Case law

Brown v. McGehee

136 Ark. 597 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 1918

Appellant, Arthur Brown, had no knowledge of cars and so informed appellee. … Evatt v. Hudson, 97 Ark. 268 ; Jarratt v. Langston, 99 Ark. 438 ; Brown v. LeMay, 101 Ark. 95 ; Bank of Monette v. Hale, 104 Ark. 388 ; Stewart v. Fleming, 105 Ark. 37 .

Brown v. Sellers

230 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 1959

Sellers v. Brown, 225 Ark. 989 , 287 S. W. 2d, 471 , opinion February 20, 1956; and Sellers v. Brown, 228 Ark. 353 , 307 S. W. 2d 543 . … On the first appeal ( 225 Ark. 989 ) Sellers and wife were appellants and the appellees were the official board members of the Central Assembly of Grod Church and there was involved an accounting between the Church and its

Brown v. Wells

228 Ark. 179 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 4, 1957

The case of Beck v. … Wells.” ' To support his contention, Brown cites Wilkins v. Lenon, 182 Ark. 953 , 33 S. W. 2d 1093 ; and Botts v. Stephen, 203 Ark. 1031 , 160 S. W. 2d 198 .

Brown v. Headlee

224 Ark. 156 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 1, 1954

Digest) by this Court in Dunbar v. Street Improvement District No. 1 of Dardanelle, 172 Ark. 656 , 290 S. … See also, Fry v. Poe, 175 Ark. 375 , 1 S. W. 2d 29 , and Street Improvement District No. 1 of City of Booneville v. Cooper, 215 Ark. 760 , 223 S. W. 2d 607 . Accordingly, the decree is affirmed.

Brown v. Mifflin

220 Ark. 166 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1952

Brown’s claim as a mortgagee is subordinate to that of the appellee. Mrs. Mifflin’s mortgage, even with a void acknowledgment, is valid against a voluntary conveyance. Leonhard v. Flood, 68 Ark. 162 , 56 S. W. 781 . … Haldiman v. Taft, 102 Ark. 45 , 143 S. W. 112 ; Miller v. Mattison, 105 Ark. 201 , 150 S. W. 710 . Affirmed.

Board of Directors v. Williford

120 Ark. 415 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 1915

in each case where the board declared that an emergency had arisen. … That, necessarily, is left to the discretion of the board. So long as the board does not act arbitrarily, capriciously or fraudulently, their conduct in declaring extraordinary emergencies cannot be Challenged.

Bell v. Board of Directors

109 Ark. 433 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 13, 1913

Collier v. Board of Directors of Jefferson County Bridge District, 106 Ark. 151 , 153 S. W. 259 . … See Money v. Burke, 92 Ark. 84 .

Crockett & Brown, PA v. Wilson

321 Ark. 150 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1995

See Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Courson, 312 Ark. 363 , 849 S.W.2d 938 (1993) (C & B I); Crockett & Brown P.A. v. Wilson, 314 Ark. 578 , 864 S.W.2d 244 (1993) (C & B II). … In fact, this court held in Crockett & Brown, P.A. v.

E. O. Barnett Bros. v. Brown

140 Ark. 636 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 24, 1919

Appellee, Mose Brown, sued the appellants, E. O. … That at the time of the sale the plaintiff, Mose Brown, did not know of any litigation about the mare. “Third.

Allen-West Commission Co. v. Brown

69 Ark. 163 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 23, 1901

Brown, as trustee, to secure a note of $1 j030 given by them’to Mrs. Lou M. … It is not contended that the rule in Main v.

Board of Conference v. Phillips

187 Ark. 1113 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1933

This action of the board is. made through the county superintendent who is the agent of the board for that purpose and clothed with the duty of keeping the record of the county board of education and of filing with the county … If, in fact, there had been no such certificate made or filed by the county board of education, that might have been proved in the same manner as was done in the case of Thomas v. Spires, supra.

Weiser-Brown Oil Co. v. Sneed

265 Ark. 95 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1979

In Abbott v. … In Snyder v.

National Benefit Life Insurance v. Brown

180 Ark. 1129 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 11, 1929

This action at law was instituted by appellee, Sarah V. T. … Allen v. Francis, 171 Ark. 1187 , 287 S. W. 182 .

Brown v. Marshall Ice Electric Company

209 Ark. 925 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1946

Brown told me about his daughter going up into the attic and hearing noises. By my experience of 15 or 20 years I did not suppose there would.be any trouble. … and it was not reconnected until -after Wright arrived at Brown’s home.

Porter v. State ex rel. Brown

4 Ark. 226 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1848

This was an action instituted in. the Phillips ■circuit court by the State, at the instance, and for the use, of John Brown, against Clement Brown, as the administrator of Jacob Hackler, deceased, and Benjamin A. … John Brown, the real plaintiff, seeks in this count to enforce a demand which he claims in his own individual right and not as the representative of all persons interested in the estate.

Carpenter v. Board of Apportionment

218 Ark. 404 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1951

In extenuation the Board says that when it met January 26th, 1951, official census figures by counties were not available. Attached to the response is a telegram from Roy V. … The principle thought by the respondents to be applicable was discussed in Childers v. Duvall, 69 Ark. 336 , 63 S. W. 802 .

Daniels v. Board of Directors

84 Ark. 333 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 11, 1907

This is an action instituted by appellant against the Board of Directors of St. … Co. v. Walbrink, 47 Ark. 330 . To the same effect see St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Hanks, 80 Ark. 417 ; Bracy v. St. Louis, S. F. & N. O. Rd. Co., 79 Ark. 124 .

Arkansas State Medical Board v. Byers

521 S.W.3d 459 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 8, 2017

JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice The Arkansas State Medical Board (“Board”) and Peggy Cryer, individually and in her official capacity as Executive Secretary of the Board, appeal from the circuit court’s order denying … Dorey, 2013 Ark. 346, 429 S.W.3d 234; Solomon v. Valco, Inc., 288 Ark. 106, 702 S.W.2d 6 (1986); Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v.

Rice-Brown Lumber Co. v. Fleetwood

134 Ark. 340 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1918

Pickens v. Board of Apportionment

220 Ark. 145 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1952

In a cause styled Smith v. The Board of Apportionment, 219 Ark. 611 , 243 S. W. 2d 755 , the directive was that Pulaski county, or the senatorial district of which it became a part, be given at least three senators. … Effect of the Board’s action was to reduce the number of districts from 34 to 33. Section 5 of Amendment 23 allows 30 days for appeals from the Board.