Case law

Sebastian County Chapter of the American Red Cross v. Weatherford

311 Ark. 656 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 1, 1993

Brown, Justice. … At the meeting of the Fort Smith Board of Directors on December 6, 1983, a resolution was adopted authorizing a lease agreement between the City and the Red Cross.

Rochester v. State

250 Ark. 758 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 24, 1971

This testimony was given by Officer Brown and it was stipulated that Officer Com-stock, if called to testify, would testify substantially the same as Brown. … Wimberly v. State, 240 Ark. 345 , 399 S. W. 2d 274 , and Shepherd v. State, 221 Ark. 191 , 252 S. W. 2d 621 . Certainly, there was here no surprise that could have resulted in prejudice.

Arkansas Department of Health José R. Romero, M.D., in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Health, Arkansas Department of Health Arkansas Board of Hearing Instrument Dispensers And Stephanie Pratt, in Her Official Capacity as Executive Director, Arkansas Board of Hearing Instrument Dispensers v. Samuel Solomon

2022 Ark. 43 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 24, 2022

See Silkman v. … As we explained in Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas v.

Welch v. State

364 Ark. 324 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 8, 2005

As we recently stated in State v. … In support of this argument, Welch cites State v. Brown, 356 Ark. 460 , 156 S.W.3d 722 (2004), where police officers obtained consent to search a home by means of the knock-and-talk procedure.

City of Little Rock v. Raines

241 Ark. 1071 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1967

Brown gave for the plan to sell or lease the property acquired to private business was the inability of anyone to make money out of it and the fact that the project is a non-profit venture. … Woods v. Haas, 229 Ark. 1007 , 320 S. W. 2d 655 ; Portis v. Board of Public Utilities of Lepanto, 213 Ark. 201 , 209 S. W. 2d 864 ; City of Hot Springs v. Gray, 215 Ark. 243 , 219 S. W. 2d 930 .

Swerdsfeger v. State

21 Kan. 475 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1879

(Clough v. McDonald, 18 Kas. 114 .) … (McLaughlin v. The State, 10 Kas. 586 ; Ingram v. The State, 10 Kas. 630 ; Jennings v. The State, 13 Kas. 90 ; Barkley v. The State, 15 Kas. 99 ; Gen. Stat., p.844, § 154.)

Wells v. Purcell

267 Ark. 456 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 31, 1979

See Radel Concrete Products, Inc. v. Clermont County Board of Health, 107 Ohio App. 159 , 152 N.E. 2d 307 (1957). … Dudley, 264 Ark. 697 , 574 S.W. 2d 658 ; Brown v. Curtis, supra. Mandamus may not be used to determine in advance what the petitioners’ rights are or the action to be taken shall be. Bunting v. Tedford, supra.

Fitzpatrick v. Owens

124 Ark. 167 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 29, 1916

Peters v. Peters, 42 Ia. 142 ; Abbott v. Abbott, 67 Me. 304 ; Freethy v. Freethy, 42 Barb. (N. Y.) 641. … Brown v. Brown, 88 Conn. 42 , 89 Atl. 889 , 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 185. Fiedler v. Fiedler (Okla.), 140 Pac. 1022 , 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 189.

Klimas v. State

259 Ark. 301 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 15, 1976

The state does not actually contend that there was no error in the court’s sustaining an objection to the question whether Weeks was aware that the prosecuting attorney is asked to make a recommendation to the parole board … He found five walkie-talkie radios and a portable one in a brown paper bag in a closet. He also found two plastic containers with nickels, dimes and quarters in them in two different chests of drawers.

Bosnick v. Lockhart

283 Ark. 206 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 16, 1984

Davis v. Mabry, Director, 266 Ark. 487 , 585 S.W.2d 949 (1979); see also Poe v. Housewright. Comm’ner, 271 Ark. 771 , 610 S.W.2d 577 (1981). The same rule applies to this situation. … Supreme Court addressed this same issue in Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981).

City of Marianna v. Arkansas Municipal League

289 Ark. 473 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 14, 1986

We dismiss the appeal because the order appealed from is not a final order, a jurisdictional requirement which we are obliged to raise even when the parties do not. 3-W Lumber Co. v.

Collin County National Bank v. Laser Grain Co.

130 Ark. 396 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 1, 1917

V. … Bergman v. Sells, 39 Ark. 97 , and Excelsior Mfg. Co. v. Owens, 58 Ark. 556 .

Bachman v. State

235 Ark. 339 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 10, 1962

Four years later the legislature passed Act 432 of 1941 which complemented said Act 313 by giving a Board the right to fix minimum wages which a barber could charge. This act was tested in the case of Noble v. … See also: Town of Vestal v. Bennett, 199 Misc. 41 , 104 N. Y. S. 2d 830; City of New Orleans v. Southern Auto Wreckers, 193 La. 895 , 192 So. 523 ; and State v. Brown, 250 N. C. 54 , 108 S. E. 2d 74 .

Stay Strong, Status Quo, a Local Option Ballot Question Committee and Bevans Family Limited Partnership v. the Van Buren County Board of Election Commissioners; And Verna Hicks, in Her Official Capacity as Chair of the Van Buren COUNTY Board of Election Commissioners

2020 Ark. 329 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 2020

THE VAN BUREN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS; AND VERNA HICKS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIR OF THE VAN BUREN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS APPELLEES LET VAN BUREN COUNTY … Stay Strong raises the same issues in this case,1 which was filed against the Van Buren County Board of Election Commissioners.

Pickler v. Arkansas Packing Co.

112 Ark. 33 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 1914

He alleges that he signed the application and handed it to Brown with the distinct understanding and agreement that “said application was to be held by Brown and not to be delivered to the corporation until Brown received … Graham v. Remmel, 76 Ark. 140 ; Barton-Parker Mfg. Co. v. Taylor, 78 Ark. 586 ; Barr Cash & Package Carrier Co. v. Brooks-Ozan Mercantile Co., 82 Ark. 219 ; Main v. Oliver, 88 Ark. 383 ; American Sales Book Co. v.

Thompson v. State

88 Ark. 447 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 21, 1908

He did so with the intent to kill because Brown threatened to kill him and wanted his wife. There was no evidence that Brown made any effort to -kill him. … Jones v. State, 52 Ark. 345 ; Fagg v. State, 50 Ark. 506 ; Curtis v. State, 36 Ark. 284 . The evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. Judgment affirmed.

Potter v. City of Tontitown

371 Ark. 200 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 2007

In Blundell v. City of West Helena, 258 Ark. 123 , 522 S.W.2d 661 (1975), we adopted the rule set forth in Darlington v. … V.

Wunderlich v. Cates

213 Ark. 695 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 21, 1948

Brown’s occupancy. Brown was arrested, put in jail, and released on bond. He returned to the island and again undertook to occupy the tenant property. … Injunctive relief was upheld in Ritholtz v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry, 206 Ark. 671 , 177 S.

Caffey v. Caffey

274 Ark. 335 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 30, 1981

The trial court relied on the case of Brown v. Brown, 263 Ark. 189 , 563 S.W. 2d 444 (1978). For her appeal the appellant alleges (1) that the trial court erred in holding that the case of Brown v. … We think that Brown v. Brown, 263 Ark. 189 , 563 S.W. 2d 444 (1978), is controlling in this case.

King v. State

361 Ark. 402 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 14, 2005

Brown, Justice. … See Findley v. State, supra; Gardner v. State, supra.