Case law

El-Farra v. Sayyed

365 Ark. 209 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 2, 2006

On May 30, 2003, the Executive Committee sent another letter to appellant, and copied the Board members. … Brown, 295 Ark. 371 , 749 S.W.2d 297 (1988) (we stated that we do not interfere in purely ecclesiastical matters).

Collins v. State

571 S.W.3d 469 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 2019

While Jackson denied seeing Collins shoot Brown, Bailey was an eyewitness to the crime. Bailey testified that he witnessed Collins shoot Brown three times, leave the home, and then return to shoot Brown a fourth time. … In Winfrey v.

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality v. Al-Madhoun

374 Ark. 28 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 2008

P. 8(a)(1); Grine v. Bd. of Trustees, 338 Ark. 791 , 2 S.W.3d 54 (1999); Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997). … Regulation 8. • After Mary Leath’s threat, Marcus Devine filed a Board Complaint against Mr.

McLane Co. v. Davis

342 Ark. 655 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 16, 2000

Credit Ass’n, 310 Ark. 597 , 839 S.W.2d 187 (1992) (citing NAACP v. New York, 413 U.S. 345 (1973)). Timeliness is to be determined from all the circumstances, Carton v. … Board that the Chicot County lawsuit became relevant to McLane.

Pitts v. Hobbs

2013 Ark. 457 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 7, 2013

Brown v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 483, 707 S.W.2d 304 (1986). … See Strong v.

Mitcham v. Ark-La. Construction Co.

239 Ark. 1162 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1965

Brown, Compton & Prewett, by William I. Prewett, El Dorado, for appellee. BERNARD WHETSTONE, Special Associate Justice. This proceeding originated in this court as a Petition for Writ of Prohibition. … V), there must be a proper determination of whether the case is actually one of those which the Board will decline to hear. Hatties-Imrg Building [and] Trades Council v.

Wacaster v. State

172 Ark. 983 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1927

In Wawak and Vaught v. … Hinson v. State, 133 Ark. 149 ; Pearson v. State, 119 Ark. 152 ."

School Dist. No. 38 v. Bd. of Educ. of Clay Cty.

180 Ark. 378 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1929

Jones v. Oldham, 109 Ark. 24 , 158 S. W. 1075 . … Again, in State v. Adams, 142 Ark. 411 , 218 S.

Rural Special School District No. 17 v. Special School District No. 56

123 Ark. 570 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 8, 1916

We held in Bonner v. … Hale v. Brown, 70 Ark. 471 ; Stephens v. School District, 104 Ark. 145 ; Carpenter v. Leather-man, 117 Ark. 531 , 176 S. W. 113 ; School District, No. 45 v. School District No. 8, 119 Ark. 149 .

Ayliff v. Hardy's Executors

25 Ark. 49 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1867

We think that the damages are excessive, and that the verdict, as a whole, is without proof to support it; and recognizing the rule, as laid down by this court in Wallace v. … Brown, 17 Ark., 449, and preceding cases, we hold that the circuit court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Gammill v. Johnson

47 Ark. 335 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1886

Yeates v. Pryor, 11 Ark., 66. … Eq., sec. 895; Mead v. Bunn, 32 N. Y., 275 ; David v. Park, 103 Mass., 501 ; Kiefer v. Rogers, 19 Minn., 32 ; Matlock v. Todd, 19 Ind., 130 ; Keller v. Equitable Fire Ins. Co., 28 Ib., 170; Reynell v.

Fitzgiven v. Dorey

429 S.W.3d 234 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 26, 2013

PACT alleged that following the State Board’s determination that the PCSSD was in fiscal distress, ADE dissolved the PCSSD’s board of education, removed its superintendent, and placed ADE’s Commissioner, Dr. … See Grine v. Board of Trustees, 338 Ark. 791, 2 S.W.3d 54 (1999).

Campbell v. Jones

52 Ark. 493 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1889

Driggs & Co.’s Bank v. Norwood, 50 Ark., 42; Adams v. Edgerton, 48 Ark., 419; Hershy v. Latham, 46 Ark., 542; Reeves v. Sherwood, 45 Ark., 520; Danley v. Rector, 10 Ark., 225; Leach v. Fowler, 22 Ark., 145; Bertrand v. … Brown for the 1600 acres of land in Arkansas, is, we apprehend, well settled. Byrd et al. v. Jones et al., 37 Ark., 194; Talifero Ex., v. Rawlton, 34 Ark., 503; Neal v. Seigel, 33 Ark., 63; Strann v.

Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.

378 S.W.3d 109 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 2011

BROWN, Justice, dissenting. The majority holds today that pharmacists owe no duty to their customers to warn them of fatal prescriptions. … V. Arkansas Standard of Care— Board Regulations The Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy has adopted a comprehensive regulation on patient care and patient counseling for pharmacists.

Harper v. Mo. Pac. Rd. Co.

229 Ark. 348 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 1, 1958

The appellant does not claim that there was any failure by the defendants to comply with the warning board statute (§ 73-717 Ark. Stats.), or the lookout statute (§ 73-1002 Ark. … Some of these are: Tinsley v. Mo. Pac., 189 Ark. 530 , 73 S. W. 2d 473 ; Garner v. Mo. Pac., 210 Ark. 214 , 195 S. W. 2d 39 ; and Walker v. Mo. Pac., 211 Ark. 635 , 201 S. W. 2d 768 .

Georgia Caslty. v. Bd. Dir. St. Francis Levee

188 Ark. 1122 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1934

V. Cartwright, Ike Miller, and O. W. … Williams was president of the board of directors of St. Francis Levee District, appellee herein, and president of the Bank of Osceola. B.

Chandler v. Martin

433 S.W.3d 884 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 2014

Brown v. State, 375 Ark. 499 , 292 S.W.3d 288 (2009). However, this court will not give statutes a literal interpretation if it leads to absurd consequences that are contrary to legislative intent. Brock, supra. … Brown v. Kelton, 2011 Ark. 93, at 8 , 380 S.W.3d 361 , 366.

Meadow Lake Farms, Inc. v. Cooper

360 Ark. 164 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 16, 2004

Brown, Justice. … See Cooper Realty Investments, Inc. v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board, supra; Ports Petroleum Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Tucker, 323 Ark. 680 , 916 S.W.2d 749 (1996).

Cole v. State

323 Ark. 8 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 8, 1996

All of the men who had been in the group, including Germaine Brown, then ran away. The defendant bears the burden of proving that a witness is an accomplice whose testimony must be corroborated. Nelson v. … Code Ann. § 5-2-403 (1987); Pilcher v. State, 303 Ark. 335 , 796 S.W.2d 845 (1990). Mere presence at the scene of the crime does not make one an accomplice. Spears v.

Westark Specialties, Inc. v. Lindsey

259 Ark. 351 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 23, 1976

There was testimony that Brown was warned on a previous occasion by the foreman about having a gun on the premises. In Townsend Paneling v. … In the case at bar, had Yutterman suffered an injury from the hands of his co-employee Brown, then Yutterman would be entitled to compensation. Townsend Paneling v. Butler, supra.