Case law

Berland v. City of Birmingham

36 Ala. App. 488 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1952

Brown, who prosecutes for the City of Birmingham, and also came the defendant in his own proper person and by attorney, and the City of Birmingham files written Complaint in this cause, and the defendant files plea of autrefois … Coburn v. State, 151 Ala. 100 , 44 So. 58 ; Carter v. State, 21 Ala.App. 406 , 108 So. 642 ; Evans v. State, 24 Ala.App. 390 , 135 So. 647 .

Little v. State

18 Ala. App. 98 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1921

Phillips v. State, 161 Ala. 60 , 49 South. 794 ; Phillips v. State, 170 Ala. 5 , 54 South. 111 . The extent of the injury was also relevant, as tending to prove the intent of the assault. Brown v. … State, 142 Ala. 294 , 38 South. 268 ; Meredith v. State. 60 Ala. 441 ; Jackson v. State, 94 Ala. 94 , 10 South. 509 .

Dunaway & Lambert v. Stickney

13 Ala. App. 645 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1915

BROWN, J. … —Stickney v. Dunaway & Lambert, 169 Ala. 464 , 53 South. 770 ; Pantaze v. West, 7 Ala. App. 599 , 61 South. 42 ; Argo v. Sylacauga Mercantile Co., 12 Ala. App. 442 , 68 South. 534 .

Morrow v. State

39 Ala. App. 204 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1957

There was no error in the trial court’s ruling, Hughes v. State, 22 Ala.App. 344 , 115 So. 697 ; Griffin v. State, 28 Ala.App. 581 , 109 So. 289 . … State, 52 Ala. 405 ), and the Charybdis of the holding of Brown, J., in McKinnon v.

Steel v. State

35 Ala. App. 163 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1950

Rogers v. State, Ala.App., 42 So.2d 642 ; 1 Yates v. State, 245 Ala. 490 , 17 So.2d 777 ; Brown v. State, 206 Ala. 546 , 90 So. 278 . … See our case of Coats v. State, 34 Ala.App. 577 , 42 So.2d 591 ; certiorari denied, 252 Ala. 666 , 42 So.2d 593 . Affirmed. 34 Ala.App. 617 .

Williams v. State

37 Ala. App. 572 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1954

We had this identical question before us for review in the case of Gooch v. State, 33 Ala.App. 221 , 31 So.2d 779 . We certified the following questions to the Supreme Court; “1. … Mehaffey v. State, 16 Ala.App. 99 , 75 So. 647 ; Brown v. State, 32 Ala.App. 246 , 24 So.2d 450 .

Murphy v. Coleman

9 Ala. App. 625 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1913

. — Thomason v. Gray, 82 Ala. 291 , 3 South. 38 ; Morris v. McClellan, 154 Ala. 639 , 45 South. 641 , 16 Ann. Cas. 305; Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Coleman (Sup.) 61 South. 890 . … v.

State ex rel. King v. Pearce

14 Ala. App. 628 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1916

BROWN, J. Section 2496 of the Code provides: “All actions on contracts, express or implied; all personal actions, except for injuries to the reputation, survive in favor of and against the personal representative.” … —Rowland & Heifner v. Ladiga’s Heirs, 21 Ala. 9 ; Jordan v. Abercrombie, 15 Ala. 580; Leatherwood, et al. v. Sullivan, et al., Ex’rs, 81 Ala. 458 , 1 South. 718 ; Espalla v.

Broadus v. Lindsey

17 Ala. App. 342 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1919

BROWN, P. J. [1, 2] The principles of law governing the case as presented by count A are clearly stated in Harton v. Belcher, 195 Ala. 186 , 70 South. 141 , and Berry v. Wooddy, 16 Ala. App. 348 , 77 South. 942 . … Gambill v. Fox Typewriter Co., 190 Ala. 36 , 66 South. 655 . [8 ] There was evidence which, if believed, justified the findings of the trial court. Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403 , 72 South. 52 ; Pinkard v.

Hubbard v. State

13 Ala. App. 250 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1915

BROWN, J. (1) Larceny is the felonious taking and carrying away of the personal property of another, with the intent to convert it to the use of the taker or deprive the owner thereof. —Higgs v. … —Fort v.

Pate v. Baker

15 Ala. App. 234 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1916

BROWN, J. (1) The judgment in this case was rendered on the 6th day of December, 1915, and the indorsement of the *235 trial judge on the bill of exceptions shows that it was not presented until the 7th day of March, 1916 … Co., 184 Ala. 598 , 64 South. 69 ; Harper v. State, 13 Ala.

Ogles v. State

15 Ala. App. 111 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

. — Hafley v. State, 8 Ala. App. 378, 382 , 62 South. 319 ; Town of Athens v. Miller, 190 Ala. 88 , 66 South. 702 . See, also, Ex parte Brown, infra, 72 South. 772 . … .” — See, also, Strange v. State, 5 Ala. App. 164 , 59 South. 691 ; Woodward v. State, 5 Ala. App. 202 , 59 South. 688 ; Warrick v. State, 8 Ala. App. 391 , 62 South. 342 .

Consolidated Mercantile Co. v. Warren

15 Ala. App. 623 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1917

BROWN, P. J. (8) The burden is on the appellant to show error.- — Smith v. State, 183 Ala. 10 , 62 South. 864 . … .— Carand v.

Thacker v. City of Selma

16 Ala. App. 345 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1918

BROWN, P. J. It appears from the record in this case that Hon. Joseph B. … Petty v. Dill, 53 Ala. 641 ; Edinburgh L. & M. Co. v. Canterbury, 169 Ala. 444 , 53 South. 823 ; King v. Hill, 163 Ala. 423 , 51 South. 15 ; Smith v. State, 166 *346 Ala. 26, 52 South. 396 ; Rainey v.

O'Brien v. State

29 Ala. App. 39 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 9, 1939

State, 104 Ala. 43 , 16 So. 155 ; Hendrix v. State, 17 Ala. App. 116 , 82 So. 564 ; Pruitt v. State, 21 Ala. App. 113 , 105 So. 429 ; Mitchell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 194 , 122 So. 601 ; Brown v. State, 25 Ala. … App. 117 , 141 So. 725 ; Bauer v. State, 25 Ala. App. 355 , 146 So. 539 ; Pollock v. State, 19 Ala. App. 156 , 97 So. 237 . Certiorari denied, Pollock v. State, 210 Ala. 69 , 97 So. 240 .

Fetner v. State

22 Ala. App. 128 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1927

Neely v. State, 20 Ala. App. 538 , 103 So. 386 . … Lancaster v. State, 21 Ala. App. 140 , 106 So. 609 . Refused charges 8 and 10 should have been given as requested. Code 1923, § 9509; Stevens v. State, 6 Ala. App. 6 , 60 So. 459 ; Brown v.

McCarty v. State

22 Ala. App. 62 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1927

Gaston v. State, 161 Ala. *63 37, 49 So. 876 ; Griffin v. State, 165 Ala. 29 , 50 So. 962 ; Cox v. State, 19 Ala. App. 205 , 96 So. 83 . … Chaney v. State, 178 Ala. 44 , 59 So. 604 . Refused charge 8 was held to be good, and its refusal to be error, in Burton’s Case, 107 Ala. 108 , 18 So. 284 ; Brown v. State, 108 Ala. 18 , 18 So. 811 ; Pickens v.

Blevins v. State

17 Ala. App. 562 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1920

Tbe rulings of tbe court on tbe venire and organization of tbe jury in this case were identical with the rulings in the case of the co-defendant, Richard, alias Rich Blevins v. … State (Sup.) 85 South. 817 , 1 and notwithstanding the strong, cogent, and convincing opinion rendered by Justice Sayre and concurred in by Justice Brown, the Supreme Court has decided that no error appears in the rulings

Dean v. State

16 Ala. App. 367 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1918

BROWN, P. J. (dissenting). It is well settled that when there is any evidence at all haring even the slightest tendency to prove the corpus delicti, the case is for the jury. Daniels v. State, 12 Ala.

Jones v. State

20 Ala. App. 96 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 1924

Gilmore v. State, 99 Ala. 154 , 13 South. 536 (charge 10); Griffin v. State, 150 Ala. 49 , 43 South. 197 (charge 19); Odom v. State, 172 Ala. 383 , 55 South. 820 (charge 7); Brown v. … Befused charge L is an exact copy of charge 8, which was approved in Estes v. State, 18 Ala. App. 606 , 93 South. 217 . It has also been approved in the following decisions: Mills v. State, 1 Ala.