Case law

Brown v. State

62 Ark. 126 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 29, 1896

Larry Brown was indicted by the grand jury of the Eastern district of Lawrence county, at the September term, 1895, for the crime of robbery, alleged to have been committed in the forcible taking of the sum of $205 from the … There was evidence tending to show that the defendant was guilty of either robbery or larceny, which must be determined from the evidence, and the principles of law applicable thereto, as laid down in the case of Routt v.

Sparling v. Refunding Board

189 Ark. 189 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 30, 1934

The executive State officers are now members of various boards and have, for a long period of time served thereon, such as the State Board of Election Commissioners, State Burning Board, State Printing Board, etc., and many … Co. v.

Watkins v. Brown

5 Ark. 197 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1843

Brown v. Fleming

3 Ark. 284 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1841

Nisbett v. Brown

30 Ark. 585 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1875

Siznpson; by him endorsed to Brown & Norton, and protested for non-payment 14th January, 1873. … In Mays v.

Brown v. Stanford

22 Ark. 76 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 1860

Brown, 17 Arks. 449, if was adjudged that Brown, the plaintiff below, and now the appellant, could not maintain replevin for the negro sued for, as he was not entitled to its immediate possession at the beginning of the suit … Upon the second trial, which was had before the court, by consent, no legal evidence was given that the negro sued for was not in possession of Brown, the plaintiff, at the time the suit was begun; nor do we see how the verdict

Levy v. Brown

6 Ark. 16 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1850

The state of case, as testified by Brown before the justice and that detailed by him in the circuit court, according to the affidavit, are essentially variant, and as a necessary consequence calculated to produce very different … He stated in his affidavit that his witness, Brown, had testified under oath before another court in the same case, and between the same parties, that he the said Brown had loaned the money to the said defendant, for which

Jeffrey Brown v. State of Arkansas

2021 Ark. 189 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 2021

V. … Marek v. State, 2020 Ark. 203.

Jeffery Brown v. State of Arkansas

2023 Ark. 27 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 2023

The circuit court dismissed Brown’s petition. We affirmed the circuit court’s dismissal in Brown v. Hobbs, 2014 Ark. 267. … Brown v Hobbs, 2014 Ark. 267. This current filing constitutes abuse of the writ. We have applied the abuse-of-the writ doctrine 66 times, most recently in Trammel v.

Brown v. Arkoma Coal Corp.

276 Ark. 322 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 14, 1982

Troy Brown argues that Arkoma, by filing the pleading, consented to the sale and falls within the category of “otherwise” authorizing the sale. … Orsby v. McGee, 271 Ark. 268 , 608 S.W.2d 22 (1980). The trial court’s finding regarding the Ford truck is reversed and remanded and the remainder of the judgment is affirmed.

Beneux v. Brown Shoe Company

191 Ark. 579 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 4, 1935

Harrison v. Lamar, 33 Ark. 824 ; Wilson v. Massie, 70 Ark. 25 , 65 S. W. 942 ; Connertin v. Concannon, 122 Ore. 387 , 259 Pac. 290 ; 21 C. J. 914. The estate of H. A.

Clay County v. Brown Lumber Co.

90 Ark. 413 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 10, 1909

Welty on Assessments, § 154; x Cooley on Taxation, 782; Equalization Board v. Landowners, 51 Ark. 516 ; Board of Equalization Cases, supra. … Saline County v. Hughes, 84 Ark. 347 .

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Brown

186 Ark. 339 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 1932

Co. v. Rogers, 184 Ark. 725 , 43 S. … Co. v. Elvins, 176 Ark. 737 , 4 S. W. (2d) 528 .

Ernest Brown v. State of Arkansas

2019 Ark. 348 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 21, 2019

Hall v. … Griffin v. State, 2018 Ark. 10, 535 S.W.3d 261; see also Green v.

Ethridge v. Alexander Brown & Associates

258 Ark. 444 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 7, 1975

Brown. The appellant testified that Mr. Brown hired him through Mr. Brown’s son; that Mr. Brown directed his work on cotton picking machines and that Mr. Brown paid him his hourly wages. Mr. … George Alexander Brown and was working on a cotton picking machine owned either by Mr. Brown or Mr. Brown’s company. Mr.

Brown v. Wyandotte & Southeastern Railway Co.

68 Ark. 134 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1900

Niemeyer & Darragh v. Little Rock Junction Railway, 43 Ark. 112 . It is said in Railway v. … Osier v. Hobbs, 33 Ark. 215 ; Cantrell v. Clark, 47 Ark. 239 .

Gary Brown v. State of Arkansas

639 S.W.3d 875 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 2022

Brown v. State, 2021 Ark. App. 369.  The evidence adduced at trial demonstrated that in June 2019, Brown stole a courtesy van from the Guest Inn and Suites in Little Rock. Id. … Coram nobis is not the proper remedy to challenge an allegedly illegal sentence, and Brown’s claim that his sentence was excessive fails. Key v. State, 2019 Ark. 202, 575 S.W.3d 554.

Brown v. Arkansas Central Power Co.

174 Ark. 177 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 23, 1927

Co. v. … Gus Blass Co. v. Reinman, 102 Ark. 294 , 143 S. W. 1087 ; Cox v. Smith, 93 Ark. 371 , 125 S. W. 437 , 137 Am. St. Rep. 89 ; Moore v. Exelby, 170 Ark. 908 , 281 S.

Brown v. Pine Bluff Nursing Home

359 Ark. 471 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 2, 2004

As we said in Vassallo v. … See Nelson v. Schubert, 98 Wash.

Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

292 Ark. 558 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1987

Appellants’ claim that Brown’s death was not the result of a “medical injury” does not square with this court’s position in Sexton v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 275 Ark. 361 , 631 S.W.2d 270 (1982). … Murillo v. Good Samaritan Hospital of Anaheim, 99 Cal. App. 3d 50 , 160 Cal. Rptr. 33 (1979).