Case law

Bertalsen v. State

20 Ala. App. 539 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1925

Abrams v. State, 17 Ala. App. 379 , 84 So. 862 ; Jimmerson v. State, 17 Ala. App. 552 , 86 So. 153 ; Lyles v. State, 18 Ala. App. 62 , 88 So. 375 ; Tapscott v. State, 18 Ala. App. 67 , 88 So. 376 ; Brown v. … App. 275 , 90 So. 278 ; Martin v. State, 18 Ala. App. 303 , 92 So. 37 ; Burnett v. State, 18 Ala. App. 318 , 91 So. 893 ; Adams v. State, 18 Ala. App. 524 , 93 So. 292 ; Mar *540 shall v. State, 18 Ala.

Cook v. Standard Oil Co.

15 Ala. App. 448 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1916

BROWN, J. … Co. v.

Shine v. State

44 Ala. App. 171 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1967

Brown v. State, 109 Ala. 70 , 20 So. 103 ; Welch v. State, 28 Ala.App. 273 , 183 So. 879 ; Catrett v. State, 31 Ala.App. 326 , 16 So.2d 725 , cert. den. 245 Ala. 336 , 16 So.2d 727 . … It is stated in Brown v.

Mitchell v. State

32 Ala. App. 467 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1945

However, as well stated in State v. … Holt v. State, 16 Ala. App. 399 , 78 So. 315 ; Mastoras v. State, 28 Ala. App. 123 , 180 So. 113 ; Allen v. State, 30 Ala. App. 147 , 2 So.2d 320 .

Owens v. State

25 Ala. App. 173 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1932

Brown v. State, 141 Ala. 80 , 37 So. 408 . We discover, nowhere, prejudicial error, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.

Kelly v. State

15 Ala. App. 63 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

*64 BROWN, J. — The appéllant was tried under an indictment charging the offense of assault with intent to murder, and was convicted of an .assault with a weapon. … . — Reynolds v. State, 196 Ala. 586 , 72 South. 20 ; McClellan v. State, 117 Ala. 140 , 23 South. 653 ; Parham v. State, 147 Ala. 57 , 42 South. 1 ; Ala. Steel & Wire Co. v. Griffin, 149 Ala. 423 , 42 South. 1034 .

Farrell v. Betts & Betts

16 Ala. App. 668 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1918

BROWN, P. … Wood v. Brewer, 66 Ala. 570 ; A. G. S. v. Hill, 76 Ala. 303 ; McFarland v.

Tillison v. State

32 Ala. App. 397 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 14, 1946

Lovett v. State, 30 Ala.App. 334 , 6 So.2d 437 , certiorari denied 242 Ala. 356 , 6 So.2d 441 ; Lovett v. State, 31 Ala.App. 210 , 14 So.2d 837 , certiorari denied 244 Ala. 601 , 14 So.2d 838 . … Neither was appellant permitted by license from the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to sell whiskey at this establishment.

Speagle v. United States Steel Corporation

39 Ala. App. 559 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1958

See also annotation in 30 A.L.R.2d 366 ; Battaglia v. Board of Review, 14 N.J.Super. 24 , 81 A.2d 186 ; Grobe v. Board of Review, 409 Ill. 576 , 101 N.E.2d 95 ; Allen v. … Maryland Employment Security Board, 206 Md. 316 , 111 A.2d 645 ; Shand v. California Employment Stabilization Comm., 124 Cal.App.2d 54 , 268 P.2d 193 ; Conon v.

Leonard v. State

18 Ala. App. 427 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1922

Orr v. State, 107 Ala. 35 , 18 South. 142 ; Bowen v. State, 106 Ala. 178 , 17 South. 335 . The demurrers to this indictment were properly overruled. … The witness Brown was clearly qualified to testify as to tbe finger prints of defendant.

Ayers v. Barbour

19 Ala. App. 470 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1923

Smith v. Atlanta Guano Co., 132 Ala. 586 , 31 South. 490 ; Winkler Brokerage Co. v. Courson, 160 Ala. 374 , 49 South. 341 ; Roddam v. Brown et al., 201 Ala. 109 . 77 South. 403 . … Murphy v. Wood, 103 Ala. 638 , 16 South. 22 ; Gunter v. Mason, 125 Ala. 644 , 27 South. 843 ; Milazzo v.

Edwards v. State

42 Ala. App. 307 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1964

Lawson v. State, 42 Ala.App. 172 , 157 So.2d 226 ; Brown v. State, post p. 429, 167 So.2d 281 (Ms., 7 Div. 739 ). The State failed to show the search was made within the legal hours. Under Weldon v.

Southern Life Health Ins. Co. v. Davis

33 Ala. App. 467 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1948

Brown-Service Ins. Co. v. Wright, 32 Ala.App. 578 , 28 So.2d 318 ; Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. Newell, 223 Ala. 401 , 137 So. 16 ; Independent Life Ins. Co. v. Seale, 219 Ala. 197 , 121 So. 714 ; Liberty Nat. Life Ins. … Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Mann, 28 Ala.App. 425 , 186 So. 583 , certiorari denied 237 Ala. 253 , 186 So. 586 ; Brown-Service Ins. Co. v. Wright, supra.

Maxwell v. State

16 Ala. App. 446 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1918

BROWN, P. J. The appellant’s contention here is that the trial court erred in refusing the affirmative charge requested by him in writing. … Diffey v. State, 86 Ala. 66 , 5 South. 576 ; Nicholas v. State, 4 Ala. App. 115 , 58 South. 681 ; Johnson v. State, 11 Ala. App. 301 , 66 South. 875 . Affirmed.

Jefferson County v. Busby

25 Ala. App. 449 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1933

J., and BOULDIN, BROWN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur, while GARDNER and THOMAS, JJ., dissent. For a full ■ discussion of the question, reference is here made to Jefferson County v.

Etheridge v. State

44 Ala. App. 323 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1968

In Wilson v. … Wilson v. State, supra; Schmerber v. State of California, supra. See also Maxwell v. Stephens, 229 F. Supp. 205 , affd.

Shirey v. State

21 Ala. App. 626 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1927

Harrison v. State, 37 Ala. 154 ; Brown v. State, 46 Ala. 175 ; Forman v. State, 190 Ala. 22 , 67 So. 583 .

Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. Marshall

17 Ala. App. 32 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1918

BROWN, P. J. … W. v. McHenry, 197 Ala. 541 , 73 South. 97 . [3] This contention is not sustained.

Lowe & Samford Gro. Co. v. Adamson

12 Ala. App. 541 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1915

BROWN, J. … —Fields v. Karter, 121 Ala. 329 , 25 South. 800 ; Shriner v. Craft, 166 Ala. 150 , 51 South. 884 , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 450, 139 Am. St. Rep. 19 ; McAnally v.

Burney v. State

5 Ala. App. 316 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 1912

The complaint was sufficient to support a conviction, and the motion in arrest of judgment was properly overruled. — Brazleton v. State, supra; Rhodes v. King, 52 Ala. 272 ; Bell v. State, 75 Ala. 25 ; Brown v. … State, 63 Ala. 97 ; Williams v. State, 88 Ala. 80, 7 South. 101 . The court’s action in overruling the motion for a new trial is not revisable here. — Sanders v. State, 2 Ala. App. 13 , 56 South. 69 ; Ferguson v.