Case law

Brown v. City of Stuttgart

312 Ark. 97 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1993

Brown, argues that the lease violates Article 16, § 1, of the Arkansas Constitution. We agree. The words of the Constitution “should ordinarily be given their obvious and natural meaning.” Gipson v. … Brown, J., concurs. Hays, J., dissents.

Brown v. Adept, Inc.

242 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1967

from pumping, and the court further directed that the surety bond made by Brown be continued in effect. … In Harahan Viaduct Improvement District v. Martineau, 172 Ark. 189 , 288 S. W. 10 , the question here presented was passed upon by this court.

Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Courson

312 Ark. 363 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 1993

In Henry, Walden & Davis v. … See Covington v. Rhodes, 38 N.C. App. 68 , 247 S.E.2d 305 (1978); see also Sohn v. Brockington, Fla. App., 371 So.2d 1089 (1979); Tobias v. King, Ill. App., 406 N.E.2d 101 (1980); Phelps v.

Brown v. People's Bank

150 Ark. 356 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1921

He claimed the property as exempt, and that claim was sustained by this court in the case of People’s Bank of Searcy v. Brown, 136 Ark. 517 . The opinion in that case was delivered May 6th, 1918. … That Brown was insolvent, and Bell was holding the title for Brown’s benefit.

German-American Insurance v. Brown

75 Ark. 251 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1905

Paul to Brown. … Co. v. Kilpatrick, 67 Ark. 47 ; Klein v. German Nat. Bank, 69 Ark. 140 ; Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Schmaltz, 66 Ark. 588 ; 1 Thompson on Trials, § § 706, 707; Elliott, App. Proc. § 626; Reynolds v.

Brown & Hackney, Inc. v. Stephenson

157 Ark. 470 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 12, 1923

Lamb & Rhodes v. Howton, 131 Ark. 211 ; Hilger v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co., 139 Ark. 400 , and other cases cited in Cumulative Sup. Crawford’s Ark. Dig., title Certiorari, §§ 4,12; Stroud v. … Conine, 114 Ark. 304 -09; Caroline v. Caroline, 47 Ark. 511 ; Gregg v. Hatcher, 94 Ark. 54 ; Griffin v. Boswell, 124 Ark. 234 ; and numerous oases cited in 1 Crawford’s Digest, p. 908 (Certiorari).

Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson

321 Ark. 150 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1995

See Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Courson, 312 Ark. 363 , 849 S.W.2d 938 (1993) (C&B I); Crockett & Brown P.A. v. Wilson, 314 Ark. 578 , 864 S.W.2d 244 (1993) (C&B II). … In fact, this court held in Crockett & Brown, P.A. v.

State Bank v. Brown

7 Ark. 94 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1851

Webb & Taylor v. Brown

3 Ark. 488 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1841

Brown v. Summerlin Associates, Inc.

272 Ark. 298 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 13, 1981

Brown, purchased a 100-acre tract of land to be known as the Hillsboro Subdivision. As a condition of the purchase he required the seller to have the property surveyed. … Howell, et al v. Worth James Const. Co., 259 Ark. 627 , 535 S.W. 2d 826 (1976). Finally, the appellant argues that prejudgment interest was improperly allowed.

International Harvester Company v. Brown

241 Ark. 452 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 21, 1966

This is the interpretation placed on the statute in Terry v. Plunket-Jarrell Grocery Co., 220 Ark. 3 , 246 S. W. 2d 415 , and we think the decision is sound. … See: Harger v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 195 Ark. 107 , 111 S. W. 2d 485 . Writ granted.

Brown, Admr. v. Cole, Admr.

198 Ark. 417 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 29, 1939

Brown as administrator, of the estate of John R. Kizer, deceased. … The court Avas correct in overruling the motion to abate the cause of action. (2) It is true that this court, in the case of Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.

Morley v. Brown & Root, Inc.

219 Ark. 82 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1951

District Court of Alabama has announced in the case of Ashwander et al. v. Tenn. Valley Authority et al., 8 Fed. … Similar announcements were made in Beggs v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co., 96 Ala. 295 , 11 So. 381 ; People v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 99 N. Y. 181 , 1 N. E. 669 ; and Kentucky Electric Co. v.

Walthour-Flake Co. v. Brown

228 Ark. 307 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 2, 1957

Brown and wife, Ruby M. Brown, appellees herein, purchased from Mary L. Wilkins, property located at 520 Brown Street in Little Rock. … of action set forth in her complaint; that the rights, status and liabilities of the parties to this action in connection with the matters set forth here-inbefore be ascertained, adjudged and declared by this Court; * * V’

Porter Foods, Inc. v. Brown

281 Ark. 148 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 19, 1983

Argument on the issue was held before the Honorable Gerald Brown, Circuit Judge, who held that venue was proper under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-347, and denied the motion to dismiss. … See also Murry v. Maner, 230 Ark. 132 , 320 S.W.2d 940 (1959); Finley v. Moose, 74 Ark. 217 (1905). In contrast, in Tucker Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartje, Judge, 278 Ark. 320 , 650 S.

Brown v. Patterson Construction Co.

235 Ark. 433 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 1, 1962

See Haggar, Administratrix v. Wortz Biscuit Company, 210 Ark. 318 , 196 S. W. 2d 1 , Kimpel, Guardian v. Garland Anthony Lumber Co., 216 Ark. 788 , 227 S. W. 2d 932 . … our holding in King v.

Howard's Laundry & Cleaners v. Brown

266 Ark. 460 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 10, 1979

Sisung v. Tiger Pass Shipyard Company, 303 F. 2d 318, 321-322 (5th Cir.1962). The appellant argues that Brown did not meet his burden of proof by showing that the drapes were delivered in good condition. … Cothren v. Kansas City Laundry Service Co., 242 S.W. 167 (Mo. Appl 1922). Certainly, Brown had offered sufficient evidence to shift the burden of proof, which the trial court had to find by virtue of its judgment.

Brown v. Southern Grocery Company

168 Ark. 547 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 13, 1925

Glasscock v. Rosengrant, 55 Ark. 376 . • When Brown shipped the nine bales of cotton to the Southern Grocery Company on the 11th day of December, 1919, he told it that he wanted to draw $125 a bale on it. … Davis v. Kobe, 36 Minn. 214 ; 1 Am. St. Rep. 663 ; Phillips v. Scott, 43 Mo. 86 ; 97 Am. Dec. 369 ; M. M. Walker Co. v. Dubuque Fruit & Produce Co., 113 Iowa 428 ; 53 L. R. A. 775; Blot v. Boiceau, 3 N. Y. 78 ; Am.

Lawhon Farm Services v. Brown

335 Ark. 276 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 3, 1998

984 S.W.2d 1 (1998) 335 Ark. 276 LAWHON FARM SERVICES, et al., Appellants, v. James R. BROWN, Appellee. No. 97-1564. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 3, 1998. *2 Betty J. Demory, Little Rock, for appellants. … Brown in accordance with the interpretation of that term in Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Smith, supra . The requirement of "actual dependency," added to the statute in 1979, as interpreted in Roach Mfg. Co. v.

Skelton Motor Co. v. Brown

234 Ark. 500 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 22, 1962

At the trial the appellant contended that Brown should not be permitted to testify that Keith Skelton orally released the Browns from liability. … Weaver v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co., 146 Ark. 379 , 225 S. W. 624 .