Case law

Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. Hawes

31 Ala. App. 564 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1944

Co. v. … Wood v. Hacker, 23 Ala.App. 12 , 121 So. 437 ; American Ry. Express Co. v. Henderson, 214 Ala. 268 , 107 So. 746 ; McGahey v. Albritton, 214 Ala. 279 , 107 So. 751 ; Chevrolet Motor Co. v.

Flott v. State

24 Ala. App. 584 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1932

Bryant v. State, 116 Ala. 445 , 23 So. 40 . There was at least a scintilla of evidence pointing to the guilt of appellant as charged — if there was not more. … Norwood Hospital v. Brown, 219 Ala. 445 , 122 So. 411 . The other written charges requested by appellant, and refused, have each been examined.

Woolum v. State

16 Ala. App. 700 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 28, 1918

BROWN, P. J. The questions presented by this appeal were treated by this court and adjudged . against appellant’s contention .in State v.

Allen v. Town of Thomaston

17 Ala. App. 16 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1919

BROWN, P. J. On the authority of Miles v. City of Montgomery, 8I South. 351, 2 the judgment of the court on the demurrers to the complaint is erroneous, and must be reversed. … App. 592 , 80 South. 166 ; Glenn v. City of Prattville, 14 Ala. App. 621 , 71 South. 75 . Reversed and remanded. 2 Ante, p. 15.

Williams v. State

16 Ala. App. 111 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 29, 1917

BROWN, P. … See Moore v. State, 12 Ala. App. 243 , 67 South. 789 .

Norman v. State

39 Ala. App. 291 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1957

Hence, the motion of the Attorney General to strike the record and dismiss the appeal is proper, Aaron v. State, supra. See also Duke v. State, 264 Ala. 624 , 89 So.2d 102 ; Lane v. … State, 38 Ala.App. 487 , 87 So.2d 668 ; King v. State, ante, p. 167, 98 So.2d 443 ; Lyons v. State, 38 Ala.App. 639 , 91 So.2d 520 ; Brown v. State, 38 Ala.App. 638 , 91 So.2d 514 . Record stricken. Appeal dismissed.

Kelly v. State

16 Ala. App. 446 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1918

BROWN, P. J. The only question presented in this case is one of fact. … Williams v. State, ante, p. 329, 77 South. 923 . Affirmed.

Floyd v. Lamar

13 Ala. App. 504 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1915

BROWN, J. (1) This court cannot review the action of a trial court in proceeding to judgment after due service of process, where the judgment is not premature, in the absence of a bill of exceptions properly presenting the … —Patterson & Hinson, v. Burnett, 6 Ala. 884 ; Smith v. Redus, 9 Ala. 101 , 44 Am. Dec. 429 ; *506 Kennedy v. Young, 25 Ala. 564 ; Lamkin v. Dudley, 34 Ala. 117 .

Kirk v. State

14 Ala. App. 44 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1916

BROWN, J. (1) The court takes judicial notice that Robt. S. … Rep. 65 ; McCarver v. Herzberg, 120 Ala. 524 , 25 South. 3 ; Carey v. State, 76 Ala. 78 ; Sandlin v.

Bell v. State

16 Ala. App. 100 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 29, 1917

BROWN, P. … Mehaffey v. State, ante, p. 99, 75 South. 647 ; *101 State v. Nix, 165 Ala. 126 , 51 South. 754 ; Raisler v. State, 55 Ala. 64 ; Emmonds v. State, 87 Ala. 12 , 6 South. 54 ; Noah v. State, 15 Ala.

Dunaway & Lambert v. Stickney

13 Ala. App. 645 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1915

BROWN, J. … —Stickney v. Dunaway & Lambert, 169 Ala. 464 , 53 South. 770 ; Pantaze v. West, 7 Ala. App. 599 , 61 South. 42 ; Argo v. Sylacauga Mercantile Co., 12 Ala. App. 442 , 68 South. 534 .

Steel v. State

35 Ala. App. 163 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1950

Rogers v. State, Ala.App., 42 So.2d 642 ; 1 Yates v. State, 245 Ala. 490 , 17 So.2d 777 ; Brown v. State, 206 Ala. 546 , 90 So. 278 . … See our case of Coats v. State, 34 Ala.App. 577 , 42 So.2d 591 ; certiorari denied, 252 Ala. 666 , 42 So.2d 593 . Affirmed. 34 Ala.App. 617 .

Upshaw v. State

16 Ala. App. 678 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1919

BROWN, P. J. [1] The testimony of the witness Yates clearly tends to prove the corpus delicti, and the evidence of this witness as to the confession of the defendant was properly admitted. Daniels v. State, 12 Ala. … App. 119 , 68 South. 499 ; Simmons v.

Norwood v. State

15 Ala. App. 602 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1917

BROWN, P. J. This is an appeal on the record without a bill of exceptions. The indictment was preferred at a special term of the circuit court, and the order convening the court is not made a part of the record. … . — Keith v. State, infra, 129, 72 South. 602 . Affirmed.

State v. Estate of Crocker

38 Ala. App. 306 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1955

State Personnel Board, 53 Cal.App.2d 222 , 127 P.2d 634 ; State Land Board v. Lee, 84 Or. 431 , 165 P. 372 ; Horton v. Jones, 110 Kan. 540 , 204 P. 1001 ; State v. … State v. Evans, supra; Hill v. State, supra. See 34 A.L.R.2d 1003 ; Donnally v. Montgomery County Welfare Board, supra.

Murphy v. Coleman

9 Ala. App. 625 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1913

. — Thomason v. Gray, 82 Ala. 291 , 3 South. 38 ; Morris v. McClellan, 154 Ala. 639 , 45 South. 641 , 16 Ann. Cas. 305; Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Coleman (Sup.) 61 South. 890 . … v.

Draughon's Business College v. Battles

35 Ala. App. 587 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1951

Jones v. State, 236 Ala. 30 , 182 So. 404 ; Ross v. Washington, 233 Ala. 292 , 171 So. 893 ; Jackson v. State, 33 Ala.App. 42 , 31 So.2d 514 ; Moore v. State, Ala.App., 44 So.2d 789 . … Mobley v. New York Life Ins. Co., 295 U.S. 632 , 55 S.Ct. 876, 878 , 99 A.L.R. 1166 . See also, Roehm v. Horst, 178 U.S. 1 , 20 S.Ct. 780 , 44 L.Ed. 953 ; Smoot v. U. S., 15 Wall. 36 , 21 L.Ed. 107 ; Dingley v.

Broadus v. Lindsey

17 Ala. App. 342 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1919

BROWN, P. J. [1, 2] The principles of law governing the case as presented by count A are clearly stated in Harton v. Belcher, 195 Ala. 186 , 70 South. 141 , and Berry v. Wooddy, 16 Ala. App. 348 , 77 South. 942 . … Gambill v. Fox Typewriter Co., 190 Ala. 36 , 66 South. 655 . [8 ] There was evidence which, if believed, justified the findings of the trial court. Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403 , 72 South. 52 ; Pinkard v.

Thomas v. Winter Const. Co.

23 Ala. App. 550 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1930

See, also, the case of Brown v. … Brown, 213 Ala. 339 , 105 So. 171 , the trial'court refused to set aside the default judgment, and it was held that this order of the court was not appealable but the remedy was by mandamus. In the case of Ingram v.

McCarty v. State

22 Ala. App. 62 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1927

Gaston v. State, 161 Ala. *63 37, 49 So. 876 ; Griffin v. State, 165 Ala. 29 , 50 So. 962 ; Cox v. State, 19 Ala. App. 205 , 96 So. 83 . … Chaney v. State, 178 Ala. 44 , 59 So. 604 . Refused charge 8 was held to be good, and its refusal to be error, in Burton’s Case, 107 Ala. 108 , 18 So. 284 ; Brown v. State, 108 Ala. 18 , 18 So. 811 ; Pickens v.