Case law

Brown v. Dark

196 Ark. 724 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 4, 1938

Brown’s office. Dr. Brown thought the arm should be X-rayed before any treatment was administered, and suggested availability of a Walnut Ridge physician. Dark told Dr. Brown he knew Dr. McAdams, of Jonesboro; that Dr. … Brown. I .gave Brown no instructions for treatment. The arm was discolored on the 8th when the splint was removed. ...

Brown v. State

258 Ark. 360 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1975

That rule, however, as we pointed out in Abbott v.

Brown v. Kimbrough

263 Ark. 913 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 10, 1978

The record shows that the prosecuting attorney filed two identical actions against the petitioners seeking an adjudication against petitioners Gary Lee Brown and Ralph J. … Skinner v. Mayfield, 246 Ark. 741 , 439 S.W. 2d 651 (1969), and Bassett v. Bourland, 175 Ark. 271 , 299 S.W. 2d 14 (1927).

Wallace v. Brown

17 Ark. 449 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1856

Brown v. Hanauer

48 Ark. 277 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1886

In the case of State Bank v. … See, too, Mays v. Rogers, supra; Stewart v. Smiley, 46 Ark., 373; Graves v. Pinchback, 47 Ark., 470. The decree against Smithwick is affirmed.

Brown v. State

374 Ark. 324 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 25, 2008

See Maxwell, supra (citing Tillman v. State, 364 Ark. 143 , 217 S.W.3d 773 (2005); Webb v. State, 327 Ark. 51 , 938 S.W.2d 806 (1997)). … State, 328 Ark. 241 , 943 S.W.2d 571 (1997); Williams v. State, 303 Ark. 193 , 794 S.W.2d 618 (1990); McGee v. State, 271 Ark. 611 , 609 S.W.2d 73 (1980).

Felton v. Brown

102 Ark. 658 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1912

Squires v. Squires, 65 W. Va. 611 , 64 S. E. 911 ; 13 Current Law, p. 1598, par. 17, note 58. … Brown to come and live with me; He just came anyway, and took possession of the premises; there was no understanding between him and me. When Mr. Brown and Carrie married, there was no ill-feeling existing between us.

Brown v. State

347 Ark. 44 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 29, 2001

In Clemmons v. … Smith v. State, 254 Ark. 538, 542 , 494 S.W.2d 489, 491 (1973). See also Foreman v. State, 328 Ark. 583 , 945 S.W.2d 926 (1997); Griffin v. State, 322 Ark. 206 , 909 S.W.2d 625 (1995); Remeta v.

Brown v. Allen

67 Ark. 386 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 27, 1900

On the contrary, we find no legally sufficient evidence to justify such damages, when the facts are measured by the rule announced by this court in Kelly v.

Wilson v. Brown

320 Ark. 240 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1995

The Wilsons rely on Merriman v. Yutterman, supra, and Rose Lawn Cemetery Assoc., Inc. v. … Smith Gas Co. v. Gean, 186 Ark. 573 , 55 S.W.2d 63 (1932) and Field v. Morris, 88 Ark. 148 , 114 S.W. 306 (1908).

Brown v. Davis

226 Ark. 843 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 29, 1956

A copy of this County Court Order was also sent to the Board of Election Commissioners by the County Clerk. … In the case of Yarbrough v. Beardon and Phillips v. Foreman, 206 Ark. 553 , 177 S. W. 2d 38 , we said “Amendment No. 7 to the constitution has no application.

Brown v. Dortch

34 Ark. 399 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1879

The attachment upon which the proceedings in the case of Dortch et al. v. Mrs. Brown were founded, was properly issued, and duly levied upon the lands. That brought them within the jurisdiction of the court. … It was well said, in the case of Evans & Black v.

Houston v. Brown

23 Ark. 333 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1861

By disallowing Houston’s claim for the thousand dollars expressed in the receipts of Brown, the court affirmed the existence of the partnership, for which Brown contended. … And also denied it by allowing to Brown this set-off of meal and flour.

Brown v. State

109 Ark. 373 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 6, 1913

State v. Nielsen, 51 Ore. 588 , 16 A. & E. Ann. Cases, 1113, and case note; Lemore v. Commonwealth, 105 S. W. (Ky.) 930; State v. Seagraves, 85 S. W. (Mo.) 925; Roberts v. Fullerton, 65 L. R. A. 963. … To the same effect is State v. Metcalf, 65 Mo. App. 681 ; Welsh v. State (Ind.), 9 L. R. A. 664. The judgment will be affirmed.

Brown v. State

321 Ark. 282 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 3, 1995

Brown, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Howard M. … P. 4; Woods v. State, 316 Ark. 705 , 873 S.W.2d 562 (1994) (per curiam); Kelly v. Kelly, 310 Ark. 244 , 835 S.W.2d 869 (1992).

Hicks v. Brown

38 Ark. 469 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1882

Brown v. Lewis

231 Ark. 976 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 4, 1960

Baskin v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 190 Ark. 448 , 79 S. W. 2d 724 . … In White River Limestone Products Co. v. Mo.-Pac. R. Co., 228 Ark. 697 , 310 S.

Brown v. State

321 Ark. 413 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 17, 1995

On appeal, Brown contends the trial court erred in denying her lesser-included instructions and allowing Officer Marshall’s testimony. We affirm. In her first argument, Brown cites Whitner v. … In Roleson v.

Whitmore v. Brown

147 Ark. 147 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1921

Brown for the lots in controversy, and thus disposed of any possible interest she might have in the lots. … Brown-was entitled to have his title quieted. Therefore, the decree must be affirmed.

Brown v. Anderson

210 Ark. 970 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1946

Brown was contestant, and Marion Anderson and Charles Dugan were contestees. … On August 12th, Brown filed this contest, alleging illegal votes and other irregularities and claiming, inter alia, that Brown received the nomination.