Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.36s
Brown Paper Mill Co. v. Warnix
222 Ark. 417 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1953
Cited 14 timesPublishedFord's Inc. v. Russell Brown & Co.
299 Ark. 426 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 10, 1989
Cameron v. Montgomery, 225 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1975); Atkins v. Crosland, 417 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. 1967); see also, Moonie v. Lynch, 256 Cal. App. 2d 361 , 64 Cal. Rptr. 55 (1967); Feldman v. … Stroud v. Ryan, 297 Ark. 472 , 763 S.W.2d 76 (1989); Lane v. Lane, 295 Ark. 671 , 752 S.W.2d 25 (1988); Riggs v. Thomas, 283 Ark. 148 , 671 S.W.2d 756 (1984).
Cited 22 timesPublishedMilwaukee Mechanics Insurance v. Brown
202 Ark. 537 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 1941
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown Properties, Inc. v. Looper
293 Ark. 133 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 20, 1987
Hughes v. Lee, 238 Ark. 547 , 383 S.W.2d 97 (1964) and Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Brown, 283 Ark. 1 , 670 S.W.2d 441 (1984). … Ampagoomian v. Atamian, 81 N.E.2d 843 (Mass. 1948).
Cited 1 timesPublishedWalt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Brown
283 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 11, 1984
Appellant, Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.., sold a car to appellee, Judy Brown. The car was represented by the salesman and by the sales slip to be a “new demonstrator.” … Phillips v. Graves, 219 Ark. 806 , 245 S.W.2d 394 (1952); Boston Ins. Co. v. Farmer, 234 Ark. 1007 , 356 S.W.2d 434 (1962); Garrett v. Trimune, 254 Ark. 79 , 491 S.W.2d 586 (1973); L. L. Cole & Son Inc. v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedFiremen's Pension Fund v. Brown
290 Ark. 611 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 22, 1986
Brown, sustained a back injury on his job as a city fireman on January 28, 1984. He received workers’ compensation benefits culminating in a joint workers’ compensation petition on January 23, 1985. … Although § 19-2206 provides that no person shall receive a pension unless the certificates have been filed, obiter dicta in Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund for the City of Pine Bluff v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSimpson v. Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Co.
70 Ark. 598 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 11, 1902
This is an action brought by the Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Company against D. M. Simpson and wife to foreclose a mortgage. … Watkins v. Martin, 69 Ark. 311 ; Wood on Limitations (3d Ed.), § 116. As we see the record, nothing is shown to take the case out of the statute.
Cited 10 timesPublishedBrown v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
300 Ark. 241 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1989
In Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 292 Ark. 558 , 732 S.W.2d 130 (1987), we reversed and remanded the case to the trial court on a point concerning the statute of limitations. … dismissed without prejudice to a future action by the plaintiff before the final submission of the case to the jury, or to the court where the trial is by the court____” A similar issue has been decided by this court in Duty v.
Cited 7 timesPublished3 Ark. 324 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1848
The facts in these cases are similar to those in the preceding case of Miller v. Barkeloo et al., and the principles decided are the same.
Cited 0 timesPublished139 Ark. 536 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1919
Cited 0 timesPublished148 Ark. 443 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 9, 1921
Brown and T. G. … Pursuant to the demand, Brown’s father delivered the property to the receiver. Appellant J. M. Brown, who is the brother of E. D.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Brown
256 Ark. 54 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1974
Appellant relies upon Caldwell v. … Hartz Seed Co. v. Thomas, 253 Ark. 176 , 485 S.W. 2d 200 (1972).
Cited 8 timesPublishedBrown v. St. Vincent Infirmary
266 Ark. 521 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 24, 1979
Brown obtained a judgment against James Brown, Jr. in a divorce proceeding for past due child support in the amount of $1450. … Vincent Infirmary employs 6 people to answer writs of garnishment on its employees (James Brown, Jr. had had about 20 other writs of garnishment filed against him). Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished22 Ark. 359 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 1860
Brown, by attorney, comes and defends the wrong and injury when &c., and prays judgment of the writ in this cause, because he says that the said plaintiffs before, and at the time, and' after the commencement of this suit
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Pacific Railroad v. Brown
195 Ark. 1060 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1938
Co. v. Pontius, 157 U. S. 209 , 15 S. Ct. 585 , 39 L. Ed. 675 ; Daley v. Boston & A. R. Co., 147 Mass. 101 , 16 N. E. 690 ; St. L. S. W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Thornton, 46 Tex. Civ. App. 649 , 103 S. W. 437 ; Orendorff v. … W. 419 ; Ry. v. Ingram, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCORNELL BROWN v. STATE OF ARKANSAS
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2025
CIRCUIT COURT V. … Bush v. State, 2024 Ark. 77, at 7, 687 S.W.3d 570, 574.
Cited 0 timesPublished253 Ark. 1084 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 26, 1973
Co. v. Kemp and Hambrick v. … See also Ray Dodge, Inc v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Kennedy Well Works, Inc.
302 Ark. 213 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 7, 1990
Sharum v. Meriwether, 156 Ark. 331 , 246 S.W. 501 (1923); Carraway v. Moore, 75 Ark. 146 , 86 S.W. 993 (1905); and Currie v. Franklin, 51 Ark. 338 , 11 S.W. 477 (1888), citing Redmond v. … Anderson, 18 Ark. 449 (1857); In Levinson v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPrice-Snapp-Jones Co. v. Brown
184 Ark. 1143 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 18, 1932
The only error argued for a reversal of the judgment is that the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial brings the case within the rule announced in Twist v. Mullinix, 126 Ark. 427 , 190 S. … Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. Ellenwood, 123 Ark. 428 , 185 S. W. 768 ; and Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Muldrow, 181 Ark. 674 , 27 S. W. (2d) 516 .
Cited 3 timesPublished20 Ark. 209 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1859
This was an action of debt, brought in the name of the State, for the use of Brown & Bean, against Crow, as sheriff of Clark county, and Sloan and Thornton, as his securities. … The substance of the breach of the bond assigned in the declaration is, that under an execution which came to the hands of Crow, as sheriff, he sold the steamboat Arkadclphia, the property of Brown & Bean, for less than two-thirds
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna