Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersalactapp

2,210 results

0.83s

  • Johnson v. McFry

    14 Ala. App. 170 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1915

    —Lanford & Co. v. Mathis, 9 Ala. … —Smyth v. Tankersley, 20 Ala. 219 , 56 Am. Dec. 193 ; Steiner v. Tranum, 98 Ala. 315 , 13 South. 365 ; Allen v. Harper, 26 Ala. 687 ; Perminter v. Kelly, 18 Ala. 716 , 54 Am. Dec. 177 ; Sullivan v. Lawler, 72 Ala. 74 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ward v. State Ex Rel. Goldsmith

    17 Ala. App. 170 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1919

    Mann v. … It was a claim which the board of revenue and road commissioners had no right to add to or to take from. State ex rel. City of Mobile v. Board of Revenue and Road Commissioners, 180 Ala. 519 , 61 South. 814 . Affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Gulfport Fert. Co. v. Jones

    15 Ala. App. 280 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1916

    BROWN, J. (1) It is made a misdemeanor by our statute for a mortgagor to sell or convey any personal property upon which he has given a written mortgage lien or deed of trust “which is then unsatisfied in whole or in part … This test is supported by Board of Highway Commissioners v. Bloomington, 253 Ill. 164 , 97 N. E. 280 , Ann. Cas. 1913A, 471; Schaeffer v. Miller, 41 Mont. 417 , 109 Pac. 970 , 137 Am. St. Rep. 746 ; Wood v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lowery v. State

    38 Ala. App. 505 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1956

    Cunningham v. State, 14 Ala.App. 1 , 69 So. 982 ; White v. State, 26 Ala.App. 245 , 157 So. 263 ; McDonald v. State, 165 Ala. 85 , 51 So. 629 ; Bluestein v. … Moore v. State, 15 Ala.App. 152 , 72 So. 596 ; Sweeney v. State, 25 Ala.App. 220 , 143 So. 586 ; Horn v. State, 15 Ala. App. 213 , 72 So. 768 ; Kornegay v. State, 33 Ala.App. 338 , 33 So.2d 405 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Stone v. State Ex Rel. Berney

    20 Ala. App. 69 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1924

    Board of Revenue of Jefferson County v. Huey, 195 Ala. 83 , 70 South. 744 ; Covington v. Thompson, 142 Ala. 98 , 38 South. 679 ; Griffin v. Drennen, 145 Ala. 128 , 40 South. 1016 ; Crenshaw v. … City of Mobile v. Board of R. & R. Com.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sherrod v. State

    14 Ala. App. 57 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1916

    BROWN, J. … .—12 Cyc. 221; Butler v. State, supra; Johnson v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Sherrod v. State, 197 Ala. 286 (1916)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Parsons v. State

    33 Ala. App. 309 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1947

    Ex parte Nettles, 58 Ala. 268 ; Ex parte Brown, 65 Ala. 446 ; Ex parte Sloane, 95 Ala. 22 , 11 So. 14 ; Earnest v. State, 21 Ala.App. 534 , 109 So. 613 .” … State, 25 Ala.App. 492 , 149 So. 354 ; Kelly v. State, 31 Ala.App. 194 , 13 So.2d 691 ; Williams v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Scott v. Scott Paper Co.

    43 Ala. App. 532 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1966

    Bagwell Electric Steel Casting Co. v. Director of Industrial Relations, 42 Ala.App. Our statute is sui generis and hence cases such as Swope v. Florida Indus. Commission (Fla.), 159 So.2d 653 , Spaulding v. … Commission (Fla.App.) (1963), 154 So.2d 334 , and Turner v. Brown (La.App.), 165 So.2d 68 [2d Cir.], are not of help.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Whitehead v. Coker

    16 Ala. App. 165 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1917

    BROWN, P. J. This is an action on a promissory note given by the defendant to Drs. … interposed is that such services were rendered by the payee of the note in violation of the criminal statutes prohibiting the practice of medicine by any one who has not obtained a certificate of qualification from the board

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Howle v. State

    15 Ala. App. 185 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

    See Howle v. State , 198 Ala. 701 , 73 So. 1000 .) There is no material difference in the questions presented on this record and in the companion case of Jerome S. Brown v. State of Alabama, infra , 72 So. 757 . … . — See Brown v. State, supra. Affirmed. ON REHEARING. It is complained on an application for rehearing that this case ought not to be affirmed on the authority of the companion case of Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Alabama Power Co. v. Adams

    31 Ala. App. 438 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 23, 1944

    Co. v. Moore, 148 Ala. 63, 67 , 41 So. 984 . … [George] Brown & Co., 91 N.J.L. 412 , 103 A. 28, 30 , Mr.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Clisby v. State

    17 Ala. App. 475 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1920

    James v. State, 15 Ala. App. 569 , 74 South. 395 ; Jeffries v. State, 7 Ala. App. 144 , 62 South. 270 ; Thomas v. State, 109 Ala. 25 , 19 South. 403 ; Sanders v. State, 167 Ala. 85 , 52 South. 417 , 28 L. R. A. (N. … Brown on Saturday, March 29th.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Christison v. State

    41 Ala. App. 192 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1960

    State, 259 Ala. 438 , 66 So.2d 557 , 42 A.L.R.2d 847 (i. e., prohibiting evidence of other crimes), does not apply here: rather the exception illustrated in the false pretense scheme in Brown v. … Thus, in Nix v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Tucker v. State

    41 Ala. App. 104 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1960

    Wells v. State, 31 Ala. App. 383 , 17 So.2d 876 ; Sec. 346, Tit. 13, Code of Alabama 1940. … See Brown v. State 32 Ala. App. 246 , 24 So.2d 450 . The evidence presented below tends to show that several officers went into the Eagle restaurant in Mobile, Alabama, about 12:30 a. m. on a Sunday morning.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Helms v. State

    34 Ala. App. 82 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1948

    “Mr, Brown: We move to exclude the answer. “The Court: Overrule the motion. “Mr. Brown: Save the exception.” Ordinarily a general objection without assigned grounds is unavailing. … Gabriel v. State, 40 Ala. 357 ; Downey v. State, 115 Ala. 108 , 22 So. 479 ; Hale v. State, 20 Ala.App. 270 , 101 So. 774 . See also 6 Ala.Dig., Criminal Law, ^695 (2) for numerous cases enunciating above principles.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Newman v. State

    30 Ala. App. 529 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1942

    In Berry v. … Slayton v. State, 234 Ala. 1 , 173 So. 642 ; Slayton v. State, 234 Ala. 9 , 173 So. 645 , and cases cited. Berry v. State, 231 Ala. 437 , 165 So. 97 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sanford v. City of Clanton

    31 Ala. App. 253 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1943

    Co. v. Doughton, 262 U.S. 413 , 43 S.Ct. 620 , 67 L.Ed. 1051 ; Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board, 297 U.S. 441 , 56 S.Ct. 553 , 80 L.Ed. 791 ; (2) Adams Express Co. v. … Thomas Colliery Co., 260 U.S. 245 , 43 S.Ct. 83 , 67 L.Ed. 237 ; State of Minnesota v. Blasius, 290 U.S. 1 , 54 S.Ct. 34 , 78 L.Ed. 131 ; (4) Brown v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McCary v. State

    39 Ala. App. 642 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1958

    Baker v. State, 19 Ala.App. 437 , 97 So. 901 ; Brown v. State, 32 Ala.App. 131 , 22 So.2d 445 ; McMurtrey v. State, 37 Ala.App. 656 , 74 So.2d 528 ; Mason v. State, 259 Ala. 438 , 66 So.2d 557 , 42 A.L.R.2d 847 . … State, 29 Ala.App. 349 , 197 So. 75 ; Lee v. State, 31 Ala.App. 91 , 13 So.2d 583 ; Brown v. State, 32 Ala.App. 131 , 22 So.2d 445 ; Lee v. State, 246 Ala. 69 , 18 So.2d 706 ; Daniels v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. McFry

    13 Ala. App. 619 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1915

    —Betancourt v. Eberlin, Adm'r, 71 Ala. 461 ; Bibb v. Hall & Farley, 101 Ala. 79, 87 , 14 South. 98 . … of .section 4743 of the Code (Tate v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Holman

    33 Ala. App. 319 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1946

    Georgia Paper Stock Co. v. State Tax Board, 174 Ga. 816 , 164 S.E. 197 ; "or" is a disjunctive particle that marks an alternative generally corresponding to "either" as "either this or that." See 2 Bouv. … Collins v. Whigham, 58 Ala. 438 ; Wilkinson v. Roper, 74 Ala. 140 ; Davis v. Robert, 89 Ala. 402 , 404 , 8 So. 114 , 18 Am.St.Rep. 126 ; Steiner Sons v. Baker, 111 Ala. 374 , 389 , 19 So. 976 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.