Case law

Brown v. State

330 Ark. 239 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 16, 1997

See State v. McCann, 313 Ark. 286 , 853 S.W.2d 886 (1993). In addition, the State had the duty to show it had made a diligent, good-faith effort to bring the accused, Brown, to trial. Chandler v. … The trial court obviously concluded that Brown was not being completely forthright in contending she was unaware of the scheduled hearing. See Allen v.

Brown v. State

288 Ark. 517 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 14, 1986

See Foote’s Dixie Dandy, Inc. v. McHenry, 270 Ark. 816 , 607 S.W.2d 323 (1980) and AP&L v. Arkansas Public Service Commission, 275 Ark. 164 , 628 S.W.2d 555 (1982). … Gibbs v. State, 255 Ark. 957 , 504 S.W.2d 719 (1974). II Ark. Stat.

Brown v. Harrell

40 Ark. 429 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1883

His promise to be answerable for the board was a promise to pay his own debt, not theirs. … Townsley v. Sumrall, 2 Peters, 170 ; Emerson v. Slater, 22 Howard, 28 ; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, sec. 195. The judgment which was against the defendant, must be affirmed.

Pillow v. Brown

26 Ark. 240 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1870

At the fall term, 1865, the death of Pointer was suggested, and suit was revived in the name of Brown & Childress, as •executors of Pointer, deceased. … Hoare v. Allen, 2 Dallas, 102 ; Bouvier Law, Dic. Int.,s. 12 and 18; Yeaton v. Berney, 3 Legal New. 82; Bigler v. Waller, Ib. 26; Conn. v. Penn, 1 Pet. c. c. 496; Ward v. Smith, 7 Wal. 452.

Brown v. Wall

206 Ark. 576 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1944

The Metropolitan decision was followed in Edwards v. Nall, 200 Ark. 9 , 137 S. W. 2d 748 , and also in the case of Bolin v. Kelley, 205 Ark. 539 , 169 S. W. 2d 865 . … In Britt v. Harper, 132 Ark. 193 , 200 S.

State v. Brown

83 Ark. 44 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 1907

He asked Brown to sell him some whisky, and Brown replied he could not, but that he would loan him some, and he told Brown to let him have one or two bottles. Brown then let him have the two bottles. … Kinne v. Kinne, 45 Howard’s Practice Reports, 61.

Stout v. Brown

67 Ark. 481 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 24, 1900

The opinion delivered when it washere the firsttime is reported in 64 Ark. 312 (Stout v. Brown). The facts, as stated in that opinion, are as follows: “ W. W. Brown brought suit against J. P. Sewell and C. R. … Hill v. Draper, 63 Ark. 141 . But the record shows that the greater part of the lumber was sold to the appellee, W. W. Brown, for $150.75, and that the remainder was sold to J. M.

Sellers v. Brown

228 Ark. 353 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 1957

On the former appeal there was involved the title to the Assembly of God Chnreh at 20th and Broadway, Little Rock, Arkansas, Sellers v. Brown, 225 Ark. 989 , 287 S. W. 2d 471 . … At this stage appellees Brown, and Shaw as trustee, filed “Affidavit for General Attachment ’ ’ in which they alleged: ‘ ‘ Plaintiffs Durwood Brown et al., as trustees for the Central Assembly of God Church, allege judgments

Stout v. Brown

64 Ark. 312 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 9, 1897

Brown brought suit against J. P. Sewell andC. R. Stout, and attached certain lots, also 48,000 feet of lumber. … Sowards v. Pritchett, 37 Ill. 518 ; Harlan v. Murrell, 3 Dana (Ky.), 181.

Ligon v. Brown

363 Ark. 195 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 1, 2005

Brown, Sr. Mr. Brown has filed an answer, and the issues appear to be joined by the pleadings.

Primrose v. Brown

173 Ark. 632 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1927

Brown v. Polk

230 Ark. 377 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 13, 1959

Starling v. Hamner, 185 Ark. 930 , 50 S. W. 2d 612 ; Hirsch v. Perkins, 211 Ark. 388 , 200 S. W. 2d 796 ; Hughes v. Holden, 229 Ark. 15 , 316 S. W. 2d 710 . … It is now contended, on the authority of Edwards v. Rumph, 48 Ark. 479 , 3 S. W. 635 , and Humphrey v. McCauley, 55 Ark. 143 , 17 S.

Brown v. Bridges

227 Ark. 1006 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 17, 1957

Appellant contends that this was the only question which remained open for proof, under the mandate and Opinion in Brown v. Bridges, 222 Ark. 669 , 262 S. W. 2d 145 , and that she must accordingly prevail. … Perhaps the mandate and Opinion in Brown v.

Ligon v. Brown

363 Ark. 95 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 1, 2005

Brown v. Buck

54 Ark. 453 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 2, 1891

Brown v. State

298 Ark. 396 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 17, 1989

On appeal, Brown contends the Rule 37 court erred in failing to (1) conduct an evidentiary hearing; (2) obtain a transcript of prior proceedings; and (3) grant his petition. … Davis v. Wingfield, 297 Ark. 57 , 759 S.W.2d 219 (1988). Because Brown did not abstract the court’s order denying the petition, we must affirm. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 9(d). Affirmed.

Robert v. Brown

157 Ark. 230 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1923

Boynton Land & Lumber Co. v. Hawkins, 122 Ark. 374 . The judgment is correct, and it is therefore affirmed.

Brown v. Mitchell

228 Ark. 106 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1957

Mulkey v. White, 219 Ark. 441 , 242 S. W. 2d 836 . … In Parker v. Sims, 185 Ark. 1111 , 51 S. W. 2d 517 , we reaffirmed the following rule announced in Trumbull v. Harris, 114 Ark. 493 , 170 S.

State v. Brown

265 Ark. 41 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 19, 1979

The statute Brown was charged with violating reads: ... … Buck v. Steel, Judge, 263 Ark. 249 , 564 S.W. 2d 215 (1978). Act 464, as we have referred to herein, prohibits promotion only where consideration is involved.

Brown v. Wilkes

153 Ark. 545 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1922

Turner v. Watkins, 31 Ark. 429 ; Richmond v. Mississippi Mills, 52 Ark. 30 ; State v. Dupuy, 52 Ark. 48 ; Fecheimer v. Robertson, 53 Ark. 101 . … In Phelps v.