Case law

Arkansas Employment Security Department v. Mellon

322 Ark. 715 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 11, 1995

Brown, Justice. … Whether the new hearing should be granted is for the board to determine on remand. However, due process considerations stated in Paulino v.

Smith v. Dandridge

98 Ark. 38 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1911

In the case of Prick v. … Pickett v. School District, supra; Brown v. School District, 55 Vt. 43 ; Sylvester v. Webb, 52 L. R. A. 518.

Tidwell v. Southern Engine & Boiler Works

87 Ark. 52 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 1908

Brown order for mill complete. Have not heard from him or yourselves since. Kindly advise if order has been received and how soon I may expect shipment.” “August 7th, 1906. “Yours of 3d received. … Nilson v. Jonesboro, 57 Ark. 169 ; Stillwell v. Paepcke-Leicht Lumber Co., 73 Ark. 432 . Judgment affirmed.

Williams v. Board of Directors of Carden's Bottom Levee District No. 2

100 Ark. 166 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 3, 1911

Boston Store v. Schleuter, 88 Ark. 213 , and cases cited. … In the case of Boston Store v.

McClain v. Anderson

246 Ark. 638 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 14, 1969

Russell v. City of Rogers, 236 Ark. 713 , 368 S.W. 2d 89 (1963). The deposition of Mrs. … The same setting is found in the facts of Thiel v. Dove, 229 Ark. 601 , 317 S.W. 2d 121 (1958).

Crossno v. Felts

2014 Ark. 262 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 29, 2014

Cridge v. Hobbs, 2014 Ark. 153 (per curiam) (citing Michalek v. Lockhart, 292 Ark. 301, 730 S.W.2d 210 (1987)). … Brown v. Ark. State HVACR Lic. Bd., 336 Ark. 34, 984 S.W.2d 402 (1999).

Union Indemnity Co. v. Forgey & Hanson

174 Ark. 1110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 17, 1927

Robards v. Brown, 40 Ark. 423 ; Choctaw & Memphis Ry. Co. v. Sullivan, 70 Ark. 262 , 68 S. W. 495 ; and Hill v. American Book Co., 171 Ark. 427 , 285 S. W. 20 . … ; and the board shall not remit or excuse penalty of said bond or breach thereof.”

Lasater v. Western Clay Drainage District

177 Ark. 997 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1928

On May '29, 1917, a resolution was passed by the board, reciting that two-thirds of the time for the completion of the work had expired and it was not one-half done, and requiring’ that Brown be notified “that, if said work … J. 546, § 517; Gauss v. Orr, 46 Ark. 129 ; Kahn v. Metz, 88 Ark. 363 , 114 S. W. 911 ; Edgar Lumber Co. v. Cornie Stave Co., 95 Ark. 449 , 130 S. W. 452 ; Haynes v. Masonic Benefit Co., 98 Ark. 421 , 130 S.

Partin v. State Board of Law Examiners

329 Ark. 496 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 11, 1997

The Board concluded that Petitioner’s efforts at rehabilitation were not complete in view of what members perceived as his lack of candor. On appeal, this court affirmed the Board’s decision. Partin v. … Brown, J., not participating.

Cord-Charlotte School District No. 8 v. Independence County Board of Education

271 Ark. 217 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 24, 1980

In Bell v. Howard County Training School, 236 Ark. 742 , 368 S.W. 2d 266 (1963), we construed these statutes. … The Howard County Board and the district board refused to consent to the transfer of the students on the theory that consent was necessary.

Dewein v. State

114 Ark. 472 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1914

On the night of the killing I had on a bine serge coat and brown corduroy cap and Joe had on a blue shirt and brown tie, a small black cap and was in his shirt sleeves. … Smith v. State, 90 Ark. 435 ; Young v. State, 99 Ark. 407 ; Russell v. State, 97 Ark. 92 .

Jim Orr and Associates, Inc. v. Waters

299 Ark. 526 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 17, 1989

School District No. 45 involved the breach of a contract of employment of a teacher by the Board of Education. … The tort of interference has been defined by this court in Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v.

Proctor v. Hammons

277 Ark. 247 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 1982

No provisions of the Constitution nor subsequent legislation prohibit the voters of a county from approving or disapproving the action taken by the board of governors and the quorum court. In the case of Hodges v. … Brown v. Summerlin Associates, Inc., 272 Ark. 298 , 614 S.W.2d 227 (1981). We cannot say that the decision in this case was clearly erroneous. Thus, the decree rendered by the Chancery Court of St.

Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. Ford

82 Ark. 555 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1907

As soon as Fuller left the machine, and, before Brown returned, Ford attempted to feed the edger, was struck by a board or plank which was violently thrown back from the edger, and was killed. … Prescott & Northern Railway Co. v. Smith, 70 Ark. 183 ; St. Louis S. W. Railway Co. v. Plumlee, 78 Ark. 147 ; Fort Smith L. & T. Co. v. Soard, 79 Ark. 388 .

Mississippi Ouachita & Red River R. R. v. Gaster

20 Ark. 455 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1859

Brown et al., 17 Ark. 443 . … Brown et al., 17 Ark. 443 — show that the defendant had more than sixty days notice of the assessments prior to the commencement of the suit.

Mid-South Ins. Co. v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF FORT SMITH

241 Ark. 935 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 6, 1967

Lyle Brown, Justice. Summary judgment was awarded appellee, First National Bank of Fort Smith, against appellant, Mid-South Insurance Company. … In Epps v. Remmel, 237 Ark. 391 , 373 S. W. 2d 141 (1963),' this court approved the following statement from United States v. Dollar, 100 F.

Wilson v. Arkansas County Board of Education

288 Ark. 557 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1986

Charles School District Board of Education unanimously resolved to petition the Arkansas County Board of Education to annex the district to the Dewitt School District. … Ann. § 80-4609 (c) is mandatory; that once a proper petition is filed pursuant to that section, the county board is without discretion to deny it. Loyd v. Knight, 288 Ark. 474 , 706 S.W.2d 393 (1986).

Jones v. Jones

199 Ark. 1000 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1940

In the case of Brown v. Brown, 172 Ky. 754 , 189 S. W. 921 , the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, construing a statute similar to act No. 20, announced the same conclusion. See, also, Knobe v. … Appellant explained that on account of her health she had no earning capacity except the board paid her by a lady boarder, who lives with appellant in a rented apartment.

Moore v. King

328 Ark. 639 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 27, 1997

Stucco Plus, Inc. v. Rose, 327 Ark. 314 , 938 S.W.2d 556 (1997). We reverse the judgment of the trial court and affirm the decision of the ABC Board to grant the permit. … While the ABC Board conceded that there had been problems with the lodge’s alcohol use in the past, such as the previous conviction of a member selling alcohol and the law enforcement-tolerated “brown-bag” practices, the

West Memphis School District No. 4 v. Circuit Court of Crittenden County

316 Ark. 290 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 7, 1994

Brown, Justice. … The circuit court recognized that intentional actions by board members are not protected by statutory immunity. Deitsch v. Tillery, 309 Ark. 401 , 833 S.W.2d 760 (1992).