Case law

Ezzell v. State

13 Ala. App. 156 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1915

—Noles v. State, 26 Ala. 31 , 62 Am. Dec. 711 ; Eiland v. State, 52 Ala. 328 ; Bostic v. State, 94 Ala. 47 , 10 South. 602 ; Brown v. State, 109 Ala. 90 , 20 South. 103 ; Dryer v. State, 139 Ala. 119 , 36 South. 38 . … —Code, § 6270; Brown v. State, supra; Sanderson v.

Nolen v. State

35 Ala. App. 249 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1950

Scheuer v. Kelly, 121 Ala. 323 , 26 So. 4 ; Nichols v. Nichols, 192 Ala. 206 , 68 So. 186 . … Justice Brown, now of the Supreme Court, but then a member of this court, set out the acts pertaining to the boundary line between these two counties.

Tyson v. Jennings Produce Co.

16 Ala. App. 374 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 1917

As was said by Judge Brown, in the case of Citizens’ National Bank v. Bucheit, 14 Ala. … Allen v. Tyson-Jones Buggy Co., 91 Tex. 22 , 40 S. W. 393, 714 ; Brown Seed Co. v. Richardson, 53 Misc. Rep. 517 , 103 N. Y. Supp. 243 . In the case of Atlas Engine Works v. Parkinson (D.

Mann v. State

33 Ala. App. 148 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 27, 1947

Sandlin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 583 , 99 So. 784 ; Cline v. State, 20 Ala.App. 578 , 104 So. 347 ; Sharp v. State, 23 Ala.App. 457 , 126 So. 895 ; Davis v. State, 24 Ala.App. 190 , 132 So. 458 ; McCleskey v. … Among the grounds of objection to the introduction of the above pay roll sheets was the fact that cn some of the sheets certain names appearing thereon had been hidden from view by having placed over them a piece of opaque brown

Jones v. State

38 Ala. App. 325 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1955

See also Lambert v. State, 205 Ala. 547 , 88 So. 847 ; Brown v. State, 249 Ala. 433 , 31 So.2d 656 . … Roberts v. State, 68 Ala. 156 ; Savage v. State, 20 Ala.App. 97 , 100 So. 919 ; Smith v. State, ante, p. 23, 80 So.2d 302 .

State v. Bush

12 Ala. App. 309 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1915

BROWN, J. … —Davis v. State, 68 Ala. 63 , 44 Am. Rep. 128 .

State v. Dodd

17 Ala. App. 20 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1919

BROWN, P. J. … Anthony v. State, 29 Ala. 27 ; Turnipseed v. State, 6 Ala. 664 ; Beasley v. State, 18 Ala. 535 .

Dothan Grocery Co. v. White Bros.

14 Ala. App. 405 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1915

BROWN, J. Action by appellant on account for goods sold to appellees. … —Orr v. Stewart, 13 Ala.

Ex Parte Mooneyham

16 Ala. App. 499 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 14, 1918

BROWN, P. J. … understood by the court, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that said motion be- and is hereby granted, and the judgment heretofore rendered in this cause is hereby set aside, and held for naught, on authority of Alford v.

Moore v. Jacobs

39 Ala. App. 49 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1957

Brown v. Brown, 213 Ala. 339 , 105 So. 171 . … In the case of Chenoweth v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 50 Mont. 481 , 148 P. 330 , a verdict of $25,000 in. favor of plaintiff and against defendant was returned and judgment entered thereon.

State v. Richard Murray & Co.

26 Ala. App. 90 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1934

Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 6 L. Ed. 678 . … Texas Transport & Terminal Co. v. City of New Orleans, 264 U. S. 150 , 44 S. Ct. 242 , 68 L. Ed. 611 , 34 A. L. R. 907.

Stout v. State

15 Ala. App. 206 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

BROWN, J. (1-3) There was some evidence from which the jury were authorized to infer that the defendant was keeping the liquors in the shed room of the old warehouse owned by the Cook Brewing Company. … App. 46 , 70 South. 991 ; Ella Smith v. State, 197 Ala. 193 , 72 South. 316 .

Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Dawson

14 Ala. App. 272 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 13, 1915

BROWN, J. … Co. v. Wilson, 1 Ala. App. 308 , 55 South. 932 . In Sullivan v.

Childs v. State

16 Ala. App. 392 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1918

The rules and regulations authorized to be enacted by. the state live stock sanitary board, when adopted, are in the nature of ordinances, and as such must *393 be pleaded and proved before the courts will permit them to … We tried to give the correct rule in Powell v. State, 75 South. 269 , 1 and while that part of the opinion was dictum in that ease, we adhere to it here. The demurrer should have been sustained.

Bufford v. State

23 Ala. App. 521 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1930

Pellum v. State, 89 Ala. 28, 32 , 8 So. 83 ; Lee v. State, 18 Ala. App. 566 , 93 So. 59 ; Anderson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 585 , 93 So. 279 ; Suttle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 198 ; 96 So. 90 ; Harrison v. State, 21 Ala. … Veasey v. State, 20 Ala. App. 478 , 103 So. 67 ; Brown v. State, 118 Ala. 111 , 23 So. 81 . It was error also to refuse charge 36. Davis v. State, 8 Ala. App. 147, 162 , 62 So. 1027 ; Salm v.

Nix v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

25 Ala. App. 448 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 16, 1933

Co. v. Kimbrell (Ala. Sup.) 145 So. 433 , 1 and authorities therein cited. … Justice Brown for our'Supreme Court in the opinion in the case of Futvoye et al. v.

Plain v. City of Birmingham

16 Ala. App. 468 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 28, 1918

BROWN, P. J. … Hewlett v. State, 135 Ala. 59 , 33 South. 662 ; White v. State, 7 Ala. App. 69 , 61 South. 463 ; Gerrish v. State, 53 Ala. 476 .

Rogers v. State

15 Ala. App. 148 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

. — Friedman Bros. v. … . — - Patterson v. State, 171 Ala. 2 , 54 South. 696 ; McEwen v. State, 152 Ala. 38 , 44 South. 619 ; Gregory v. State, 140 Ala. 16 , 37 South. 259 . In McHugh v.

Hendrix v. State

25 Ala. App. 402 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1933

In the opinion in Tatum v. State 20 Ala. … Brown v. State, 118 Ala. 111 , 23 So. 81 . The appellant in this case stands convicted of a felony; his conviction rests entirely and solely upon circumstantial evidence.

Stephens v. State

36 Ala. App. 57 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1951

State, 91 Fla. 396 , 107 So. 535 ; Brown v. State, 250 Ala. 444 , 35 So.2d 518 . … Hysler v. State, 146 Fla. *59 593, 1 So.2d 628 ; Chesser v. State, 92 Fla. 754 , 109 So. 906 .