Case law

Ivory v. City of Montgomery

35 Ala. App. 631 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1951

City of Tuscaloosa v. Fitts, supra; Tyler v. Brown-Service Funeral Homes Co., 250 Ala. 295 , 34 So.2d 203 ; Moseley v. Alabama Power Co., 246 Ala. 416 , 21 So.2d 305 ; McSheridan v. … Johnson v. Board of County Road Com’rs of Ontonagon County, 253 Mich. 465 , 235 N.W. 221, 223 .

Potter v. State

44 Ala. App. 376 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1968

The case of Cook v. … Gurley v. State, 36 Ala.App. 606 , 61 So.2d 137 .” In the case of McCall v.

Fiorella v. City of Birmingham

35 Ala. App. 384 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 9, 1950

Brown: You know more than I do—■ “Mr. … Brown v. State, 22 Ala.App. 290 , 115 So. 68 ; Morris v. State, 34 Ala.App. 511 , 42 So.2d 596 . Other points are argued in appellant’s brief. £>ome of these points are governed by principles already discussed.

Evans v. State

38 Ala. App. 45 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1954

Brown deposes: “That he made an affidavit in connection with the case of State v. Doris Evans on the 8th day of September, 1953 before L. C. Walker, Judge of Probate Shelby County, Alabama. … Co. v. Sides, 129 Ala. 399 , 29 So. 798 ; Leith v. State, 206 Ala. 439 , 90 So. 687 ; Dulaney v. Burns, 218 Ala. 493 , 119 So. 21 ; Reed v. L.

Davis v. State

3 Ala. App. 71 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1912

—State v. Murphy, 6 Ala. 845 . The specific pecuniary value is not the main element or the ingredient of the offense .—Newsome v. State, 107 Ala. 133 , 18 South. 206 ; Jackson v. State, 69 Ala. 249 . … —Mar tin v. State, 125 Ala. 64, 71 , 28 South. 92 ; Bates v. State, 152 Ala. 77 , 44 South. 695 . The rulings on the evidence are free from error prejudicial to the defendant, and the case will be affirmed. Affirmed.

Donahey v. City of Montgomery

43 Ala. App. 20 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1965

In McKinstry v. … DuBose v. City of Montgomery, 41 Ala.App. 233 , 127 So.2d 845 ; Brown v. Mayor, etc., of Mobile, 23 Ala. 722 ; Mayor, etc., of Birmingham v. O’Hearn, 149 Ala. 307 , 42 So. 836 ; Barron v.

Clonts v. State

42 Ala. App. 287 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1964

Peek v. State, 39 Ala.App. 198 , 96 So.2d 706 ; Burrow v. State, 147 Ala. 114 , 41 So. 987 ; Brown v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 578 , 44 S.W.2d 721 ; Haines v. State, Fla.App., 113 So.2d 601 ; Williams v. … Carroll v. State, 18 Ala.App. 649 , 94 So. 194 ; Murchison v. State, 32 Ala.App. 427 , 26 So.2d 622 .

Anderson v. State

40 Ala. App. 509 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1959

Brown v. Crashaw, 2 Bulstr. 154; Terry v. State, 25 Ala.App. 135 , 148 So. 157 , holds that a pardon will not cut off enquiry as to a witness’s conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude. See also Mason v. … Brown v. Allen (Speller v. Allen, Daniels v. Allen), 1953, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 417 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . (Habeas corpus denied to examine North Carolina sentences after exhaustion of State procedure.)

May v. State

35 Ala. App. 228 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1950

Couch et al. v. Hutcherson, 243 Ala. 47 , 8 So.2d 580 , 141 A.L.R. 697 ; Green v. State, 233 Ala. 349 , 171 So. 643 ; Brown v. State, 27 Ala.App. 32 , 165 So. 405 ; Nichols v. … The propriety of the refusal of charge 9 is illustrated in: Griffin v. State, 28 Ala.App. 314 , 184 So. 206 ; Parsons v. State, 32 Ala.App. 266 , 25 So.2d 44 ; Brown v. State, 33 Ala.App. 97 , 31 So.2d 670 ; Hall v.

Stewart v. State

35 Ala. App. 288 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 9, 1950

State, 22 Ala.App. 290 , 115 So. 68 ; Gibson v. State, 22 Ala.App. 563 , 117 So. 762 ; Brown v. State, 24 Ala.App. 385 , 135 So. 641 ; Cornelison v. State, 24 Ala.App. 594 , 139 So. 572 ; Brown, Bryant v. … In our case of Brown v.

Johnson v. State

15 Ala. App. 298 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1916

Brown, the father of Lewis Brown [the man alleged to have been murdered] , say his- reputation was bad.’ ” The- only reasonable construction that can be placed on the objection above italicized, when considered in connection … Brown, J., dissenting.

Baker v. State

19 Ala. App. 437 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 1923

Charge 2 is a substantial copy of charge 6 in Brown’s Case, 118 Ala. Ill, 23 South. SI, and should have been given. Charge 4 is a substantial copy of charge 6, refused to defendant in Sherrill v. … Charge 5 was held good in Brown’s Case, supra, but Brown’s Case was expressly overruled in Shelton v. State, 144 Ala. 106 , 42 South. 30 , so far as it holds that this charge should have been given.

Cooper. v. State

43 Ala. App. 385 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1966

Davidson v. State, 33 Ala. 350 . Undoubtedly, it embraces principals and accessories before the fact. Doss v. … Belser v. State, 16 Ala.App. 604 , 79 So. 265 .

Long v. State

42 Ala. App. 476 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1964

Tucker v. State, 2nd Div. 110, post p. 477, 168 So.2d 258 . … The judgment denying habeas corpus is reversed upon the authority of Tucker v.

Hazelton v. State

13 Ala. App. 243 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 13, 1915

—Ex parte Pruitt, 99 Ala. 225 , 13 South. 317 ; State v. Bush, 12 Ala. App. 309 , 68 South. 492 ; Jones v. State, 168 Ala. 108 , 53 South. 286 ; Brown v. … —Brown v. State, 105 Ala. 117 , 16 South. 929 ; Jones v. State, supra. It is no answer that the evidence tends strongly to show that the defendant was guilty.

Seaboard Surety Co. v. First Nat. Bank

34 Ala. App. 437 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1949

Brown: That was all I wanted to know.” Mr. R. A. … Rudisill Soil Pipe Co. v. First National Bank of Anniston, 224 Ala. 436 , 140 So. 569 . See also, Brady on Bank Checks, pp. 270, 271.

Mason v. Bullock

6 Ala. App. 141 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1912

oxen and divers and sundry differences in connection with the proper amount to be credited for the logs cut, charges for merchandise sold by plaintiff to defendant and his hands at plaintiff’s commissary, and. charges for board … House, 15 Ga. 473 ; Davis v. Maxwell, 27 Ga. 368 ; Paulsen v. Manske, 24 Ill. App. 95 ; s. c., 126 Ill. 72 , 18 N. E. 275 , 9 Am. St. Rep. 532 ; Peters v. Craig, 6 Dana (36 Ky.) 307; Brown v.

Glisson v. State

43 Ala. App. 700 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1967

We do not think that inference is sufficient to overcome the testimony of Brown and Harris to the effect that no such offer was tendered, although a request for counsel was made.” Brown v. … Brown, supra, was a coram nobis case wherein the State sought to circumvent Gideon v.

Winn v. State

44 Ala. App. 271 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1968

Brown as maker. … James v. State, 53 Ala. 380 ; Washington v. State, supra; Batson v. State, supra.

Black v. Montgomery

17 Ala. App. 245 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1919

McCay v. … The facts in the case of Brown v. Brown, 2 Ala.