Case law

Washington County v. Board of Trustees

480 S.W.3d 173 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 2016

In Blackwood, in addressing tax statutes regarding the county, we explained that The case of Board of Improvement v. … In State v. University of Arkansas Board of Trustees, 241 Ark. 399, 401 , 407 S.W.2d 916, 916-17 (1966), we explained: In the light of the holding of the United States Supreme Court in State of Arkansas v.

Board of Trustees v. Stodola

326 Ark. 581 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 11, 1996

Jeremy Kennedy v. Arkansas Parole Board

696 S.W.3d 812 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 26, 2024

(Board)1 decision. … –Civ. 4(b) (2023); Fuller v. State, 316 Ark. 341, 345, 872 S.W.2d 54, 56 (1994); see also Jewel v.

Brown v. Central Arkansas Production Credit Ass'n

256 Ark. 804 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 24, 1974

Ragge v. Bryan, 249 Ark. 164 , 458 S.W. 2d 403 . In an effort to meet this burden, Henry Brown testified that he was charged $2,019 interest when he made the $6,000 payment. … Textron, Ine. v. Whitener, 249 Ark. 57 , 458 S.W. 2d 367 ; Ragge v. Bryan, supra.

Woodlawn School District No. 6 v. Brown

216 Ark. 14 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1949

Upon rendering judgment the court said: “Gentlemen, the Court is going to hold this, that it has no power to control the discretion of the Board of the School’s Superintendent in determining the schedule of its routes; that … this Board has made splendid progress in the development of this school district; but in doing that it has developed transportation on certain parts of the district faster than it has on others, and the others or some of

Earl v. Board of Improvement

70 Ark. 211 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 15, 1902

Orrel is in accordance with Ahern v. Board of Improvement, 69 Ark. 68 , 61 S. W. 575 . To the above amount of $3,005 should be added the individual assessment of W. T. … The statute in reference to this is section 5366 of Sandels & HilFs Digest, which reads as follows: “ If the assessment first levied shall prove insufficient to complete the improvement, the board shall report the amount

Kozal v. Board of Correction

310 Ark. 648 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 19, 1992

City of Clinton v. Jones, 302 Ark. 109 , 787 S.W.2d 242 (1990); Taylor v. Moore, 99 Ark. 412 , 138 S.W. 634 (1911).

Dickson v. Board of Directors

151 Ark. 22 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 5, 1921

Tbe opinion on the former appeal contains a statement of the facts, and is reported in 146 Ark. p. 14, under the style of Dickson v. Board of Directors of Long Prairie Levee District. … Co. v. Kimbro, 75 Ark. 211 . Ou the former appeal, the issue raised was whether or not the land in question had been appropriated by the levee board for a right-of-way in the manner prescribed by the statute.

Brown v. Girard Fire & Marine Insurance

182 Ark. 671 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 10, 1930

Co. v. Wilkerson, 154 Ark. 455 . Affirmed.

Harrill v. Board of Commissioners

282 Ark. 348 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 7, 1984

In a dispute between an improvement district and its creditors, the district’s board of commissioners represents the district. … Neterer v. Dickinson & Watkins, 153 Ark. 5 , 239 S.W. 722 (1922). Still another similar Arkansas statute was held constitutional by the Supreme Court in Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Western Crawford Road Imp.

Brown v. Waterworks Improvement District No. 1

147 Ark. 584 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 7, 1921

Board of Improvement, 50 Ark. 116 ; Improvement Dist. No. 1 of Wynne v. Brown, 86 Ark. 61 ; Sembler v. Water & Light Improvement Dist. No. 2, 109 Ark. 90 ; Augusta v. Smith, 117 Ark. 93 ; Road Improvement Dist. v. … See Board of Improvement Dist. No. 60 v. Cotter, 71 Ark. 556 ; State v. Handlin, 100 Ark. 175 ; McDaniel v. Herrn, 120 Ark. 288 , and other cases collated in 4 Crawford’s Digest, p. 4677, § 54.

Southern Crawford Road Improvement District v. Brown

156 Ark. 267 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 18, 1922

Nall v. Kelley, 120 Ark. 277 . … Gould v. Sanford, 155 Ark. 304 .

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Brown

75 Ark. 137 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 22, 1905

of Brown calling on the cashier, after the railroad was in default. … Co. v. Leep, 58 Ark. 407 , and St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Paul, 64 Ark. 83 . The judgment is affirmed.

Brown v. Monroe County Road Improvement District

153 Ark. 606 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 22, 1922

Brown & Froley (hereinafter called appellants) are partners engaged in the business of constructing roads in the State of Arkansas. … True, the testimony of Dickinson, one of tbe engineers, who was a member of the board of arbitration, tended to show that the report of the board of arbitration was not really correct, but was made only for the purpose of

Ross v. Desha Levee Board

83 Ark. 176 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 3, 1907

In Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad Co, 166 U. … Ferguson v. Josey, 70 Ark. 94 ; Kirkland v. State, 72 Ark. 171 . In Garland Novelty Co. v.

Rose v. Arkansas State Plant Board

363 Ark. 281 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 22, 2005

Otis v. State, 355 Ark. 590 , 142 S.W.3d 615 (2004); Smith v. State, 354 Ark. 226 , 118 S.W.3d 542 (2003). … Brown, J., not participating.

Fulmer v. Board of Commissioners

286 Ark. 419 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 8, 1985

The only cases cited by the appellant on this point are Franklin v. State, 267 Ark. 311 , 590 S.W.2d 28 (1979), and Roswell v. Driver, 268 Ark. 819 , 596 S.W.2d 352 (Ark.

Arkansas Cotton Growers' Cooperative Ass'n v. Brown

179 Ark. 338 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 8, 1929

Arkansas Cotton Growers’ Cooperative Association v. Brown, 168 Ark. 504 , 270 S. W. 946 , and McCauley v. Arkansas Rice Growers’ Cooperative Association, 171 Ark. 1155 , 287 S. W. 419 . … Hopkins v. Harper, 46 Ark. 252 . As said in Martin v.

Milwee v. Board of Directors

105 Ark. 77 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 7, 1912

Lawyer v. Carpenter, 80 Ark. 411 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. State, 82 Ark. 305 ; Pulaski County v. Downer, 10 Ark. 588 ; Clarendon v. Walker, 72 Ark. 8 ; Davies v. Holland, 43 Ark. 425 ; Wilson v. … Co. v. Bowman, 76 Ark. 34 ; Campbell v. Samples, 92 Ark. 79 . In United States v. Claftin, 97 U.

Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board

311 Ark. 125 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1992

The Pest Control Act allows adjudicatory hearings to be held by the board or an authorized committee of the board. Ark. Code Ann. § 17-30-220 (a)(1987). This process had been recognized by this court in Thomas v. … In Alcoholic Beverage Control Div. v.