Case law

Griffith v. Melbourn

245 Ark. 40 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 3, 1968

Lyle Brown, Justice. This suit was brought by Howard Griffith, plaintiff-appellant, against his employers, George Melbourn and Farm Service Cooperative, to recover severance pay. … See First National Bank v. Hasty, 183 Ark. 519 , 36 S.W. 2d 967 (1931). In Hirsch v.

Dixie Cab Company v. Black White Cab Company

214 Ark. 624 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 7, 1949

The applicable rule is stated in Laird v. Byrd, 177 Ark. 1114 , 9 S. … Culberson v. Lakella Iron Works, 170 Ark. 813 , 281 S. W. 373 .”

Davis v. Phipps

191 Ark. 298 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 23, 1935

State v. Board of Regents for Northeast Missouri State Teachers’ College, 305 Mo. 57 , 264 S. W. 699 . A definition of revenue is given in the case of Commonwealth v. Brown, 91 Va. 762 , 21 S. … Also in Welch v. Hotchkiss, 39 Conn. 140 , 12 Am. Rep. 383 , and United States v. Wright, 28 Fed. Cases, 789.

State v. Morgan

52 Ark. 150 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1889

Louis Smelting and Refining Co. v. Kemp, 14 Otto, 636 ; Wilson v. State, Ark., 198. 4. Same: Same. … Harris, 51 Ark., 294; Boseman v. Browning, 31 Ark., 364; Ellis v. Ellis, 4 So. Rep., 868 .

Bayercropsciences Lp v. Glen Hooks Michael Dougan Pratt Remmell Reed Storey Tim Fisher Victor Gray Bland Currie Gladys Whitney Frances Wilson Shackleford Adam Fisher Guy Fisher Paden Ball Gale Stewart Coy's Honey Farm, Inc. Arkansas State Plant Board, a Division of the Arkansas Department of Agriculture Arkansas State Plant Board Members in Their Offcial Capacites: Walter "Bruce" Alford Kyle Baltz Tommy Anderson Reynold Meyer Darrell Hess Marty Eaton Barry Walls Terry Fuller Mark Hopper Brad Koen Sam Stuckey Terry Stephenson Dr. Ken Korth Dr. Nathan Slaton Matthew Marsh Jason Parks Scott Milburn Dennie Stokes Mark Morgan Omp Farms, LLC Ozark Mountain Poultry, Inc. Freedom to Farm Foundation, Inc. Jason McGee Tim Gannon Leslie Brown Hollis Mankin Farmvoice Inc. Timothy Pirani Adam Henard And Jarred Hopper

638 S.W.3d 274 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 10, 2022

In Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC v. … In McLane Co. v.

Hamilton v. Pulaski County Special School District

321 Ark. 261 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 3, 1995

Brown, Justice. … It is also beyond dispute that reasons for nonrenewal must be provided before the School Board hearing — not at a later time. Western Grove School Dist. v. Terry, supra; Green Forest Public Schools v. Herrington, supra.

Huckaby v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

119 Ark. 179 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 7, 1915

Co. v. Stell, supra; Kansas City S. Ry. Co. v. Darvis, supra; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co v. Briggs, 87 Ark. 581 ; Choctaw, Okla. & Gulf Rd. Co. v. Hickey, 81 Ark. 579 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, 74 Ark. 607 ; Railway v. Taylor, 57 Ark. 136 ; Kirby’s Digest, § § 3106, 3107.

Arkansas Pharmacist's Ass'n v. Arkansas State & Public School Life & Health Insurance Board

352 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 13, 2003

See also, NME Hospitals, Inc. v. … APCS also referred to Alca Industries, Inc. v.

Delaplaine Consolidated School District No. 7 v. State Board of Education

196 Ark. 434 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 13, 1938

shall issue bonds, the issue shall be approved by the State Board of Education.” … Berry v. Sale, 184 Ark. 655 , 43 S. W. 2d 225 ; Casey v. Smith, 185 Ark. 149 , 46 S. W. 2d 38 ; Koser v. Oliver, 186 Ark. 567 , 54 S. W. 2d 411 ; Neal v. Gatz, 187 Ark. 785 , 62 S. W. 2d 945 .

In Re Reinstatement of Law License of Lee

305 Ark. 196 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1991

Rule XIII; Scales v. State Bd. of Law Examiners, 282 Ark. 578 , 669 S.W.2d 895 (1984). … In light of the foregoing factors, we cannot say that the Board’s findings and conclusions of law were clearly erroneous. The decision not to reinstate Lee is affirmed. Corbin and Brown, JJ., not participating.

Post v. Franklin County Board of Election Commissioners

375 Ark. 345 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 2009

Zolliecoffer v. Post, 371 Ark. 263 , 265 S.W.3d 114 (2007). While the first appeal was pending, however, and within the time allowed by statute, the Board certified the votes cast for Post. … See, e.g., Willis v.

Muldrow v. Douglass

316 Ark. 86 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1994

Board of Educ. of Franklin Co. v. Ozark School Dist. No. 14, 280 Ark. 15 , 655 S.W.2d 368 (1983). This case falls into that category, and we therefore affirm. Hays and Brown, JJ., dissent.

City of Little Rock v. Garner

235 Ark. 362 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 17, 1962

W. 2d 118 ; and City of Blytheville v. Lewis, 218 Ark. 83 , 234 S. W. 2d 374 . 3 This was all discussed in Herring v. Stannus, 169 Ark. 244 , 275 S. … North Little Rock v. Rose, 136 Ark. 298 ; Pierce Oil Corp. v. Hope, 127 Ark. 38 .

Board of Improvement of Auditorium Improvement District No. 46 v. Moore

171 Ark. 839 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1926

"When the effect of the decision of this court in the caüe of Lipscomb v. … In the Lipscomb case the court reviewed the prior decision, of this court in the case of Matthews v.

Board of Improvement Street Improvement District No. 349 v. Little Rock

174 Ark. 519 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 27, 1927

This act was -before this court for consideration in White v. Loughborough, 125 Ark. 57 , 188 S. W. 10 . … McCord v. Welch, 147 Ark. 363 , 227 S. W. 765 .

American Bonding Co. v. Board of Street Improvement District No. 82

187 Ark. 300 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 17, 1933

Ætna Casualty Co. v. State, supra; Consolidated Indemnity & Ins. Co. v. State use Craighead County, 184 Ark. 581 , 43 S. W. (2d) 240 . … Norton v. Md. Cas. Co., 182 Ark. 609 , 32 S. W. (2d) 172 ; Consolidated Indemnity & Ins. Co. v. State use Craighead County, 184 Ark. 581 , 43 S. W. (2d) 240 .

Ahmad v. Beck

480 S.W.3d 166 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 2016

Ahmad filed in the circuit court an administrative appeal of the Board’s order. See Ahmad v. State Medical Board, Pulaski Cty. Cir. Ct., No. 60CV-13-2691. … Servs. v.

Ruiz v. Felts

512 S.W.3d 626 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 2017

Pitts v. Hobbs, 2013 Ark. 457, at 4 (per curiam) (citing Brown v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 483, 707 S.W.2d 304 (1986)). … Id. at 209, 672 S.W.2d at 53; see also Kellar v.

Parsons v. State

341 Ark. 150 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 27, 2000

district is composed of more than one school district, ... the board may apportion a certain number of positions on the board for each school district according to the most recent census information, so long as all board … BROWN, J., joins this dissent.

Board of Commissioners of Street Improvement District No. 349 v. Little Rock

172 Ark. 544 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1927

The statute requires the appointment of three electors of the city or town, and says they shall constitute a board of assessment of the benefits. … Page & Jones , Taxation by Assessment, § 901; Cicero v. Andren, 224 Ill. 617 , 79 N. E. 962 ; Larsen v. Chicago, 192 Ill. 298 , 50 N. E. 179 ; Hinkle v. Mattoon, 170 Ill. 316 , 48 N. E. 908 .