 , 263 S.W. 389 (1924), this Court found that it was the duty of the county to furnish a courthouse and to provide the necessary offices for the several county officers.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGazaway v. Greene County Equalization Board
314 Ark. 569 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 1, 1993
To the same effect see Jim Paws, Inc. v. Equalization Board of Garland County, 289 Ark. 113 , 710 S.W.2d 197 (1986). Therefore, under Ark. … In Tuthill v.
Cited 60 timesPublishedArkansas State Medical Board v. Bolding
324 Ark. 238 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1996
Dep’t Human Servs. v. Greene Acres Nurs. Homes, 296 Ark. 475 , 757 S.W.2d 563 (1988); Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. Allied Tel. Co., 274 Ark. 478 , 625 S.W.2d 515 (1981). … Pledger v. Boyd, 304 Ark. 91 , 799 S.W.2d 807 (1990); Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd. v. Butler Constr. Co., 295 Ark. 223 , 748 S.W.2d 129 (1988)(emphasis added).
Cited 44 timesPublishedArkansas Cotton Growers' Co-Operative Ass'n v. Brown
168 Ark. 504 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 13, 1925
Ass'n. v. Lentz, 107 Or. 561 ; Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n. v. Schulte, 113 Kan. 672 ; Tobacco Growers' Ass'n. v. Jones, 185 N.C. 275 ; Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n. v. … Stovall, (Tex.) 253 S.W. 1101 ; Washington Cranberry Growers' Ass'n. v. Moore, 117 Wn. 430 ; Brown v. Staple Cotton Growers' Co-op. Ass'n., 132 Miss. 859 ; Northern Wis. Tobacco Pool v. Bekkedole, 197 N.W.
Cited 14 timesPublishedBrimer v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board
312 Ark. 401 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 29, 1993
Michael Hoofman is an investigator with the Board. According to Hoofman’s testimony before the Board, he first investigated the appellant, Brimer, when he was working on the Brown Sheet Metal Building in Gravel Ridge. … Control v. Person, 309 Ark. 588 , 832 S.W.2d 149 (1992).
Cited 49 timesPublishedFulkerson v. Refunding Board of Arkansas
201 Ark. 957 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 17, 1941
Co. v. … In Matthews v.
Cited 53 timesPublishedSt. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Brown
62 Ark. 254 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1896
The plaintiff, Drura Brown, and her husband, referred to in the record as Dr. … Co. v. Timmons, 51 Ark. 459 ; Boyce v. Ry. Co., 63 Ia. 70 ; Morris v. R. I. & Pacific R. Co. 65 Ib. 727; Herrick v. M. & St. L. R. Co., 31 Minn. 11 ; Tex. & Pacific R. Co. v. Cox, 145 U. S. 593 ; Wintuska v. L. & N. R.
Cited 21 timesPublishedSpringdale Board of Education v. Bowman
294 Ark. 66 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 7, 1987
In addition, the Board contends mandamus is the procedure by which courts review school board actions in the expulsion of students, and, to support this proposition, cites the cases of Williams v. … Lewis v. Conlee, 258 Ark. 715 , 529 S.W.2d 132 (1975).
Cited 35 timesPublishedJeffrey Brown v. State of Arkansas
644 S.W.3d 247 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 2022
Brown v. State, 2021 Ark. 189, at 1–3. … Smith v. State, 2020 Ark. 171, at 2–3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBockman v. Ark. State Medical Board
229 Ark. 143 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 2, 1958
A provision of this kind is manifestly appropriate when the board members are not trained in the law, for the tribunal could not proceed at all if it were required to observe technical rules of evidence. Meffert v. … Co. v. Goodrum, 189 Ark. 509 , 74 S. W. 2d 230 .
Cited 30 timesPublishedEclectic State Medical Board v. Beatty
203 Ark. 294 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 8, 1941
State Medical Board of Arkansas Medical Society v. McCrary, 95 Ark. 511 , 130 S. W. 544 , 30 L. R. A:, N. S., 783, Ann. Cas. 1912A, 631, and cases there cited. In the case of State Bar Commission v. … To the same effect is the case of Freeman v. State Board, L. R.
Cited 16 timesPublishedBrown v. St. L., I. M. & S. Ry.
52 Ark. 120 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1889
Maria Brown, the plaintiff, was not prejudiced by the court’s refusal to instruct the jury that they ... . ... might return a verdict for punitive damages, because by their finding she was entitled to nothing. 2. … The plaintiff’s third prayer for instruction was inconsistent with the ruling in Monday v. St. L., I. M. and S. Ry. Co., 49 Ark., 257. Moreover, it was not responsive to the cause of action stated in the complaint. 3.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBoard of Zoning Adjustment v. Cheek
328 Ark. 18 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1997
See West Apartments, Inc. v. Booth, 297 Ark. 247 , 760 S.W.2d 861 (1988); see also Ottens v. State, 316 Ark. 1 , 871 S.W.2d 329 (1994); Edwards v. City of Conway, 300 Ark. 135 , 777 S.W.2d 583 (1989). … Cheek argues that, because the Board’s petition was denied and the Board did not appeal the trial court’s mandamus order, the Board is barred by res judicata and cannot now collaterally attack it.
Cited 13 timesPublishedHicks v. Arkansas State Medical Board
260 Ark. 31 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 21, 1976
In Shivers, et al v. … See also McCarley v. Orr, 247 Ark. 109 , 445 S.W. 2d 65 (1969). We cannot agree with the interpretation placed on the statute by the attorney general and the Board.
Cited 13 timesPublishedCounty Board of Education v. Austin
169 Ark. 436 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 1925
See also Hartford v. West Hartford School Dist., 102 Ark. 261 ; Cost v. Shenault, 113 Ark. 19 ; Dickinson v. Edmonson, 120 Ark. 80 . … In the case of Dickinson v. Edmonson, supra, we quoted at page 89, from the Supreme Court of Washington in School District No. 20 of Spokane County v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedJoey Brown Interest, Inc. v. Merchants National Bank
284 Ark. 418 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1985
In U.S. v. … In Chambers v.
Cited 18 timesPublished217 Ark. 386 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 29, 1950
While the circuit court dismissed on another ground, tbe appeal from tbe county board’s order was subject to dismissal on tbe first ground set out in tbe motion to dismiss. In Gibson v. Davis, 199 Ark. 456 , 134 S. … No. 76 v. Smithville Dist. No. 31, 213 Ark. 268 , 211 S. W. 2d 641 . Although not abstracted, the record reflects that a bond for costs was filed by appellant with tbe circuit clerk on September 26, 1949.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna