Case law

Cleckler v. Childress

16 Ala. App. 562 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1918

BROWN, P. … Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403 , 72 South. 52 ; Finney v. Studebaker, 196 Ala. 422 , 72 South. 54 . Affirmed. 1 Ante, p. 231.

Peabody School Furniture Co. v. Whitman

6 Ala. App. 182 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1912

The note sued upon is signed “Board •of Trustees,” and underneath these words are the signatures “E. F. Whitman,” followed by the word “Chairman,” and “Q-. .M. E. Mann,” followed by the abbreviation “Secy.” … Fields et al., 124 Ala. 535 , 26 South. 981 ; Ware Murphy & Co. v. Morgan & Duncan, 67 Ala. 461 ; Oldacre v. Stuart, 122 Ala. 405 , 25 South. 38 ; Briel v. Exchange Nat. Bank. 172 Ala. 475 , 55 South. 808 .

Farmer v. State Ex Rel. Killcrease

28 Ala. App. 398 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1938

In the case of Bragg v. … Williamson v. State, 16 Ala. App. 392 , 78 So. 308 . *400 As was stated in Fraser v.

Wright v. State

40 Ala. App. 683 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1960

Brown v. State, 30 Ala.App. 339 , 7 So.2d 24 . Otherwise an accused would not be sufficiently informed to enable him to prepare his defense. … Crow v.

Cauley v. State

14 Ala. App. 133 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1916

BROWN, J. (1, 2) It is here urged that the court erroneously admitted the inculpatory statement imputed to the defendant by the witness Lee in response to the solicitor’s question, “After you lost the cow, did he say anything … —Fortner v. State, 12 Ala. App. 180 , 67 South. 720 ; Whatley v. State, 144 Ala. 75 , 39 South. 1014 ; Price v. State, 117 Ala. 113 , 23 South. 691 ; Gilmore v. State, 126 Ala. 20 , 28 South. 595 .

King v. Dearing-Orman Mercantile Co.

17 Ala. App. 83 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1919

BROWN, P. J. … Norwood v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 149 Ala. 151 , 42 South. 683 ; Grantham v. State; 3 Ala. App. 168 , 57 South. 1025 ; Patton v. State, 160 Ala. 111 , 49 South. 809 ; Hodo v. State, 156 Ala. 43 , 47 South. 134 ; Barber v.

Mahoney v. State

16 Ala. App. 559 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1918

BROWN, P. J. The ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Kreutner v. State, 80 South. 125 , necessitates a reversal of the judgment in this case. Reversed and remanded.

State Ex Rel. Farmer v. Haas

29 Ala. App. 169 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1940

Section 6748 of the Code deals with the general powers and duties of boards of revenue and like boards of the several counties of the State. … Ballentyne v. Wickersham, 75 Ala. 533 ; Houston County Board of Revenue v. Poyner, 236 Ala. 384 , 182 So. 455 .

State v. Kuykendall

15 Ala. App. 694 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1916

Brown, J. The appeal is dismissed on the authority of State v. Berkstresser, 137 Ala. 109 , 34 South. 686 , holding that the statute does not authorize an appeal in this case.

Killen v. State

16 Ala. App. 31 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1917

BROWN, P. J. [1] The particulars of the previous difficulty occurring at midnight on the night before the homicide and the fact of deceased’s intoxication at that time were not material. Allsup v. … Brewer v. State, 160 Ala. 66 , 49 South. 336 ; Langham v. State, 12 Ala. App. 46 , 68 South. 504 .

Bryant v. State

31 Ala. App. 355 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1944

Chaney v. State, 29 Ala.App. 225 , 194 So. 700 ; Brown v. State, 30 Ala.App. 5 , 200 So. 637 , certiorari denied, 240 Ala. 648 , 200 So. 640 . … This evidence was material to the issue of intent to kill (Bodine v. State, 18 Ala.App. 514 , 93 So. 264 ), and has been held relevant as of the res gestae of the offense (Phillips v.

Peoples v. State

17 Ala. App. 696 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 20, 1919

BROWN, P. J. This is the companion to the case of George Peoples v. State, 81 South. 692 , 1 and on the authority of that case the bill of exceptions is stricken and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Shirley v. State

38 Ala. App. 104 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1954

his possession, a still or apparatus or appliance or some device or substitute therefor, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing or distilling prohibited liquors or beverages without authority of the Alcoholic Control Board … See Hardin v. State, 241 Ala. 151 , 3 So.2d 93 .

Little v. State

16 Ala. App. 493 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1918

The judgment is affirmed, upon authority of Carroll Little v. State, ante, p. 492, 79 South. 397 , present term, by Brown, P. J. Affirmed.

Swindle v. State Ex Rel. Pruitt

25 Ala. App. 166 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1932

Langham, 34 Ala. 311 ; Quartlebaum v. State, 79 Ala. 1 ; State ex rel. Wilkinson v. Lane, 181 Ala. 646 , 62 So. 31 ; Smith v. Stiles, Judge of Probate, 195 Ala. 107 , 70 So. 905 , Board of Revenue v. … App. 476 , 103 So. 71 ; State v. Blackwell, 36 Ala. App. 500 , 79 So. 198 . “Adverting to the statute of 1915, page 560, which was condemned in Board of Revenue, etc., v. State ex rel.

Wright v. McCullough

16 Ala. App. 575 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1918

BROWN, P. … Code 1907, § 6110; Rand v.

Roy v. State

24 Ala. App. 419 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1931

That she could not swear of her own knowledge that the next time she saw the boards, or saw some boards in Dr. … In Cross v.

Wilkerson v. State

12 Ala. App. 100 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1915

BROWN, J. … —Jacobi v. State, 133 Ala. 8 , 32 South. 158 ; Murdock v.

Smalley v. Bank of Albertville

15 Ala. App. 496 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1917

BROWN, J. In the complaint as originally filed, the plaintiff was styled, the “Bank of Arab, a corporation.” … On this showing the court properly allowed the plaintiff to amend the complaint by substituting the word “Albertville” for “Arab.” — McDonough v. Commercial State Bank, infra, 73 South. 754 .

Smitherman v. State

16 Ala. App. 423 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1918

BROWN, P. J. This is an appeal from the order of the court on motion to retax costs prosecuted under the provision of section 8684 of the Code of 1907, as amended by act approved March 4, 1911. … Williams v. State, 117 Ala. 199 . 23 South. 42 ; Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253 , 55 South. 1035 ; State v. Dodd, 9 Ala. App. 65 , 64 South. 169 ; Stadt v. City of Birmingham, 14 Ala.