Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,831 results
0.49s
Macklin v. FMC Transport, Inc.
85 F. Supp. 3d 1014 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 12, 2015
FMC Transport cites the case of Robinson v. … Robinson v. Am. Red Cross, 753 F.3d 749, 754 (8th Cir.2014).
Cited 0 timesPublished860 F. Supp. 636 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 1, 1994
Darryl V. … In Connecticut Board of Pardons v.
Cited 1 timesPublished495 F. Supp. 1285 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 8, 1980
This precise holding cannot survive the Supreme Court’s opinion in Brown v. G. S. … As the Supreme Court said in Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405, 418 , 95 S.Ct. 2362, 2372 , 45 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975): . it is the historic purpose of equity to “secur[e] complete justice,” Brown v.
Modified by Taylor v. Jones, 653 F.2d 1193 (1981)Cited 15 timesPublishedFederal Reserve Bank v. Metrocentre Improvement District 1
492 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 23, 1980
Pearl v. United States, supra; Goddard v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, 287 F.2d 343 (D.C. … No. 1 of Lafayette County, Ark. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished495 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 24, 1980
Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 , 99 S.Ct. 2248 , 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). See, also, Wong Sun v. … Dunaway v. New York, supra, at 217, 99 S.Ct. at 2258, citing Brown v. Illinois, supra. The focus must be upon the causal connection between the initial illegality and the subsequent confession.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLowry ex rel. Crow v. Watson Chapel School District
508 F. Supp. 2d 713 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 22, 2007
Citing United States v. … The plaintiffs cite as contrary authority Bishop v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSutton v. Marianna School District A
573 F. Supp. 159 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 30, 1983
Wood, 426 U.S. 341 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), or with a liberty interest, compare Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 [2705], 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1971), with Perry v. … Taking that conclusion a step further, the court in Atencio v. Board of Education of Penasco Indep. Sch.
Cited 2 timesPublished830 F. Supp. 1251 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 27, 1993
Barnes v. Small, 840 F.2d 972, 976 (D.C.Cir.1988). … Wu v. Thomas, 863 F.2d 1543, 1549 (11th Cir.1989).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLittle Rock Sch. Dist. v. PULASKI CTY. SPEC. SCH.
597 F. Supp. 1220 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Nov 19, 1984
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1967). … Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBurris v. Sewer Improvement District No. 147
743 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 29, 1990
(hereinafter “Board”). … See Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 484-91 , 108 S.Ct. 1340, 1344-48 , 99 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988); Mennonite Board of Missions v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLowry v. WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DIST.
508 F. Supp. 2d 713 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 22, 2007
Citing United States v. … The plaintiffs cite as contrary authority Bishop v.
Cited 0 timesPublished173 F. Supp. 817 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 17, 1959
In Woolfort v. … As stated in Hawks v.
Cited 3 timesPublished715 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 13, 1989
(b) The filing of a report with the board pursuant to this section, investigation by the board, or any disposition by the board shall not, in and of itself, preclude any action by a hospital or other health care facility … HCA Health Servs. of Midwest, Inc. v. National Bank of Commerce, 294 Ark. 525 , 745 S.W.2d 120 (1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Surety Corporation v. Inland Properties, Inc.
286 F. Supp. 173 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 12, 1968
No corporate *180 record of the transaction was made, and the board of directors knew nothing about it until after the death of DeLong. 3 Upon learning of what DeLong had done, the board promptly repudiated his act. … Brown Broadcast, Inc. v. Pepper Sound Studio, 242 Ark. 701 , 416 S.W.2d 284 ; B. & P. Inc. v. Norment, 241 Ark. 1092 , 411 S.W.2d 506 ; United Press International, Inc. v.
Cited 36 timesPublished383 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 11, 1974
Toth v. United States, supra, at page 38. … See Anderson v. Simpson, (E.D.Tenn.1972), unpublished, Docket CA 62-18 and 63-58; Junior E. Baisden v. United States of America, Civil Action 69-64, (S.D.Ohio 1970); Cf. Robles v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedClaiborne Ex Rel. Claiborne v. Beebe School District
687 F. Supp. 1358 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 6, 1988
The Court is aware that it cannot impose its interpretation of school regulations in place of a school board’s construction of its regulations. Board of Education of Rogers, Ark v. … See, Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 , 103 S.Ct. 1855 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983); Bystrom v. Fridley High Sch., Ind. Sch. Dist. 14, 822 F.2d 747 (8th Cir.1987); Anable v. Ford, 653 F.Supp. 22 (W.D.Ark.1985).
Cited 0 timesPublished458 F. Supp. 720 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 5, 1978
V. … Hutto, 410 F.Supp. 251 and Hutto v.
Cited 8 timesPublished208 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 6, 1962
Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . … Under these circumstances, as stated in Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRauhoff v. Henry Gramling & Co.
42 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 22, 1941
National Labor Relations Board v. Fainblatt, 306 U.S. 601 , 307 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 668 , 83 L.Ed. 1014 , in the case of Goldberg v. … Fainblatt, supra, and National Labor Relations Board v. Gulf Public Service Co., supra.
Cited 9 timesPublished599 F. Supp. 1524 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Dec 31, 1984
Craik v. Minnesota State University Board, 731 F.2d 465 (8th Cir. 1984). … Craik v. Minnesota State University Board, supra at 468, n. 5. 13.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna