Case law

Bradley v. Jones

227 Ark. 574 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 25, 1957

In Kirk v. Roach, 226 Ark. 799 , 294 S. … Wilson v. Luck, 201 Ark. 594 , 146 S. W. 2d 696 ; Mercer v. Motor Wheel Corp., 178 Ark. 383 , 10 S. W. 2d 852 ; Auto Sales Co., Inc. v. Mays, 191 Ark. 884 , 88 S. W. 2d 330 .

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Commissioners Sewer Improvement District No. 1

137 Ark. 375 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 17, 1919

Boston Store v. Schleuter, 88 Ark. 213 -224; Hot Springs Ry. Co. v. Maher, 48 Ark. 522 ; Ozan Lumber Co. v. Haynes, 68 Ark. 185 ; Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. Wilson, 91 Ark. 30 ; Lanier v. … Construing the portion of the section quoted in the case of Board, of Improvement Commissioners v. Galbraith, 133 Ark. 302 , 185 S.

Higginbotham v. Junction City School District

332 Ark. 556 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 16, 1998

This court addressed the standard of review for school board decisions in Hamilton v. Pulaski County Special Sch. … See, e.g., Ragar v. Brown, 332 Ark. 214 , 964 S.W.2d 372 (1998). We will therefore defer any departures from the plain language of the Act to that legislative body. Small v.

State v. Pulaski County Circuit Court Steven Marshall

316 Ark. 514 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 28, 1994

See State v. Murphy, 315 Ark. 68 , 864 S.W.2d 842 (1993). … Thomerson v. State, 274 Ark. 17 , 621 S.W.2d 690 (1981).

Simpson v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC

440 S.W.3d 335 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2014

Brown v. State, 375 Ark. 499, 292 S.W.3d 288 (2009). However, this court will not give statutes a literal interpretation if it leads to absurd consequences that are contrary to legislative intent. Brock v. … In Finch v.

Miles v. Gordon

234 Ark. 525 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1962

In Brown v. The Arkansas Centennial Commission, 194 Ark. 479 , 107 S. W. 2d 537 , the same contention was made in an attack upon Act 180 of 1935. … Therefore, these bonds, which the State Board of Education is about to issue, are not within the prohibited class.” In McArthur v.

Mohawk Rubber Co. v. Buford

259 Ark. 614 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 1976

See Zeeb v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 62 Cal. Rptr. 753 , 432 P. 2d 361 (1967). … See Zeeb v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, supra; cf. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 220 Cal. App. 2d 327 , 33 Cal. Rptr. 649 (1963) and Montyk v.

Armstrong v. Sturch

235 Ark. 571 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 22, 1962

In January, 1944, in the case of Yarbrough v. Beardon and Phillips v. Foreman, 206 Ark. 553 , 177 S. … Thereafter, on October 29, 1956, this court handed down its decision in Brown v. Davis, 226 Ark. 843 , 294 S. W. 2d 481 , which we deem controlling in the present litigation.

Harris v. City of Little Rock

344 Ark. 95 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 2001

See Craft v. City of Fort Smith, 335 Ark. 417 , 984 S.W.2d 22 (1998); Laudan v. State, 322 Ark. 58 , 907 S.W.2d 131 (1995); Board of Adjustment of Fayetteville v. … BROWN and Imber, JJ., concur. Norman Mark Klappenbach, Spl. J., concurs. Thornton, J., not participating.

Jacobs v. Yates

342 Ark. 243 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 5, 2000

Obviously, the Phillips County Board of Election Commissioners was a necessary party so that complete relief could be afforded in this action which was brought seeking compliance with § 7-5-207. See State v. … Brown and Smith, JJ., dissenting.

Progressive Life Insurance v. Hulbert

196 Ark. 352 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 6, 1938

Browning, and the doctor told her the insured “Is pretty sick in his stomach, ulcers of.the stomach or whatever you call it.” … Browning had said was. incompetent as hearsay. There was testimony also to the effect that Dr. Gould — and not Dr. Browning —was the family physician.

In Re Crossley

310 Ark. 435 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 21, 1992

Brown, Justice. … Frasher v. West Virginia Board of Law Examiners, 408 S.E.2d 675, 682 (W. Va. 1991).

BD. OF EXAMINERS IN COUNSELING v. Carlson

334 Ark. 614 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 29, 1998

See, e.g., Hamilton v. A.P.C. & E. Comm’n, 333 Ark. 370 , 969 S.W.2d 653 (1998); Social Work Licensing Bd. v. Moncebaiz, 332 Ark. 67 , 962 S.W.2d 797 (1998); Wright v. … Franklin v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 319 Ark. 468 , 892 S.W.2d 262 (1995) (citing Riverways Home Care v. Arkansas Health Servs. Comm’n, 309 Ark. 452 , 831 S.W.2d 611 (1992); Arkansas Cemetery Bd. v.

Hiter v. Harahan Viaduct Improvement District

165 Ark. 351 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 14, 1924

McClelland v. Pittman, 139 Ark. 341 ; Southern Crawford Road Imp. Dist. v. Brown, 156 Ark. 267 ; Wagner v. Lesser, 239 U. S. 207 ; Valley Farms Co. v. Westchester, 261 U S. 155. … Dist. v. Brown, supra.

Tumey v. Daniels

359 Ark. 256 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 2004

Tumey also sought a writ of mandamus directing Appellees, Arkansas Secretary of State Charlie Daniels, the State Board of Election Commissioners, and the Benton County Board of Election Commissioners, 1 to remove Hutchinson … This court held as much in Storey v.

Henderson v. Anderson

251 Ark. 724 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1972

Jones v. Etheridge, 242 Ark. 907 , 416 S. W. 2d 306 (1967). … Henley v. Goggins, 250 Ark. 912 , 467 S. W. 2d 697 (1971). Affirmed.

DeSoto Gathering Co. v. Hill ‎(16-990)‎

531 S.W.3d 396 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 30, 2017

Comm. on Grievances of Colorado Bar Ass’n v. Denver Clearing House Banks, 99 Colo. 50 , 59 P.2d 468, 470 (1936)).” Brown v. Kelton, 2011 Ark. 93, at 6-7 , 380 S.W.3d 361 , 365-66. … Undem v. State Board of Law Examiners, 266 Ark. 683 , 587 S.W.2d 563 (1979).” Clarendon Am. Ins. Co. v. Hickok, 370 Ark. 41, 46 , 257 S.W.3d 43, 46-47 (2007).

Pulaski Cty. v. Bd. of Ark. Tuberculosis Sanatorium

186 Ark. 61 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 27, 1932

W. (2d) 770 ; McGregor v. Miller, 173 Ark. 459 , 293 S. W. 30 ; Dixie Culvert Mfg. Co. v. Perry County, 174 Ark. 107 , 294 S. W. 381 ; Lybrand v. Wafford, 174 Ark. 298 , 296 S. W. 729 ; Polk County v. … W. 1002 ; Lake v. Tatum, 175 Ark. 90 , 1 S. W. (2d) 554; Miller v. State use Woodruff County, 176 Ark. 889 , 1 S. W. (2d) 998 ; Chestnutt v. Gates, 177 Ark. 894 , 9 S. W. (2d) 37 ; Carter v. Cain, 179 Ark. 79 , 14 S.

Bowman v. Browning

17 Ark. 599 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1856

Erancis river, at the burnt mill landing, two bales of cotton, marked, and of the weight as is specified in the bill of particulars, and that they, together with a large number of other bales of cotton, had been taken on board … testified, “that he, (the witness) some time previous to the taking of the cotton in controversy, as alleged, instructed Captain Bowman, the defendant, that there would be some cotton sent to the burnt mills landing for Browning

Gray v. Mitchell

373 Ark. 560 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 29, 2008

Brown,Justice. … Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v.