Case law

Cox v. State

36 Ala. App. 99 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 29, 1951

Parrish v. State, 139 Ala. 16 , 36 So. 1012 ; Braham v. State, 143 Ala. 28 , 38 So. 919 ; Odom v. State, 172 Ala. 383 , 55 So. 820 ; George v. State, 240 Ala. 632 , 200 So. 602 ; Jones v. … Brown from doctors at Bryce Hospital. These communications fall within the hearsay category and were properly excluded. Fondren v. State, 204 Ala. 451 , 86 So. 71 .

Bevels v. State

38 Ala. App. 198 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1955

Moody v. State, 23 Ala. App. 431 , 126 So. 495 ; Brown v. State, 32 Ala.App. 406 , 26 So.2d 536 .

State v. Blackwell

16 Ala. App. 500 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1918

SAMFORD, J. [1] A part of section one of this act has already been declared unconstitutional (Board of Revenue, etc., v. … Board of Revenue, etc., v. State ex rel. Campbell, 163 Ala. 441 , 50 South. 972 , and authorities there cited. It follows, therefore, that the judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Worley

12 Ala. App. 494 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1914

Co. v. Brazier, 10 Ala. App. 308 , 65 South. 95 , and cases there cited. … There was evidence of the due transmission of the mes: sage; that during the morning after it was sent it was carried by the defendant’s messenger to the address stated in it, which was a hotel or boarding house, and, the

Gibson v. State

22 Ala. App. 563 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1928

Brown v. State, 108 Ala. 18 , 18 So. 811 . … Scott v. Scott, 215 Ala. 684 , 112 So. 218 . The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Case v. O'Shields

30 Ala. App. 254 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 1941

Co. v. Kemp, ante, p. 138, 1 So.2d 760 . What this court said in Alabama Power Co. v. … Orman v. Scharnagel, 210 Ala. 381 , 98 So. 123 ; Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 25 Ala.App. 588 , 151 So. 604 ; Norwood Hospital v. Brown, 219 Ala. 445 , 122 So. 411 .

Bank of Mobile v. Lewis

16 Ala. App. 605 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1918

Cochran v. … Hall & Brown W. Mach. Co. v. Haley Furniture & Mfg. Co. et al., 174 Ala. 190 , 56 South. 726 , L. R. A. 1918B, 924; Bennett, Adm’x, v. McKee, 144 Ala. 601 , 38 South. 129 ; Ivey et al. v.

Nix v. State

27 Ala. App. 388 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1937

Bloodsworth v. State, 21 Ala.App. 275 , 107 So. 321 . … Objections and exceptions were reserved to the action of the court in refusing to exclude from the testimony of a State’s witness the following: “They just continued to talk, and Brother Brown stopped about twice and asked

Fletcher v. State

12 Ala. App. 216 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1915

BROWN, J. The only evidence offered ivas that in behalf of the state and consisting of the testimony of two witnesses. … Co. v. Seaborn, supra; Acklen v. Hickman, 63 Ala. 498 , 35 Am. Rep. 54 ; Council v. Mayhew, 172 Ala. 295 , 55 South. 317 .

City of Jasper v. Barton

1 Ala. App. 472 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1911

—City of Austin v. Ilitz, 72 Tex. 391 , 9 S. W. 884 ; Poole v. Jackson, 93 Tenn. 62 , 23 S. W. 57 ; Evans v. Iowa City, 125 Iowa, 202 , 100 N. W. 1112 . … It is enough if the board i,s fairly informed of the nature and amount of the claim, so that it can act intelligently in the investigation and allowance or rejection of the same.” —Newman v.

Farley v. State

34 Ala. App. 54 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1948

This aside, the charge was approved in Mizell v. State, 184 Ala. 16 , 63 So. 1000 . We had this identical charge with the correct word used in Brown v. State, Ala.App., 31 So.2d 670 . … Brown v. State, 249 Ala. 5 , 31 So.2d 681 . The refusal of charge number 20 does not constitute error. It is not predicated on the evidence in the case. Rikard v. State, 209 Ala. 480 , 96 So. 412 ; Edwards v.

Rogers v. Whittle

15 Ala. App. 550 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1917

BROWN, J. (1-3) The gist of the action of detinue is the wrongful detention of the property of the plaintiff by the defendant ; and to entitle the plaintiff to recover he must not only show *552 general or special property … Co. v.

Brock v. State

17 Ala. App. 94 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1919

A majority of the court, BROWN, P. … State, 100 Ala. 19, 22 , 14 South. 362 ; Rountree v. State, 58 Ala. 381 ; McMullen v. State, 53 Ala. 531 .

National Life Ins. Co. of America v. Hedgecoth

16 Ala. App. 272 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1917

BROWN, P. J. … Co. v. Adams, 195 Ala. 147 , 70 South. 119 ; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v.

Donald v. State

24 Ala. App. 251 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1931

This charge, which is an exact copy Of charge “4” dealt with in the opinion in the case of Walker v. State, 220. … Justice Brown in the opinion which he wrote for the Supreme Court in the case of Walker v.

Naugher v. State

6 Ala. App. 3 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1912

. — McEwen v. State, 152 Ala. 38, 42 , 44 South. 619 . See, also, Johnson v. State, 169 Ala. 10 , 53 South. 769 ; Heninburg v. State, 151 Ala. 26 , 43 South. 959 ; Brown v. … Charge A differs from the charges of a similar character passed on in the cases of Hammond v. State, 147 Ala. 79 , 41 South. 761 , Jackson v. State, 5 Ala. App. 306 , 57 South. 594 , and Burkett v.

Woods v. State

38 Ala. App. 582 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1956

Moomaw v. United States, 5 Cir., 220 F.2d 589 ; Young v. United States, 5 Cir., 1938, 97 F.2d 200 , 117 A.L.R. 316 ; State v. Thorne, 43 Wash.2d 47 , 260 P.2d 331 ; Gillaspy v. … In State v.

Jordan v. State

16 Ala. App. 51 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1917

BROWN, P. J. [1] The record of the indictment and judgment of the law and equity court in the case of State v. … Williams v. State, 68 Ala. 551 ; Smith v.

United Security Life Insurance Company v. Sikes

40 Ala. App. 677 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 10, 1960

The policy issued March 15, 1956, provides benefits of $8 “Maximum Daily Hospital Board and Room Expense.” … Plaintiff testified the defendant had paid the amount claimed for room and board for both periods of hospitalization, and had paid $25 to Dr. Grisamore.

Roden v. State

15 Ala. App. 133 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

BROWN, J. (1, 2) This is the second appeal in this case (Roden v. State, 13 Ala. App. 105 , 69 South. 366 ). The bill of exceptions does not show positively whether Dr. … . — Cross v. State, 68 Ala. 476 ; City of Tuscaloosa v. Hill, 14 Ala.