Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

2.18s

  • Brown v. Creekmore

    141 Ark. 512 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 19, 1920

    Brown, and defendant, Lynch Creekmore, by his attorney, E. L. … of the items ■constituting the counterclaim. • It was not competent to contradict by parol testimony the affirmative and unambiguous recitals of the decree concerning the subject-matter of the court’s ruling, Quisenberry v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Henderson

    66 Ark. 302 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 25, 1899

    Jones v. Duffy, 119. Ind. 440. No question is raised here as to the regularity of the action or report of the viewers, but only as to the correctness of their finding.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Norvell

    74 Ark. 484 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1905

    A commissioner’s deed from commissioner in chancery to Pickett, in case wherein Board of Directors of St. Francis. Levee District was plaintiff, and various land owners were defendants. … Undey the decision of this court, in Trotter v. Neal, 50 Ark. 340 , this, gave paintiff a legal title, if those allegations were true.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Welch

    151 Ark. 142 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 19, 1921

    Counsel for appellee rely on decisions of. this court in other cases where the statute is different; for instance, the case of Phillips County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Doneghey

    46 Ark. 497 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1885

    This case is ruled by the ease of Garrett Bros. v. Wade, ante. The appellee’s property was held by a constable under execution. … Winter v. Simpson, 42 Ark., 411.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hicks

    1 Ark. 232 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1838

    Brown, executor as aforesaid, a certain mulatto slave named Sylvia-, about 35 years of age, belonging to and being part of the estate of John Phillips, deceased, heretofore unadministered upon, of great value, to wit, of … Brown, executor as aforesaid, to the said Arthur Hicks, administrator as aforesaid, when he, the said Richard C. S. Brown, executor as aforesaid, should be thereunto after-wards requested; yet the said Richard C. S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Callaway

    41 Ark. 418 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1883

    Brown, Jr., to Sophia Reading, This note had been endorsed and placed in the hands of the Merchants National Bank as collateral security for a loan of $250, made by the bank to said firm. … The receiver recovered, not the full amount of Brown’s note, but the amount of the bank’s note against the Scarborough firm, which Brown’s note was given to secure.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Vaughan

    184 Ark. 364 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1931

    Vaughan v. Screeton, 183 Ark. 816 , 39 S. W. (2d) 299 . No error appearing, the decree is affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Blakemore v. Brown

    142 Ark. 293 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 23, 1920

    Hilliard v. Bunker, 68 Ark. 340 ; Alexander v. Capps, 100 Ark. 488 ; Morris v. Levy Lumber Co., 103 Ark. 579 . … This brings the case within the rule announced by this court in Hilliard v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    375 Ark. 479 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 30, 2009

    The State of Arkansas appeals from the circuit court’s grant of Appellee John Brown’s Rule 37 petition. … The record reveals that at the conclusion of the hearing on Brown’s Rule 37 petition, the circuit court requested that the parties submit posthearing briefs in lieu of oral arguments.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    213 Ark. 989 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 1948

    Some of the more recent being Higdon v. State, ante, p. 881, 213 S. W. 2d 621 ; Washington v. State, ante, p. 218, 210 S. W. 2d 307 ; Penton v. State, 194 Ark. 503 , 109 S. W. 2d 131 ; and Smith, et al. v. … Ct. 111 ; Bolin v. Nebraska, 176 U. S. 83 , 44 L. Ed. 382 , 20 S. Ct. 287 ; and Gaines v. Washington, 277 U. S. 81 , 72 L. Ed. 793 , 48 S. Ct. 468 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gardner

    232 Ark. 197 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 9, 1960

    School District No. 18 of Jackson County v. Grubbs Special School District, 184 Ark. 863 , 43 S. W. 2d 765 . … Rural Special School District No. 50 v. First National Bank, 173 Ark. 604 , 292 S. W. 1012 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    291 Ark. 143 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 2, 1987

    Strickland v. Washington, supra; Hill v. Lockhart, supra; Haywood v. State, 288 Ark. 266 , 704 S.W.2d 168 (1986); and Crockett v. State, 282 Ark. 582 , 669 S.W.2d 896 (1984). … Hill v. Lockhart, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ennis

    69 Ark. 123 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 2, 1901

    In Acruman v. … In Farnsworth v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hine v. Brown

    135 Ark. 393 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 8, 1918

    Ard v. Bowie, 125 Ark. 169 . It is true that J. W. Brown would have had the right to withdraw this money from Taz D. Hunt for the purpose of paying it back to Hine. But, if J. W. … We think the facts bring this case within the principles decided in Home Land Loan Co. v. Routh, 123 Ark. 360 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Clifton v. Brown

    253 Ark. 148 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 2, 1972

    The jury returned a general verdict, to wit: “We, the jury, find for the plaintiff, Claudia Brown, on her complaint against James Clifton and Jack Conrad, and assess her damages in the sum of $13,-940.00.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Stair

    227 Ark. 757 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 22, 1957

    There was a judgment in favor of Stair against both Smith and Brown. Brown has appealed. … The principal issues on appeal are whether Brown and Smith are joint tort-feasors, and whether there is any substantial evidence of negligence on the part of Brown.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    159 Ark. 498 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 18, 1923

    Under a statute not making such an exception, it is no defense that the Aveapon was carried within the curtilage of defendant’s abode. ’ ’ In Kinkead v. … The language quoted was somewhat qualified in the case of Clark v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bell

    291 Ark. 116 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 1987

    The appellant, Dolly Brown, is the widow of Lloyd I. Brown. The appellee, Brenda Bell, is the daughter of Lloyd I. Brown and executrix of his estate. … Norton v. Norton, 227 Ark. 799 , 302 S.W.2d 78 (1957.) She also cites Dunn v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Roetzel v. Brown

    321 Ark. 187 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1995

    and Joseph Brown, individually and as parents and next friends of their minor child, Joey Brown, also a separate appellee. … Co. v. White, 302 Ark. 193 , 788 S.W.2d 483 (1990).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.