Case law

Alabama State Federation of Teachers v. James

490 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Apr 21, 1980

In Finch v. … See, Pappanastos v. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama, Slip Op. 4509 (M.D.Ala. April 8, 1980).

Howell v. Circuit City

330 F. Supp. 2d 1314 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 12, 2004

See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 , 114 S.Ct. 1673 , 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994); Burns v. Windsor Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 1092, 1095 (1994); Wymbs v. … See Marshall v. CSX Transp. Co., 916 F.Supp. 1150 (M.D.Ala.1995) (De Ment, J.); Brown v. TranSouth Fin. Corp., 897 F.Supp. 1398 (M.D.Ala.1995) (De Ment, J.); *1318 Tompkins v.

Walton Ex Rel. RW v. MONTGOMERY CY. BD. OF EDUC.

371 F. Supp. 2d 1318 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 20, 2005

The claims against the individual Defendants in their official capacities are redundant of the claims against the Board. See Godby v. … See Palmer v. Perry County Board of Education, 496 So.2d 2, 5 (Ala.1986) (school board members in official capacity are immune on the basis of sovereign immunity); Hickman v.

Herbert v. Harris (INMATE 2)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 8, 2022

Alabama Code § 41-9-60 (1975) provides for the State Board of Adjustment to consider claims against the State of Alabama or its agents by filing a claim with the State Board of Adjustment. Smith v. … Storey, 936 F.2d 554, 561 (11th Cir. 1991) (explaining that “as long as some adequate post-deprivation remedy is available, no due process violation has occurred”); Browning v.

Price v. Alfa Mutual Insurance

877 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 6, 1995

Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 10 , 103 5. Ct. at 2846 (quoting Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74, 75-76 , 34 S.Ct. 724, 724 , 58 L.Ed. 1218 (1914)). … Baldwin County Eastern Shore Hospital Board, Inc. v. Windham, 706 F.Supp. 38, 40 (S.D.Ala.1989); Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co., 633 F.Supp. 43, 45 (S.D.Ala.1986); See also, Moore v.

United States v. Harper

141 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 22, 1956

The Court concluded that the board was justified in deciding that Cox had not established his ministerial status. In the case of Neal v. … Buttecali v. United States, 5 Cir., 130 F.2d 172 ; United States ex rel. Hull v. Staffer, 7 Cir., 151 F.2d 633 .

United States v. Persall

302 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 9, 1969

If no “basis in fact” is found to exist, then the Board is considered to be without jurisdiction, and the classification is considered void. Estep v. … The draft boards and the Courts are bound to carry out that policy.” Quoting Dickinson v.

L.Q.A. ex rel. Arrington v. Eberhart

920 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 21, 1996

Specifically, the court finds that a school board and its employees constitute one entity incapable of forming the alleged conspiracy. See Moody v. Jefferson Parish Sch. … Ferguson, 30 F.3d 649 (5th Cir.1994) (holding that a school board and its employees constituted one entity); Hull v.

Priori v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

92 F. Supp. 2d 1264 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Apr 11, 2000

Kohn v. … V.

Montgomery Light & Water Power Co. v. Charles

258 F. 723 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 15, 1919

Co. v. Smith, 128 Fed. 1 , 63 C. C. A. 1 ; Sharon v. Tucker, 144 U. S. *728 533 , 12 Sup. Ct. 720, 36 L. Ed. 532 ; Hale v. Allison, supra; I. C. C. R. Co. v. Garrison, 81 Misc. 257 , 32 South. 996 , 95 Am. St. … It seems, from the testimony, that the equivalent of the water stored by these boards was flowing into the pond every 30 minutes, and, conceding that the boards collapsed simultaneously, the released water would have had

James v. Wallace

386 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 12, 1974

Myers v. Anderson, 238 U.S. 368 , [ 35 S.Ct. 932 , 59 L.Ed. 1349 ] (1915). See generally Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , [ 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 ] (1961); Moor v. … As stated in Scheuer v.

Dillard v. Town of Louisville

730 F. Supp. 1546 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 7, 1990

See, e.g., Dillard v. Town of Cuba, 708 F.Supp. 1244 (M.D.Ala.1988); Dillard v. Chilton County Board of Education, 699 F.Supp. 870 (M.D.Ala.1988). … See Dillard v. Baldwin County Board of Education, 686 F.Supp. 1459, 1466 (M.D.Ala.1988).

Giles v. City of Prattville

556 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 3, 1983

States v. … The Delgado decision was cited with approval by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Brown v. Vance, 637 F.2d 272, 282 (5th Cir.1981).

Forbush v. Wallace

341 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 28, 1971

Flowers, 387 U.S. 97, 101 , 87 S.Ct. 1544 , 18 L.Ed.2d 643 (1967); Griffin v. County School Board, 377 U.S. 218, 227-228 , 84 S.Ct. 1226 , 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1964). … E. g., McDonald v. Board of Election Commissioners, 1969, 394 U.S. 802, 808-809 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 ; Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilots Commissioners, 1947, 330 U.S. 552 , 67 S.Ct. 910 , 91 L.Ed. 1093 .

Gamper v. STATE OF ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

968 F. Supp. 1483 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 5, 1997

under such condition as the board may determine. … Hatcher v.

Sharp v. City of Montgomery

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 17, 2021

See Baker v. … Brown v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 923 F.2d 1474, 1481 (11th Cir. 1991) (citation and quotation marks omitted). “Normally random acts or isolated incidents are insufficient to establish a custom or policy.”

Hamm v. Lake View Community Hospital

950 F. Supp. 330 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 2, 1996

First, the Williams court held that the Board could be held liable as an agent of the City in the Board’s official capacity, not the members’ individual capacities. … V.

United States v. Flowers

444 F. Supp. 2d 1192 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jun 30, 2006

United States v. Flowers, 372 F.Supp.2d 1319 (M.D.Ala.2005) (Thompson, J.). … The across-the-board rule, while narrowly tailored when imposed to redress the State’s across-the-board discrimination at that time, is no longer narrowly tailored to redress the specific types of alleged racially discriminatory

Jordan v. Wright

417 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 12, 1976

Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 , 93 S.Ct. 1764 , 36 L.Ed.2d 583 (1973); Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 , 92 S.Ct. 251 , 30 L.Ed.2d 225 (1971). … See Long v. Sapp, 502 F.2d 34 (5th Cir. 1974).

Fleming v. Dowdell

434 F. Supp. 2d 1138 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 29, 2005

Parole board members are entitled to judicial immunity when they perform adjudicatory functions in connection with granting, denying or revoking parole. See Sultenfuss v. … Skelton, 502 F.2d 1101, 1101-02 (5th Cir.1974) (holding that a state’s board of pardons and paroles is entitled to absolute immunity in refusing parole to a prisoner because the board performs adjudicatory roles which are