Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

0.34s

  • Brown v. Haselman

    79 Ark. 213 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 28, 1906

    Another section of the same statute provides a penalty for keeping open dram-shops on the day of any election, but this court, in Stout v. State, 43 Ark. 414 , held that it did not apply to school elections. … This court refused to apply it in Stout v. State, supra, and we think the principles announced in the opinion in that case control this case. Affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Allbright

    110 Ark. 394 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 8, 1913

    Says Chief Justice Shaw, in Foster v. Mansfield, 3 Met. 412 , 37 Am. … See Grilley v. Atkins, 78 Conn. 386 , 2 Atl. 337 , 4 L. R A. (N. S.) 816.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Keaton

    232 Ark. 12 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1960

    Delamar v. Ward, 184 Ark. 82 , 41 S. W. 2d 760 ; Pollock Stores Co. v. Chatwell, 192 Ark. 83 , 90 8. W. 2d 213. … Co. v. Walker, 67 Ark. 147 , 53 S. W. 675 ; El Dorado & Bastrop R. Co. v. Whatley, 88 Ark. 20 , 114 S. W. 234 , 129 A. S. R. 93.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Venable v. Brown

    31 Ark. 564 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1876

    Brown on the Statute of Frauds, sec. 122; Collier v. Coates, 17 Barbour, 472 (in which the earlier New York cases are reviewed); Cobb v. Hall, 29 Vermont (3 Williams), 510; Coughlin v. … Knowles, 7 Metcalf (Mass.), 57; Duncan v. Baird & Co., 8 Dana (Ky.), 102; Lane v. Shackford, 5 New Hamp., 130; Sims v. Hutchins, 8 Smedes & Marsh., 328; Beaman v. Buck et al., 9 id., 207; Rhodes, adm’r, v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Summers v. Brown

    157 Ark. 509 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 12, 1923

    Kendrick, the board of equalization, and presented a resolution asking approval and indorsement of their action in reducing the assessment of all the real and personal property of St. … Saline County v. Hughes, 84 Ark. 347 . In fact, the equalization board had no right to equalize assessments of real estate at all in 1914.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gullett v. Brown

    307 Ark. 385 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 16, 1991

    The other vehicle was driven by Cecily Brown. … See, e.g., Seawright v. U.S.F.&G.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Morrow

    124 Ark. 480 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1916

    Subsequently, Morrow told Brown that he was going to sue Halford and have a writ of garnishment issued against Brown. … Millsaps v. Nixon, 102 Ark. 435 . In the application of this rule, in Robinson & Son Contracting Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Coddington v. Brown

    123 Ark. 486 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 24, 1916

    Hall v. Bonville, 36 Ark. 494 : McDonald v. Smith, 24 Ark. 614 ; Gunnells v. Latta, 86 Ark. 304 . In Simpson & Webb Furniture Co. v. Moore, 94. … “'The courts have’long held,” as said 'in Snodgrass v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Meekins

    278 Ark. 67 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1982

    The Browns, who live in California, where Kenneth’s mother lived and died, were not given notice of the adoption proceedings. … In Quarles v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hutchings

    14 Ark. 83 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1853

    On the 24th March, 1851, Brown sued Hutchings before a justice of the peace, on a note for $31 15, payable the llth day of April, 1845, with interest at the rate of 10 per centum per'annum, from the 8th of September, 1841 … Hutchings appealed to the Circuit Court of Pulaski county, and upon aerial de novo judgment was rendered for Hutchings, and Brown appealed to this court, having taken a bill of exceptions to the ruling of the Circuit Court

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kirkland

    156 Ark. 542 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 22, 1923

    Drainage District No. 7 of Craighead County v. Stuart, 104 Ark. 113 , and Drainage District No. 1 v. Rolfe, 110 Ark. 374 . … In recognition of this principle, see Hempstead County v. Howard County 51 Ark. 344 , and Thomas v. Thomas, 150 Ark. 43 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Purdy v. Brown

    4 Ark. 535 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1842

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lockhart

    288 Ark. 483 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1986

    Appellant, Johnny Charles Brown, is an inmate in the Department of Correction. … In Bosnick, supra, we quoted from the United States Supreme Court case of Weaver v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Norred

    122 Ark. 100 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1916

    let the ditch contract for him and that Brown asked him what price he was to receive, that he told Brown and the latter then replied that that was all right, to go ahead and do the work and he would see that he got his money … Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Bogan, 78 Ark. 173 , Bogan entered into a contract to clear a part of the right-of-way at a stipulted price.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    161 Ark. 253 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 26, 1923

    Co. v. Soloman, 123 Ark. 66 ; Lisco v. Uhren, 130 Ark. 111 . … Austin v. State, 14 Ark. 555 ; 10 R. C. L. p. 925.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Windland

    249 Ark. 6 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 21, 1970

    Sweet v. Irrigation Canal Co., 198 Ore. 166 , 256 P. 2d 252 (1953); Buck v. Squiers, 22 Vt. 484 (1850); see also Moody v. Palmer, 50 Cal. 31 (1875); People v. Astle, 337 Ill. 253 , 169 N. E. 185 (1929). … Doe v. Porter, 3 Ark. 18, 56 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    347 Ark. 362 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 2002

    Appellant Joshua Brown, by and through his attorney, Charles Duell, has filed a motion to file a belated brief and for an extension of time. … See Johnson v. State, 337 Ark. 609 , 990 S.W.2d 553 (1999) (per curiam); Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561 , 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    134 Ark. 597 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 1918

    Allen v. State, 70 Ark. 337 . … This question was thoroughly discussed in the case of Tillman v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hamiter v. Brown

    88 Ark. 97 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 16, 1908

    Tabor v. Merchants’ National Bank, 48 Ark. 454 . … Evans v. Speer Hardware Co., 65 Ark. 204 . The instructions given by the - court at the instance of appellant were more favorable to him than he was entitled 'to, but of this he cannot complain.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    333 Ark. 698 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 25, 1998

    See Hicks v. State, 324 Ark. 450 , 921 S.W.2d 604 (1996) (per curiam); Webster v. State, 320 Ark. 393 , 896 S.W.2d 890 (1995) (per curiam). Because the motions are void, we treat them as if they had never been made. … See, e.g., Noel v. State, 331 Ark. 79 , 960 S.W.2d 439 (1998); Green v. State, 330 Ark. 458 , 956 S.W.2d 849 (1997). Affirmed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.