Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,250 results
1.19s
527 F. Supp. 54 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 8, 1981
Druid City Hospital Board, 333 So.2d 796 (Ala.1976), a verdict was returned for the plaintiff and the trial court granted defendant’s motion for judgment N.O.V. … See Lehrman v.
Cited 8 timesPublished356 F. Supp. 3d 1351 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Jan 28, 2019
African-American Affairs Council v. … Hazeltine , 336 F.Supp.2d 976 (D.S.D. 2004) ; Old Person v. Brown , 182 F.Supp.2d 1002 (D. Mont. 2002). Neither the court nor Defendant could find any purely Section 2 cases heard by a three-judge panel.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFrahn v. Tennessee Valley Authority
41 F. Supp. 83 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Oct 2, 1941
The three judge District Court, Atlanta v. … In the case of Massachusetts v. Mellon, supra, Mr.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTouchton v. Dover Corp./Rotary Lift Division
319 F. Supp. 2d 1290 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 24, 2004
.”); Implement Service, Inc. v. … Brown v. Owen Litho Service Inc., 179 Ind.App. 198 , 384 N.E.2d 1132, 1135 (1979) (emphasis added) (footnotes omitted).
Cited 1 timesPublishedHardie-Tynes, Co. v. SKF USA, Inc.
255 F. Supp. 3d 1176 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Jun 5, 2017
Ashcroft v. … Steger v. General Electric Company, 318 F.3d 1066, 1080 (11th Cir. 2003); see also Henson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedA.H. v. Jackson-Olin High School
District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 4, 2020
Looney v. Moore, 886 F.3d 1058, 1062 (11th Cir. 2018) (quotation marks omitted). A.H.’s only remaining claim is that the Board violated the ADA. (Docs. 12, 22). … that question, see United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRosen v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
308 F.R.D. 670 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Jul 9, 2015
Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir.1992). Exercising this discretion, the court now undertakes to resolve the parties’ multi-faceted discovery dispute. … See Bryant v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBurns v. Gadsden State Community College
766 F. Supp. 1049 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Apr 15, 1991
Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 , 94 S.Ct. 1347 , 39 L.Ed.2d 662 (1974); Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332 , 99 S.Ct. 1139 , 59 L.Ed.2d 358 (1979); and Brandon v. … See Lincoln v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Ga. Sys., 697 F.2d 928, 934 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 826 , 104 S.Ct. 97 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983).
Cited 1 timesPublishedE S Robbins Corp. v. Eastman Chemical Co.
912 F. Supp. 1476 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 28, 1995
Brown v. City of Clewiston, 848 F.2d 1534 , 1540 n. 12 (11th Cir.1988). … Brown, 858 F.Supp. 1130, 1138-39 (N.D.Fla.1994) (holding that § 9607(a)(3) does not include intent requirement).
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 29, 2021
Sanchez v. … Raney “submitted a formal complaint” to Brown, but Raney claims Brown did not address the potentially unlawful billing that resulted from this employee’s alleged misconduct. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · Feb 11, 2022
ServPro told the Board about this federal case and said that it understood the Board’s rules prevented the Board from ruling on its claim against JSU until this court decides the case against the individual JSU Defendants … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknown215 F. Supp. 2d 1268 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Aug 2, 2002
Brown v. City of Clemston, 848 F.2d 1534 , 1540 n. 12 (11th Cir.1988). DISCUSSION Because Solutia’s Pension Plan is an “employee benefit plan” within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1002 , ERISA applies and controls. … See Pegram v. Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211, 226-27 , 120 S.Ct. 2143 , 147 L.Ed.2d 164 (2000); Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464, 1471 (11th Cir.1986).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJustice v. North American Acceptance Corp.
363 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Aug 21, 1973
See Mobile Housing Board v. Cross, 285 Ala. 94 , 229 So.2d 485 (1969); and McGregor v. McGregor, 249 Ala. 75 , 29 So.2d 561 (1947), and cases cited therein.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones v. Alabama A&M University
District Court, N.D. Alabama · Mar 10, 2021
Jones also asserts that the Board violated the procedures in A&M’s Faculty Handbook when the Board terminated him. (Doc. 29, pp. 11-12). See, e.g., Chavez v. Credit Nation Auto Sales, LLC, 641 Fed. … Jones’s disparate treatment claim against the Board. V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJames Outdoor LLC v. City of Northport Alabama
District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 28, 2024
But “federal courts do not sit as zoning boards of review and should be most circumspect in determining that constitutional rights are violated in quarrels over zoning decisions.” Spence v. … First, James Outdoor correctly describes Alabama law: on appeal, “[t]he scope of inquiry is the same as that before the” zoning board. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Hueytown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMadison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.
340 F. Supp. 3d 1232 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 28, 2018
Brown Mach. Works , 659 So.2d at 60 . … Vines v. Crescent Transit Co. , 264 Ala. 114 , 85 So.2d 436 , 439-40 (1955) (citations omitted); see also Brown-Marx Assocs., Ltd. v. Emigrant Sav.
Cited 6 timesPublished250 F. Supp. 3d 1215 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Apr 24, 2017
Beneath the logo was text stating, “No cross-board reposts, ,7z preferred, encrypt filen-ames, include preview, Peace out.” … U.S. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished22 F. Supp. 2d 1296 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 30, 1998
Or, even if there is some added incidental repression of speech, deference must be granted to the law makin g authority under Board of Trustees v. … See Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 462-463 , and n. 7, 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2291 , and n. 7, 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Police Dept. of Chicago v.
Reversed on other grounds by Ranch House, Inc. v. Amerson, 238 F.3d 1273 (2001)Cited 9 timesPublishedBean v. United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers
861 F. Supp. 1554 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 9, 1994
Trades Council v. … DelCostello v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · Jun 23, 2026
Morrissette-Brown v. Mobile Infirmary Med. Ctr., 506 F.3d 1317, 1321–22 (11th Cir. 2007) (quoting Beadle v. Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Dept., 29 F.3d 589, 592 (11th Cir. 1994)). … See Walden v. Centers for Dis. Contr. & Prev., 669 F.3d 1277, 1294 (11th Cir. 2012), abrogated on other grounds by Abercrombie, 575 U.S. 768 (2015); Morrissette-Brown, 506 F.3d at 1324.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna