Case law

Faust v. Baker

31 Ala. App. 152 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 11, 1943

Thompson v. Manufacturers’ Finance Acceptance Corp., 25 Ala.App. 70 , 150 So. 174 , supra; Bradberry v. State, 168 Ala. 141 , 53 So. 266 , 1 H.N.; Haden v. Brown, 22 Ala. 572 , 1 & 2 H.N’s.; Stein v. … Eason v. State, 22 Ala.App. 424 , 116 So. 409 , 3 H.N.; Browning v. Lockett, supra; Thompson v. Manufacturers’ Finance Corp. 2 H.N., supra; McRee v. Russell, 236 Ala. 506 , 183 So. 399 , 2 H.N.; Bradberry v.

Hopper v. Crocker

17 Ala. App. 372 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 11, 1919

J., in Teal et al. v. … As we have already said, this case is different from the cause of action stated in the Strouse v. Leipf Case, supra.

Blakeney v. State

31 Ala. App. 154 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1942

to Blakeney; that he thought the Brown women owned the cattle and was innocent of any wrongdoing when he impenned Ganguet's cattle. … Phelps v. State, supra; 36 C.J. 749, Sec. 48(b) and notes; 32 Am.Jur. 905, Sec. 19 and notes; People v. Frank, 176 Misc. 416 , 27 N.Y.S.2d 227 ; Marshall v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 561 , 2 S.W.2d 233 .

Perez v. State

34 Ala. App. 406 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 3, 1949

Peterson v. State, 17 Ala.App. 662 , 88 So. 49 ; Winchester v. State, 30 Ala.App. 26 , 200 So. 571 . It is clearly apparent that the State relied on circumstantial evidence for a conviction. … However, as Chief Justice Gardner observed in the case of DeSilvey v.

Vandiver v. State

37 Ala. App. 526 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1953

Frank Brown and Johnnie Jackson were out of the State at the time of the trial. … In Matthews v.

Joyner v. McMurphy

26 Ala. App. 549 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1935

Spafford v. Spafford, 199 Ala. 300 , 74 So. 354 , L.R.A. 1917D, 773 ; Winkles v. Powell, 173 Ala. 46 , 55 So. 536 . … Ponder v. Morris Brothers, 152 Ala. 531 , 44 So. 651 .

Jemison v. State

40 Ala. App. 581 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1960

paper sack in Jemison’s truck; and (3) some more in brown paper sacks in his house. … The following quotation from Herring v.

Love v. State

16 Ala. App. 44 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1917

BROWN, P. … Brown v. State, 142 Ala. 287 , 38 South. 268 ; Jackson v. State, 94 Ala. 89 , 10 South. 509 ; Meredith v. State, 60 Ala. 441 ; Wigmore’s Evidence, § 300.

Watson v. State

15 Ala. App. 39 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1916

. — Griffin v. State, 90 Ala. 596 , 8 South. 670 ; O’Rear v. … Evidence, § 80, p. 145; Browne v. United States, 145 Fed. 1 , 76 C. C. A. 31 .

Ex Parte Brown

15 Ala. App. 210 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

See Ex parte Brown , 198 Ala., 73 So. 999 .) … . — Town of Athens v. Miller , 190 Ala. 88 , 66 So. 702 ; Whatley v. State , 144 Ala. 74 , 39 So. 1014 ; Ashford v.

York v. State

43 Ala. App. 54 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1964

State, 42 Ala.App. 172 , 157 So.2d 226 ; Brown v. State, 42 Ala.App. 429 , 167 So. 2d 281 . … After the trial was had in York’s case, our Supreme Court, in Brown v.

Maddox v. City of Birmingham

36 Ala. App. 9 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1950

Conner v. Foregger, 242 Ala. 275 , 7 So.2d 856 ; Moore v. Cruit, 238 Ala. 414 , 191 So. 252 ; Evans v. State, 17 Ala.App. 141 , 82 So. 625 ; Emergency Aid Life Ass’n v. Gamble, 34 Ala.App. 377 , 40 So.2d 887 . … Brown: (Laughing) “The Court: It might -be inquiring into a third person’s mental operation.” (2) “Q. How long háve you been fooling with the policy racket,-Troupe? “Mr.

Messer v. State

24 Ala. App. 360 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1931

We have recently dealt with the principal question apparent on this record, in the case of Eddie Brown Armstrong v. State, ante, p. 334, 134 So. 897 . … Eddie Brown Armstrong v. State, supra. Our decision, if technical, seems compulsory (Code 1923, § 7318, supra), though we might say in its defense that any other would, obviously, lead to costly confusion.

Tarwater v. State

16 Ala. App. 140 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 15, 1917

It was said in Brown v. … Brown v. State, supra.

Home Ins. Co. v. Cobbs

20 Ala. App. 491 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1925

The case was here on former appeal when the constitutionality of the act was passed upon (Cobbs, Treasurer, v. Home Insurance Co., 18 Ala. … L. (2d Ed.) § 632; Crowder v. Fletcher, 80 Ala. 219 .

Hood v. Jenkins

16 Ala. App. 180 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1917

Code 1907, § 3791; Miller v. Johnson, 189 Ala. 354 , 66 South. 486 ; Wertheimer Bag Co. v. Hill, 14 Ala. App. 623 , 71 South. 618 ; Tabor v. Peters, 74 Ala. 90 , 49 Am. … Brown v. Freeman, 79 Ala. 406 .

Wideman v. State

20 Ala. App. 422 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1924

It was sufficient to aver that he treated or offered to treat diseases of human beings without first having obtained a license from the state board of medical examiners. Thompson v. State, 19 Ala. … The state board of medical examiners has been designated by law to conduct such examinations and issue certificates of qualification. Code 1907, §§ 1626-1645; Williamson v. State, 16 Ala.

Roseberry v. State

20 Ala. App. 450 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1924

boards. … The authority existing in the abolished boards was conferred upon the board established by the act and' provision made for the exercise of that jurisdiction by the new board. See, also, Hawkins, Treas., v.

Summers v. State

31 Ala. App. 264 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1943

(or unless sooner pardoned),” Pinkerton v. … Code 1940, Title 15, Section 369; Glenn v. Glenn, 21 Ala. App. 148 , 106 So. 226 ; Cross v. Willis, 28 Ala.App. 271 , 182 So. 480 ; Hurd v. Troy, 170 Ala. 113 , 54 So. 495 .

Harwell v. State

12 Ala. App. 265 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1915

BROWN, J. … Co. v. McLendon, 63 Ala. 266 ; Carney v. State, 79 Ala. 14 ; Jenkins v. State, 82 Ala. 28 , 2 South. 150 ; James v. State, 104 Ala. 20 , 16 South. 94 ; 1 Mayf. Dig. 337, § 4951/2; Stout’s Mountain Coal & Coke Co. v.