Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersalactapp

2,210 results

1.11s

  • English v. State

    23 Ala. App. 336 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1929

    The defendant was charged with unlawfully and with malice aforethought killing one Elijah Brown, alias Lige Brown, by stabbing him with a knife, but without premeditation or deliberation. … For authorities see Baxley v. State, 18 Ala. App. 277 , 90 So. 434 . Befused charge 5 is held to be bad in Cooke v. State, 18 Ala. App. 416 , 93 So. 86 ; Edwards v. State, 205 Ala. 160 , 87 So. 179 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. State

    17 Ala. App. 28 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1919

    BROWN, P. … Pearson v. State, 13 Ala. App. 181 , 69 South. 845 ; Reynolds v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Weinstein v. Citizens Bank

    13 Ala. App. 552 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1915

    Eason, supra; Ladiga Sawmill Co. v. Smith, 78 Ala. 108 ; Shapard v. … —Tabor v. Peters, 74 Ala. 90 , 49 Am. Rep. 804 ; Brown v. Freeman, 79 Ala. 409 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Roszell v. State

    19 Ala. App. 462 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 1923

    Wiswall v. Gliddeu, 4 Ala. 357 ; Drinkard v. State, 20 Ala. 9 ; Harrall v. State, 26 Ala. 52 ; Brown v. Clements, 24 Ala. 354 ; Ex parte Remson, 31 Ala. 270 ; Glenn v. … Forrester v. Forrester, 39.Ala. 323; Ex parte Remson, 31 Ala. 270 ; Harrall v. State, 26 Ala. 52 ; Brown & Wife v. Clements, 24 Ala. 354 ; Drinkard v. State, 20 Ala. 9 ; Wiswall v. Glidden, 4 Ala. 357 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Harris v. State

    42 Ala. App. 264 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1964

    Lindsay v. State, 41 Ala.App. 85 , 125 So.2d 716 . We quote from Dodd v. … Wilks v. State, 21 Ala.App. 199 , 106 So. 681 ; Shields v. State, 104 Ala. 35 , 16 So. 85 , 53 Am.St.Rep. 17 ; Banks v. State, 18 Ala.App. 376 , 93 So. 293 , 24 A.L.R. 1359 , and numerous cases cited. Brewer v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. State

    16 Ala. App. 451 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1918

    BROWN, P. … Rash v. State, 61 Ala. 89 -93; Underhill’s Cr. Ev. § 312; 1 Greenl. Ev. 440; Pearce v. State, 14 Ala. App. 120 , 72 South. 213 . The testimony of the state’s witness, Hr. Lindsey, was within the rule.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Gamlin v. State

    19 Ala. App. 119 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1923

    Lowe v. State, 134 Ala. 154 , 32 South. 273 ; Wooster v. State, 55 Ala. 217 ; Ex parte State, In re Brown, etc., 197 Ala. 419 , 73 South. 35 . The plea of former jeopardy will not lie in a case of this character. U. … S. v. Lanza et al., 43 Sup. Ct. 141, 67 L. Ed. 314 ; Gilbert v. State, ante, p. 104, 95 South. 502 . There is no error in the record. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Birmingham Water Works Co. v. Keiley

    2 Ala. App. 629 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1911

    —Smith v. Birmingham Waterworks Co., supra; State ex rel. v. Birmingham Waterworks Co., 164 Ala. 586 , 51 South. 354 , 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 674 137 Am. St. Rep. 69 ; Brown v. … Co. v. Seed, 115 Ala. 670 , 22 South. 474 ; Mobile Furniture Co. v. Little 108 Ala. 399 , 19 South. 443 . 3. In the case of Lienkauf & Strauss v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Pierson v. State

    16 Ala. App. 197 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1917

    State v. McCarty, 5 Ala. App. 212 , 59 South. 543 ; Morgan’s Co. v. Board of Health, 118 U. S. 455 , 6 Sup. Ct. 3114, 30 L. Ed. 237 . … Glenn v. City of Prattville, 14 Ala. App. 621 , 71 South. 75 ; Bivins v. City of Montgomery, 13 Ala. App. 641 , 69 South. 224 ; Curlee v. State, ante, p. 62, 75 South. 268 ; Powell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stadt v. City of Birmingham

    14 Ala. App. 667 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1915

    Brown, J. Affirmed for want of assignment of error, on authority of Williams v. State, 117 Ala. 199 , 23 South. 42 , and Dreyfus v. City of Montgomery, 4 Ala. App. 270 , 58 South. 730 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gullatt v. State

    18 Ala. App. 21 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1920

    This, in effect, is the same thing; the certificate of qualification from the state board being the required license. … Fealy v. City of Birmingham, 15 Ala. App. 367 , 73 South. 296 . On the trial the state offered testimony sufficient to sustain a verdict of conviction as charged in the indictment, and closed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rikard v. State

    16 Ala. App. 401 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1918

    Co. v. Moore, 148 Ala. 115 , 42 South. 1024 . There was no error in the ruling of the court in sustaining the objection of the state to the questions propounded to said jurors Wood and Brown. … Co. v. Moore, supra, and cases cited.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McGovern v. State

    44 Ala. App. 197 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1967

    The case of Norris v. … If, as stated in Holcomb v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lawson v. State

    16 Ala. App. 174 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1917

    BROWN, P. J. … Co. v. Donaldson, 14 Ala. App. 160 , 68 South. 596 ; Bullington v. State, 13 Ala. App. 61 , 69 South. 319 ; Brand v. State, 13 Ala. App. 390 , 69 South. 379 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Town of Coffee Springs v. Glover

    10 Ala. App. 475 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1914

    board of education, by the county superintendent of education, as required by law.” … the corporate authority confers no right, and neither the making of the ultra vires contract nor the receiving of benefits under it estops the corporation from setting-up its invalidity.- — Cleveland School Furniture Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pickett v. State

    37 Ala. App. 410 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1953

    In Howard v. State, 172 Ala. 402 , 55 So. 255 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 990, the appellant had relied on a Utah case, State v. … Our court then pointed out that there were decisive distinctions between the case before it and the Brown case, one of the main distinctions being that the appellant had not testified in the Brown case but had in the case

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Collier v. State

    16 Ala. App. 425 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1918

    BROWN, P. J. [1] The indictment consists of one count which follows the form prescribed by the statute, and as repeatedly held, is sufficient to sustain a judgment of conviction, and is not subject to demurrer. … Code 1907, § 7161, p. 679, form 112; Newsum v. State, 10 Ala. App. 124 , 65 South. 87 ; Kimbell v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Randle v. Walker

    17 Ala. App. 211 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1919

    BROWN, P. J. This is an action of assumpsit by the appellee against the appellant, the complaint consisting of the common counts. … Austin v. Beall, 167 Ala. 426 , 52 South. 657 , Ann. Cas. 1912A, 510; Russell v. Gillmore, 54 Ill. 147 ; Bower v. Wells, Cowp. 818, 98 Eng.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kyle v. Wiggins

    20 Ala. App. 347 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1924

    Milan v. Masters, 207 Ala. 324 , 93 So. 14 . … Co. v. Morris, 65 Ala. 193 , headnote 2; Noble v. Mitchell, 100 Ala. 519 , 14 So. 581 , 25 L. R. A. 238; Faust v. Mayor, etc., 83 Ala. 279 , headnote 3, 3 So. 771 ; Wilkinson v. Stiles, 200 Ala. 279 , 76 So. 45 .”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Clopton v. State

    28 Ala. App. 533 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1939

    Skinner v. State, 87 Ala. 105 , 6 So. 399 ; Smith v. State, 23 Ala. 39 ; Rogers v. State, 16 Ala.App. 179 , 76 So. 416 . The judgment of the trial court is not sustained by the evidence. … O’Rear et al., 220 Ala. 219 , 124 So. 743 , was expressly overruled by the Supreme Court in Browne v. Giger, 221 Ala. 176 , 128 So. 174 ; and on the authority in the opinion of Browne v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.