Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

1.14s

  • Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.

    378 S.W.3d 109 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 2011

    BROWN, Justice, dissenting. The majority holds today that pharmacists owe no duty to their customers to warn them of fatal prescriptions. … V. Arkansas Standard of Care— Board Regulations The Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy has adopted a comprehensive regulation on patient care and patient counseling for pharmacists.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Meadow Lake Farms, Inc. v. Cooper

    360 Ark. 164 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 16, 2004

    Brown, Justice. … See Cooper Realty Investments, Inc. v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board, supra; Ports Petroleum Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Tucker, 323 Ark. 680 , 916 S.W.2d 749 (1996).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hunt v. Hunt

    341 Ark. 173 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 27, 2000

    Initially, the court of appeals affirmed the chancery court across the board in an unpublished opinion. Hunt v. Hunt, CA 98-766 (March 3, 1999). … Louis and Seligman, Fundamentals of Securities Regulation, p. 707 (Little Brown & Co. 1995).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Cole v. State

    323 Ark. 8 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 8, 1996

    All of the men who had been in the group, including Germaine Brown, then ran away. The defendant bears the burden of proving that a witness is an accomplice whose testimony must be corroborated. Nelson v. … Code Ann. § 5-2-403 (1987); Pilcher v. State, 303 Ark. 335 , 796 S.W.2d 845 (1990). Mere presence at the scene of the crime does not make one an accomplice. Spears v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McGregor & Pickett v. Arrington

    206 Ark. 921 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1943

    Other recent cases on the subject are: Birchett v. Tuf-Nut Garment Mfg. Co., 205 Ark. 483 , 169 S. W. 2d 574 ; J. L. Williams & Sons, Inc., v. Smith, 205 Ark. 604 , 170 S. W. 2d 82 ; Gwin v. … In the conclusions of law filed by the Commission, it is said that: “An excellent review of English and American heart attack cases is given in Guay v. Brown Co., 83 N. H. 392, 142 Atl. 697 , 60 A. L.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Bear Chaney, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Arkansas Assessment Coordination Division of the State of Arkansas v. Union Producing, LLCessment

    611 S.W.3d 482 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 3, 2020

    Then, in January 2018, this court handed down its decision in Board of Trustees of University of Arkansas v. Andrews, 2018 Ark. 12, 535 S.W.3d 616. … See John v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Housley v. State

    143 Ark. 315 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1920

    And again, in the ease of Butt v. … Chapline v. State, 77 Ark. 444 ; Parker v. State, 98 Ark. 575 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. Lemna

    2014 Ark. 377 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 18, 2014

    Brown, 326 Ark. 691, 932 S.W.2d 769. We have a long line of cases that have reviewed co-employee immunity. In King v. … Brown, 326 Ark. at 698, 932 S.W.2d at 774. Brown is directly on point for purposes of Miller and Bratt’s appeal.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Junction City School District v. Alphin

    313 Ark. 456 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 14, 1993

    Brown, Justice. The appellees are teachers with the appellant Junction City School District in Union County. … Barr v. Cockrill, supra; see also Atkins Pickle v. Burrough-Uerling-Brasuell, supra.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Torry Rodgers v. Arkansas Parole Board; John Felts, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas Parole Board; Arkansas Department of Correction, Division of Correction; and Dexter Payne, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Arkansas Division of Correction

    2024 Ark. 176 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 12, 2024

    Arkansas Parole Board became the Arkansas Post-Prison Transfer Board. … Clayton Cnty., 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is more appropriate, as discussed more fully in my dissent in the companion case, Wright v. Arkansas Post-Prison Transfer Board, et al.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hough v. Maupin

    73 Ark. 518 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 14, 1905

    Clark v. Taylor, 69 Ark. 612 ; Crebbin v. Deloney, 70 Ark, 493; Farmers' Saving & Building & Loan Association v. Ferguson, 69 Ark. 352 ; Bank of Harrison. v. Gibson. 60 Ark. 269 ; Sawyer v. Dickson, 66 Ark. 77 . … When a building and loan association is insolvent, the rule to ascertain the amount due is declared in Hale v. Phillips, 68 Ark. 382 . The Missouri courts adopt the same rule. Brown v. Archer, 62 Mo.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vaughan v. Screeton

    181 Ark. 511 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1930

    Co. v. McConnell, 74 Ark. 54 , 84 S. W. 1043 ; Westmoreland v. Plant, 89 Ark. 147 , 116 S. W. 188 ; and Thompson v. Grace, 91 Ark. 52 , 120 S. … In Paris Mercantile Company v. Hunter, 74 Ark. 615 , 86 S. W. 808 , it was held that the objection for want of necessary parties can not be raised on appeal if not raised in the trial court. In Peeples v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Romes v. State

    356 Ark. 26 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 2004

    The gunman then told Brown to tell his friend to come out of the bathroom, or he would shoot Brown. Brown did as he was told. … Brown also described Appellant as wearing a burgundy windbreaker, a black V-neck sweater, beige pants, and a red toboggan-style cap.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Westark Specialties, Inc. v. Lindsey

    259 Ark. 351 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 23, 1976

    There was testimony that Brown was warned on a previous occasion by the foreman about having a gun on the premises. In Townsend Paneling v. … In the case at bar, had Yutterman suffered an injury from the hands of his co-employee Brown, then Yutterman would be entitled to compensation. Townsend Paneling v. Butler, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Earnest

    307 Ark. 294 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1991

    Brown, Justice. The sole issue in this appeal is whether a divorce or separation from bed and board constituted a final decree of divorce under Ark. … See Myers v. Williams, 225 Ark. 290 , 281 S.W.2d 944 (1955).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patrick v. State

    295 Ark. 473 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 16, 1988

    He carried a small hatchet in a scabbard at his waist; he had a .22 rifle in his car, which was a brown Chrysler New Yorker. … In order for test results to be admissible under this statute, the test instrument must be certified by the Arkansas State Board of Health. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-65-206 (c) and (d) (1987). See Wells v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hogrobrooks v. Routon

    321 Ark. 654 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 2, 1995

    See State v. Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners, 300 Ark. 405 , 779 S.W.2d 169 (1989) (a Writ of Mandamus is directed to a ministerial officer). … Brown and Roaf, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shearer v. Morgan

    240 Ark. 616 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 4, 1966

    Smith v. McEachin, 186 Ark. 1132 , 57 S. W. 2d 1043 (1933). Barrentine v. Henry Wrape Co., 120 Ark. 206 , 179 S. W. 328 (1915). … See AMI. 2111 (1965). • See also Hill v. Wilson, 216 Ark. 179 , 224 S. W. 2d 797 (1949).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.