Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.55s
66 Ark. 361 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 15, 1899
The petition and exceptions filed by Brown in the county court raised the question whether he was entitled to be declared the purchaser of the lands, instead of Gates. … Queen v. Justices of Berkshire, 4 Q. B. Div. 469.
Cited 0 timesPublished24 Ark. 248 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1866
filed his prayer of oyer, which was granted, and Brown made no further defence. … the amendment to be made, to which Brown excepted, and saying nothing further, judgment was rendered against Fletcher and Brown, and Brown brings the case by writ of error to this court.
Cited 0 timesPublished149 Ark. 588 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 26, 1921
And if you believe from the evidence in this case that the defendant, Brown, shot and killed the deceased, Will Britt, while the said Britt was attempting to take away the property of the defendant, Brown, then the killing … "Wharton on Homicide (3 ed.), pp. 390-91; Utterbach v. Commonwealth, 105 Ky. 723 , 88 Am. St. Rep. 329 ; State v. Tarter, 26 Ore. 38 ; Hill v. State, 43 Texas Criminal Appeal, 583.
Cited 2 timesPublished300 Ark. 201 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 16, 1989
William Lee Fergus, Elizabeth Gammon Brown’s attorney, has filed a motion on behalf of Brown for rule on clerk. For the reasons stated below, we remand to the trial court for further proceedings. … Lewis v. State, 295 Ark. 165 , 747 S.W.2d 91 (1988).
Cited 1 timesPublished240 Ark. 974 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 1966
See Kotz v. Rush, 218 Ark. 692 , 238 S. W. 2d 634 (1951). The only question here is whether the chancellor was right in finding that the purchasers failed to prove their defense by a preponderance of the evidence. … Moreover, in. the course of the negotiations Brown introduced Williams to the secretary of the company for which both Brown and Williams contracted to raise chickens.
Cited 1 timesPublished162 Ark. 175 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 1924
The insistence is made that, under the act of the Legislature of 1919 creating a county board -of education, the exclusive jurisdiction to change the boundary lines of school districts was transferred from the county court … to the county board of education.
Cited 8 timesPublished247 Ark. 500 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 3, 1969
Barrineau v. Brown, 240 Ark. 599 , 401 S. W. 2d 30 (1966). … Similarly, the gift to Brown did not pass through the hands of Mrs. Anderson’s personal representative, but Brown was nevertheless a beneficiary of her taxable estate.
Cited 1 timesPublished269 Ark. 114 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 7, 1980
Earl v. Clark, 219 N.W. 2d 487 (1974). See also Ross v. St. Louis I.M. & S. Ry. Co., 120 Ark. 264 , 179 S.W. 353 (1915). … Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 386 U.S. 714 (1967).
Cited 13 timesPublished168 Ark. 278 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 23, 1925
In Griffin v. … In Clear Creek Oil & Gas Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished316 Ark. 336 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 14, 1994
Brown, Justice. … Landfill, Inc. v. State, supra; American Trucking Ass’n v. Gray, 280 Ark. 258 , 657 S.W.2d 207 (1983).
Cited 13 timesPublished190 Ark. 894 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 6, 1935
Anderson v. Yell, 15 Ark. 9 ; Sevier v. Holliday, 2 Ark. 512 . The doctrine thus stated was applied in the subsequent cases of White v. Canada, 25 Ark. 41 ; Hazard v. White, 26 Ark. 155 ; Winston v. … Periman v. Rogers, 187 Ark. 565 , 61 S. W. (2d) 59 ; Conn v. Atkins, (Ky.) 13 S. W. (2d) 759 .
Cited 0 timesPublished206 Ark. 454 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1943
In Dozier v. Ragsdale, 186 Ark. 654 , 55 S. … In McCamey v. Wright, 96 Ark. 477 , 132 S.
Cited 0 timesPublished203 Ark. 1029 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 16, 1942
The exact point was ruled adversely to appellant in O’Neal v. State, 195 Ark. 357 , 112 S. … Baker v. State, 58 Ark. 513 , 25 S. W. 603 ; State v. Johnson, 38 Ark. 568 .”
Cited 0 timesPublished206 Ark. 410 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 29, 1943
Brown intervened and alleged title in himself, under a deed from the State Land Commissioner, and the real issues in the case appear from the answer which he filed. … Lumsden v. Erstine, 205 Ark. 1004 , 172 S. W. 2d 409 ; Dansby v. Weeks, 199 Ark. 497 , 135 S. W. 2d 62 ; Powell v. Coggins, 204 Ark. 739 , 164 S. W. 2d 891 ; Wilson v. Triplett, 204 Ark. 902 , 165 S.
Cited 0 timesPublished188 Ark. 103 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 6, 1933
Lowmack v. State, 178 Ark. 928 , 12 S. W. (2d) 909 . … Taylor v. State, ante p. 8. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished136 Ark. 517 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 6, 1918
Harris v. Ray, 107 Ark. 281 . -The finding here is sustained by legally sufficient evidence, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Cited 6 timesPublished348 Ark. 518 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 9, 2002
See Ragar v. … See Ford’s, Inc. v. Russell Brown & Co., 299 Ark. 426 , 773 S.W.2d 90 (1989).
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna