Case law

Woodruff County v. Road Improvement District No. 14

159 Ark. 374 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 11, 1923

Monroe County v. Brown, 118 Ark. 524 , and Izard County v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 122 Ark. 557 . … deliver the warrants to said board.

Special School District of Fort Smith v. Lynch

242 Ark. 385 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 24, 1967

Lynch from recovery against the school board. In Williams Manufacturing Company v. Strasberg, 229 Ark. 321 , 314 S. W. 2d 500 , we said: “* # * One cannot ‘have his cake and eat it too.’ … BrowN and Foglemajst, JJ., concur. It is not definite, from the evidence, whether this was late May or early June. Mrs.

Ricky Hendrix, Individually and on Behalf of All Arkansans Similarly Situated v. Municipal Health Benefit Fund

655 S.W.3d 678 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 8, 2022

-Civ. 3(d) (2004); Boothe v. Boothe, 341 Ark. 381, 17 S.W.3d 464 (2000); Brown v. Minor, 305 Ark. 556, 810 S.W.2d 334 (1991). … of the Board finding that the statute establishing the Board violated the separation- of-powers doctrine.

Haynes v. Clark

196 Ark. 1127 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 7, 1938

Beardsley v. Hill, 77 Ark. 244 , 91 S. W. 757 ; Allen v. Phillips, 87 Ark. 185 , 112 S. W. 403 ; Winn v. Whitehouse, 96 Ark. 42 , 131 S. W. 70 ; Wallace v. Hill, 135 Ark. 353 , 205 S. W. 699 ; Robert v. … Brown, 157 Ark. 230 , 247 S. W. 1058 ; France v. Butcher, 165 Ark. 312 , 264 S. W. 931 ; Robinson v. Cravens, 176 Ark. 682 , 4 S. W. 2d 533 . In the case of Winn v.

Simes v. Crumbly

368 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 6, 2006

Election Contests In Casey v. … See Willis v. Crumbly, 368 Ark. 5 , 242 S.W.3d 600 (2006). A discussion in Morrow v.

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Howard

367 Ark. 55 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 2006

In Rose v. … Brown, J., concurs. Glaze, J., not participating. Subject-matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time. See Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Isbell, 360 Ark. 256 , 200 S.W.3d 873 (2005).

Board of Commissioners of Buffo Drainage District No. 7 v. Arkansas County

179 Ark. 91 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1929

Digest, and also under the decision of this court in Rolfe v. Spybuck Drainage District No. 1, 101 Ark. 29 , 140 S. W. 988 . … We do not consider that the case of Rolfe v. Spybuck Drainage District, supra, is authority for appellants’ contention.

Hannon v. Armorel School District 9

329 Ark. 267 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1997

Brown, Justice. … We recently had a similar situation in Honeycutt v.

UNIVERSITY OF ARK. FOR MED. SCIEN. v. Adams

117 S.W.3d 588 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2003

Arkansas Tech Univ. v. Link, 341 Ark. 495 , 17 S.W.3d 809 (2000). Where the pleadings show the action is one against the State, the trial court acquires no jurisdiction. Id.; Brown v. Ark. St. HVACR Lic. … This court has consistently held that a suit against a state university or its board of trustees is a suit against the State and is barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. See Chambers v.

Quapaw Quarter Ass'n Inc. v. City of Little Rock Board of Zoning Adjustment

261 Ark. 74 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1977

party — i.e. we must sustain the findings of the circuit court if they are supported by any substantial evidence, Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. … In Meyer v. Seifert, 216 Ark. 293 , 225 S.W. 2d 4 (1949), we pointed out that an ordinance of a city cannot be repealed, amended or suspended by resolution.

H.T. Hackney Co. v. Davis

353 Ark. 797 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 26, 2003

Brown, Justice. This is an appeal from an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court affirming a decision of the Arkansas Tobacco Control Board (Board), fining the appellant, H.T. Hackney Co. … Dep’t v. Kidder, 326 Ark. 595 , 933 S.W.2d 794 (1996); Wacaser v. Insurance Comm’r, 321 Ark. 143 , 900 S.W.2d 191 (1995).

Four County (NW) Regional Solid Waste Management District Board v. Sunray Services, Inc.

334 Ark. 118 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1998

Brown, Justice. … We said in Ferguson v.

Swiderski v. Goggins

257 Ark. 164 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 1974

Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellant is the county clerk of Searcy County. Appellees constitute the board of election commissioners of Searcy County. John A. … In Naylor v.

Bakalekos v. Furlow

385 S.W.3d 810 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 1, 2011

The circuit court did not err in granting summary judgment to the Board on this basis. V. … Brown v. Kelton, 2011 Ark. 93 , 380 S.W.3d 361 (citing McCoy v. Walker, 317 Ark. 86, 89 , 876 S.W.2d 252, 254 (1994)).

State ex rel. Sargent v. Lewis

335 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1998

. § 7-5-211 (a) (Repl. 1993) provided that the county board of election commissioners was to deliver ballots and other election supplies to the sheriff. … Brown, J., concurs. Glaze, J., dissents.

Garrett v. Faubus

230 Ark. 445 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 27, 1959

Essentially the same principle was announced by this court in Board of Trustees, University of Ark. v. Pulaski County, 229 Ark. 370 , 315 S. … The Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Brown, et al v. Board of Education of Topela, et al., 347 U. S. 483 , 98 L. Ed. 873 , 74 S.

Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District

100 Ark. 94 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 5, 1911

Niles v. Cedar Point Club, 175 U. S. 300 ; see also Kean v. Calumet Canal & Improvement Co., 190 U. S. 452 . … Porter, 3 Ark. 60 ; Newson v. Pryor, 7 Wheat. 7 ; Towell v. Etter, 69 Ark. 34 .

Coburn v. Arkansas State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

278 Ark. 514 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 7, 1983

The appellant argues that this conduct constituted a violation of the Arkansas Criminal Code; and since the power to convict for crimes is not within the authority of the ABC Board, the Board may not suspend a permit for … For authority she cites State v. Lawrence, 246 Ark. 644 , 439 S.W.2d 819 (1969).

Johnson v. Hamlen

148 Ark. 634 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 23, 1921

It was contended in the case of Bottrell v. Hollipeter, supra, that the opinion of this court in the case of Board of Improvement v. … Doe v. Porter, 3 Ark. 18 ; Harrell v. Hill, 19 Ark. 102 ; Brown v. Hardin, 21 Ark. 324 ; Chapman & Dewey Lbr. Co. v. Levee Dist., 100 Ark. 94 ; Scott v. Dunkel Box & Lbr. Co., 106 Ark. 83 ; Paschal v.

IBM Credit Corp. v. Pulaski County

316 Ark. 580 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1994

Arkansas City School Dist., 311 Ark. 145 , 842 S.W.2d 32 (1992); Tuthill v. Arkansas County Equalization Board, 303 Ark. 387 , 797 S.W.2d 439 (1990). … See also Tuthill v. Arkansas County Equalization Board, supra. The county assessor, B.A.