Case law

Kinsey v. State

503 S.W.3d 772 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 17, 2016

See also Brown v. … Brown v. State, 2010 Ark. 420 , 378 S.W.3d 66 .” Huff v. State, 2012 Ark. 388, at 7 , 423 S.W.3d 608, 612 .

Schirmer v. Cockrill

223 Ark. 817 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 14, 1954

The legal residence of the Eclectic State Medical Board is Pulaski County, Arkansas. BaKer v. Fraser, 209 Ark. 932 , 193 S. W. 2d 131 ; Leonard v. Henry, 187 Ark. 75 , 58 S. W. 2d 430 ; Downey v. … W. 1041 ; Green v. Blanchard, 138 Ark. 137 , 211 S. W. 375 , 5 A. L. R. 84; Eclectic State Board v. Beatty, 203 Ark. 294 , 156 S. W. 2d 246 .

Baker v. Lockhart

288 Ark. 91 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1986

The trial court concluded that a writ of habeas corpus was not the proper remedy to challenge the parole board’s action and dismissed the petition. Appellant filed a notice of appeal and lodged the record. … Bargo v. State, 279 Ark. 180 , 650 S.W.2d 227 (1983); Mitchell v. State, 233 Ark. 578 , 346 S.W.2d 201 (1961).

Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Davis

278 Ark. 387 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 21, 1983

White, Horseshoe Bend and Lambert & Brown, Cherokee Village, for appellees. DUDLEY, Justice. … Elcare, Inc. v. Gocio, 267 Ark. 605 , 593 S.W.2d 159 (1980).

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DeLaughter

250 Ark. 990 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 21, 1971

State Highway Comm’n v. Fox, 230 Ark. 287 , 322 S. W. 2d 81 ; Ark. State Highway Comm’n v. Maus, 245 Ark. 357 , 432 S. W. 2d 478 . … Scott v. State, 230 Ark. 766 , 326 S. W. 2d 812 ; Desha v. Independence County Bridge District No. 1, 176 Ark. 253 , 3 S. W. 2d 969 ; Rinke v. Union Special School District No. 19, 174 Ark. 59 , 294 S.

Abraham v. Beck

456 S.W.3d 744 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 26, 2015

See, e.g., Seymour v. … In Johnson v.

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. Holwerk

204 Ark. 587 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 22, 1942

M., etc., v. White, 48 Ark. 495 , 4 S. W. 52 ; Richardson v. Cohen, 113 Ark. 598 , 167 S. W. 83 ; American Surety Co. v. Kinnear Mfq. Co., 185 Ark. 593 , 30 S. W. 2d 825 ; So. Lbr. Co. v. Green, 186 Ark. 209 , 53 S. … Co. v. Moss, 186 Ark. 30 , 52 S. W. 2d 49 ; American Co. v. Baker, 187 Ark. 492 , 60 S. W. 2d 572 . See, also, Brown v. Duggan, 189 Ark. 551 , 74 S. W. 2d 640 .

Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. City of Little Rock

256 Ark. 112 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 4, 1974

LYLE Brown, Justice. The appellant Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company (Arkla) is a privately owned gas distribution utility; its franchise covers the city of Little Rock. … Ciulla v. State, 77 NYS 2d 545 , 191 Misc. 528 (1948). Then there is the case of Tumulty v.

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

504 S.W.3d 573 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 17, 2016

Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 65 , 128 S.Ct. 2408 , 171 L.Ed.2d 264 (2008) (citations omitted). |7In Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. … Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959). The Court wrote: The Court [in Farmer v.

Conrad Reynolds And Arkansas Voter Integrity Initiative, Inc., Individually and on Behalf of Restore Election Integrity Arkansas, a Ballot Question Committee v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State And the State Board of Election Commissioners, an Original Action

689 S.W.3d 48 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 2024

Armstrong v. … This case is distinguishable from Armstrong v.

McCrory School District v. Brogden

231 Ark. 664 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 29, 1960

See Jackson v. Gregory, 208 Ark. 768 , 187 S. W. 2d 547 . Nonetheless, we do not agree with appellants’ contention. … A rather interesting discussion of the law relating to “Perpetuities” and “Determinable fees” is found in Brown v. Independent Baptist Church of Woburn, et al, 325 Mass. 645 , 91 N. E. 2d 922 .

Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 16

169 Ark. 690 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 19, 1925

Camden v. Arkansas Light & Power Co., 145 Ark. 205 . … It was said in the case of Davis, State Bank Commr., v.

Elm Springs State Bank v. Bradley

179 Ark. 437 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1929

Witness declined to make the loan until the board of directors of the bank had approved it, and, when the board met, Bradley put in an application for a loan to Mrs. … Central Clay Drainage Dist. v. Hunter, 174 Ark. 293 , 295 S. W. 19 ; McCollum v. Neimeyer, 142 Ark. 471 , 219 S. W. 746 ; Flanagan v. Ray, 149 Ark. 411 , 232 S. W. 600 ; Brown v. Ark.

Crain v. Bd. of Dir. St. Francis Levee Dist. (1)

190 Ark. 305 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 11, 1935

Francis Levee District v. … Fulcher v. Dierks Lbr. & Coal Co., 164 Ark. 261 , 261 S. W. 645 ; Oliver v. Oliver, 182 Ark. 1025 , 34 S. W. (2d) 226 ; City National Bank v. Riggs, 188 Ark. 420 , 66 S. W. (2d) 293 .

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Mullens

255 Ark. 796 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 24, 1973

Lyle Brown, Justice. This eminent domain case concerns a 104 acre tract with a quarter mile frontage on State Highway 23. … Arkansas State Highway Comm. v. Russell, 240 Ark. 21 , 398 S.W. 2d 201 (1966).

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Spence

254 Ark. 423 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 7, 1973

In Arkansas State Highway Commission v. … Brown, J., not participating.

Jones v. Sewer Improvement District No. 3

119 Ark. 166 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 7, 1915

(For cases in point with reference to municipal corporations and their officers, see the following: Browne v. Bentonville, 94 Ark. 80 ; Franks v. Holly Grove, 93 Ark. 250 ; Gregg v. Hatcher, 94 Ark. 54 ; Gray v. … For oases in point as to improvement districts and their officers, see: Board of Improvement of Sewer District No. 2 v. Moreland, 94 Ark. 380 ; Wood v. Drainage District No. 2 of Conway County, 110 Ark. 416 .

County Bd. Elect. Comm. of Lonoke Cty. v. Waggoner

190 Ark. 341 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 11, 1935

Petitioners cite and rely on Willeford v. State ex rel., 43 Ark. 62 . … After the adoption of the road tax amendment, the case of Adkins v. Harrington, 164 Ark. 280 , 261 S. W. 626 , was decided.

Skinner v. R.J. Griffin & Co.

313 Ark. 430 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 14, 1993

In Cates v. Brown, 278 Ark. 242, 247 , 645 S.W.2d 658, 661 (1983), we said that "conjecture and *916 speculation cannot be permitted to replace proof." … The jury could have found that he was careless in walking too close to the edge, even if the protective board referred to by McKinney had somehow been removed. On this point the case is similar to Headrick v. H.D.

Browne & Billings v. Rouse & Hely Construction Co.

159 Ark. 677 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1923

ft.) foot concrete pavement with four (4 ft.) foot gravel shoulders on either side is to be constructed from the termination of the twenty-six (26 ft.) foot pavement, and that it is contemplated by the engineer and the board … The proceeds that should arise from the contract were assigned to Browne & Billings, a partnership composed of E. J. Browne and R. J.