Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,831 results
5.22s
Gatlin v. Missouri-Pacific Railroad
475 F. Supp. 1083 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 5, 1979
As the Court noted in Auto Workers v. … Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSmith v. Cleburne County Hospital
667 F. Supp. 644 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 10, 1987
In other words, the medical staff was the alter ego of the Board. Thus, the action of the medical staff was in essence a “decision officially adopted and promulgated by the [Board].” Monell v. … Official Court Stenographer, 251 F.Supp. 945 (E.D.Pa.1966); Davis v. Board of Trustees of Arkansas A & M College, 270 F.Supp. 528 (E.D.Ark.1967).
Cited 1 timesPublished595 F. Supp. 878 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 11, 1984
Board of Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1955); Seal v. Pryor, supra; by an implied contract, Bishop v. Wood, supra; Perry v. Sindermann, supra; Seal v. Pryor, supra; Gerrin v. … Bishop v. Wood, supra; Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Perry v. Sindermann, supra; Gilbreath v. Arkansas Planning and Development Commission, Inc., supra; and Gerrin v. Hickey, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublishedStevenson v. Blytheville School District No. 5
955 F. Supp. 2d 955 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 1, 2013
Davenport v. University of Arkansas Board of Trustees, 553 F.3d 1110, 1114 (8th Cir.2009); Bituminous Materials, Inc. v. Rice Co., Minn., 126 F.3d 1068, 1070 (8th Cir.1997). … See Board of Trustees of University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 366-67 , 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFalls City Const. Co. v. Monroe County
208 F. 482 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 27, 1913
The same rule has been recognized and followed by the Supreme Court of Arkansas in Grider v. Apperson, 32 Ark. 332, 335 ; Moore v. Emerick, 38 Ark. 203, 204 . See, also, Barber Asphalt Co. v. Morris, 66 C. C. … That the board of supervisors had no judicial powers is unquestioned, as will be noticed by reference to chapter 170 of Gantt’s Digest, and it was so expressly held by the Supreme Court of this state in Maxey v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJackson v. First Federal Sav. of Arkansas, FA
709 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Nov 15, 1988
In Lipton v. … In Dekro v.
Cited 15 timesPublished247 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Nov 15, 1965
Cole v. Smith, 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 721 ; Snow v. Gladden, 9 Cir., 338 F.2d 999 ; Sutton v. Settle, 8 Cir., 302 F.2d 286 ; Williams v. Steele, 8 Cir., 194 F.2d 32 , rehearing denied, 194 F.2d 917 ; Garcia v. … V.
Cited 63 timesPublished660 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 7, 1987
Fountain v. Chicago R.I. & P. Ry. 243 Ark. 947 , 422 S.W.2d 878 (1968); See St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. v. Pennington, 261 Ark. 650, 677 , 553 S.W.2d 436, 449 (1977). In St. Louis Southwestern Railroad Co. v. … In Scoville v.
Cited 3 timesPublished574 B.R. 701 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 7, 2017
See Keenihan v. Heritage Press, Inc., 19 F.3d 1255, 1258 (8th Cir. 1994). … In other words, a board of directors has authority to decide whether the entity will file for bankruptcy because that authority is delegated to the board. See Boyce v. Chem.
Cited 4 timesPublished310 F. Supp. 289 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 18, 1970
In Brown v. Stephens, E.D.Ark., 246 F.Supp. 1009 , Brown and Satterfield were arrested on suspicion by members of the Little Rock Police Department and were confined in the City. Jail. … Counsel for movants have called the attention of the Court to United States v. McIntyre, E.D.La., 304 F.Supp. 1244 .
Cited 1 timesPublished594 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 13, 1984
On March 10, 1983 plaintiff moved that this case be consolidated with Clark v. Board of Education, No. LR-C-64-155, the Little Rock school consolidation case presently assigned to Judge Overton. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) a teacher gave a radio station the substance of a memo relating to teacher dress and appearance.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLittle Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1
666 F. Supp. 159 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 7, 1987
EEOC v. … S.E.C. v. Randolph, 736 F.2d 525 (9th Cir.1984).
Cited 2 timesPublishedPlanned Parenthood Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. Selig
313 F.R.D. 81 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 25, 2016
Brown v. Kerkhoff, 279 F.R.D. 479, 496 (S.D. Iowa 2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). … See Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLittle Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1
560 F. Supp. 876 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 13, 1983
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). … United States v. State of Missouri, 515 F.2d 1365, 1370 (8th Cir.1975) quoting Oliver v. Michigan State Board of Education, 508 F.2d 178, 182 (6th Cir.1974).
Cited 1 timesPublishedJones v. Singer Career Systems
584 F. Supp. 1253 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 26, 1984
Stanley v. … v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedArkansas Day Care Ass'n, Inc. v. Clinton
577 F. Supp. 388 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Nov 22, 1983
[the “Board”]. … Attention is directed to cases such as Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306 , 72 S.Ct. 679 , 96 L.Ed. 954 (1952), and Walz v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGlass Bottle Blowers Ass'n of United States & Canada v. Arkansas Glass Container Corp.
183 F. Supp. 829 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 31, 1960
Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln Mills, 1957, 353 U.S. 448 , at page 451, 77 S.Ct. 912 , 1 L.Ed.2d 972 . … Whatever effect affirmative action by the Board upon an allegation of unfair labor practice would have on a right to arbitrate, we do not believe that failure by the Board to find an unfair labor practice constituted a waiver
Cited 9 timesPublished774 F. Supp. 2d 953 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 28, 2011
See Baca v. … Torres v.
Cited 6 timesPublished495 F. Supp. 1285 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 8, 1980
This precise holding cannot survive the Supreme Court’s opinion in Brown v. G. S. … As the Supreme Court said in Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405, 418 , 95 S.Ct. 2362, 2372 , 45 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975): . it is the historic purpose of equity to “secur[e] complete justice,” Brown v.
Modified by Taylor v. Jones, 653 F.2d 1193 (1981)Cited 15 timesPublishedFederal Reserve Bank v. Metrocentre Improvement District 1
492 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 23, 1980
Pearl v. United States, supra; Goddard v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, 287 F.2d 343 (D.C. … No. 1 of Lafayette County, Ark. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna