Case law

Carter v. Bruce Oakley, Inc.

849 F. Supp. 673 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 5, 1993

Brown v. General Motors Corp., 601 F.2d 956, 959 (8th Cir.1979) (footnote omitted). The Court will address whether Mr. Carter meets this three-part test. 1. … Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook, 479 U.S. 60, 67 , 107 S.Ct. 367, 371 , 93 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986), citing Hardison, supra 432 U.S. at 84 , 97 S.Ct. at 2277 .

Stevenson v. Blytheville School District No. 5

955 F. Supp. 2d 971 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 1, 2013

See, e.g., Doremus v. Board of Education of Borough of Hawthorne, 342 U.S. 429 , 72 S.Ct. 394 , 96 L.Ed. 475 (1952). … V.

Rogers v. Kelly

674 F. Supp. 1372 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 2, 1987

See also Pollock v. … In Memphis Community School District v.

Cloud v. McLean-Arkansas Lumber Co.

28 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 3, 1939

Railway Co. v. … It is true that the court retained jurisdiction in Gainsville v. Brown-Crummer Investment Company, 277 U.S. 54 , 48 S.Ct. 454 , 72 L.Ed. 781 , and in Barnette v.

Alsobrook v. United States

431 F. Supp. 1122 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 7, 1977

While the Bank had a Board of Directors, none of the members other than Mr. Alsobrook took an active- part in the management of the Bank’s affairs prior to November, 1967. Board membership was an honor bestowed by Mr. … Until December 1, 1967, the Board had no loan committee, and Mr. Alsobrook personally supervised the loan officers and generally oversaw the loans made by the Bank with subsequent ratification by the Board.

Gibson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

620 F. Supp. 85 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 29, 1985

board engineer. 24. … Otten v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co., 205 F.2d 58, 61 (2nd Cir.1953).

McCurdy v. Arkansas State Police

275 F. Supp. 2d 982 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 4, 2003

See Lambert v. City of Dumas, 187 F.3d 931, 934 (8th Cir.1999). … See Todd v. Ortho Biotech, Inc., 175 F.3d 595, 598 (8th Cir.1999) (discussing actual supervisory authority) 1 ; see also Alverio v.

GREEN PARTY OF ARKANSAS v. Daniels

733 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 20, 2010

Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party, 520 U.S. 351, 358 , 117 S.Ct. 1364 , 137 L.Ed.2d 589 (1997); see also Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428, 433 , 112 S.Ct. 2059 , 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992); Jenness v. … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). The Green Party and Secretary Daniels agree on the legal standard governing these judgments.

Jones v. Clinton

12 F. Supp. 2d 931 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 1, 1998

Browning’s motion at that time. … See Section V, infra.

Newport Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States

259 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 3, 1966

Hurd v. Sheffield Steel Corporation, 8 Cir., 181 F.2d 269 ; Poole v. Gillison, E.D.Ark., 15 F.R.D. 194 ; 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 2128. … Old Colony Railroad Co. v. C. I. R., 284 U.S. 552, 562 , 52 S.Ct. 211 , 76 L.Ed. 484 ; Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. C. I. R., 8 Cir., 52 F.2d 372 ; South Side Building and Loan Association v.

LasikPlus Murphy, M.D., P.A. v. LCA-Vision, Inc.

776 F. Supp. 2d 886 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 4, 2011

Murphy and LasikPlus Murphy filed an administrative complaint with the Arkansas State Medical Board against Dr. Murphy complaining, inter alia, that Dr. … Brown to ensure a smooth transition of your care from LasikPlus to TLC. LCA Vision is currently serving as custodian of your medical records.

Goldberg v. McDaniel

209 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 20, 1962

Archer v. … See especially footnote No. 2 in Mitchell v. Vollmer, supra; Lublin, supra; Archer v. Brown & Root, Inc., supra, 241 F.2d at pp. 667-668.

Walker v. Jackson

391 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 18, 1975

Clinton v. Morrow, 220 Ark. 377 , 247 S.W.2d 1015 (1952). And in the earlier case of Kirk v. … Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.), aff’d, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); and Bradley v. *1404 School Board of Richmond, 53 F.R.D. 28 (E.D.Va.1971).

Gibson v. DuPree

501 F. Supp. 259 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Nov 13, 1980

The case of Board of School Commissioners of The City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs, 420 U.S. 128 , 95 S.Ct. 848 , 43 L.Ed.2d 74 (1975) is directly in point. … See also DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 , 94 S.Ct. 1704 , 40 L.Ed.2d 164 (1974) for another such holding on similar facts. In a recent decision, Ward v.

Wake v. Harmony Grove School District 614

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 29, 2021

Montgomery v. … Furthermore, in spite of Plaintiff’s allegations to the contrary, Arkansas law is clear that only the school board has policy-making authority for school districts. Wolfe v. Fayetteville, Arkansas Sch. Dist., 600 F.

Robinson v. Mabry

476 F. Supp. 1022 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 26, 1979

The Court distinguished this situation from that of parole revocation in Morrissey v. … Greenholtz v. Nebraska, supra.

Thomas v. Gardner

273 F. Supp. 885 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 8, 1967

We believe that Judge Brown has aptly stated the applicable principle in Langford v. Flemming, 276 F.2d 215, 219 (5 Cir. 1960): “ ‘Good cause by its very nature calls for the evaluation of many subtle factors. … See Judge Brown’s remarks in Langford v. Flemming, supra, 276 F.2d at 218 .

City of North Little Rock v. Union Pacific Railroad

808 F. Supp. 2d 1102 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 21, 2011

Co. v. Chi. Transit Auth., No. 07CV229, 2009 WL 448897 , *5 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 23, 2009) (citing CSX Transp. v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 944 F.Supp. 1573, 1581 (N.D.Ga.1996)). See also City of Auburn v. … Co. v. City of St. Paul, — F.Supp.2d-, -, 2010 WL 2540695 , *3 (D.Minn. June 17, 2010); Wisconsin Cent. Ltd. v.

United States v. Little Rock Sewer Committee

460 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 19, 1978

In United States v. … In Apex Oil Co. v.

United States v. Price

441 F. Supp. 814 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Dec 7, 1977

trim around the top and bottom and brown shutters.” … Dyton v. Ellingsworth, 306 F.Supp. 231 (D.Del.1969); United States ex rel Manduchi v.