Case law

Springs v. Kelley

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 19, 2021

Springs says his trial lawyers’ performance was constitutionally deficient for not challenging the excusal—for cause and hardship—of qualified jurors. … The allegation that a qualified potential juror was excluded is insufficient to demonstrate Strickland prejudice. Young v. Bowersox, 161 F.3d 1159, 1161 (8th Cir. 1998).

Triosim Coporation v. Drake

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 29, 2020

Corporation’s business is due to the personal efforts and goodwill of Jerry Drake, Dale Drake and Tim Drake.”28 The Non-Compete Agreement stated that “Owners are the managers of Seller and have been instrumental in establishing … Code Ann. § 4-75-601(4) and holding that courts should apply the following six factors in determining whether information qualifies as a trade secret: (1) “the extent to which the information is known outside the business

Simmons v. USAble Corporation

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 30, 2021

provided regulations that include factors to guide 46  Case 4:20-cv-00137-KGB Document 40 Filed 09/30/21 Page 47 of 56 the Court in determining whether an employee qualifies … Department of Labor and federal precedent established under the [FLSA] in interpreting and applying the provisions of the Act and Rule 010.14-100 through -113, except to the extent a different interpretation is clearly required

Brandt v. Griffin

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 20, 2023

The Court finds that he is not qualified to offer relevant opinions given his lack of experience related to gender dysphoria. 301. Dr. … administering” of gender transition treatment which is conduct not speech.). 77  Case 4:21-cv-00450-JM Document 283 Filed 06/20/23 Page 78 of 80 As written, Act 626 clearly