Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersalactapp

2,210 results

1.40s

  • Huxford v. Brown

    7 Ala. App. 447 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1913

    possession and exercise of the rights and powers of superintendence and control of convicts sentenced to hard labor for a county which by the terms of that section are conferred upon the court of county commissioners, or board … of revenue, when such convicts are worked or hired in the county where convicted, but otherwise upon the board of inspectors of convicts, are not at all inconsistent with the maintenance, by the hirer of such convicts, of

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    31 Ala. App. 54 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1943

    Officer Lister and myself were patrolling and we passed by Brown’s place. … We arrested them over in Miles Brown’s restaurant or honkytonk. These two men were in there and he was there too. He claimed they were there to collect money for those doors.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    20 Ala. App. 112 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1924

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lindsey v. Brown

    18 Ala. App. 568 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 9, 1922

    Black v. Montgomery, 17 Ala. App. 245 , 84 South. 308 ; Cook v. Echols, 16 Ala. App. 606 , 80 South. 680 . The child in question is 6 years old, being one of 9 living children, the oldest being 11 years old. … The judgment of the judge of probate, awarding the custody and control of the child to petitioner, is reversed, and one here rendered, awarding the custody and control of the child, Ora Dee Brown, to appellant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Brown

    24 Ala. App. 264 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1931

    Cable Co. v. Jones, 133 Ala. 217 , 32 So. 500 . … Byrd v. Jones, ante, p. 65, 130 So. 162 ; Supreme Court Rule 45. The ease was fairly tried, and the judgment ought not to be disturbed. It is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    30 Ala. App. 326 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1941

    Jinright v. State, 220 Ala. 268 , 125 So. 606 . … Vincent v. State, 22 Ala.App. 172 , 113 So. 643 . We observe no error, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    22 Ala. App. 31 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1927

    Lemons & Martin v. State, 50 Ala. 130 . … The case of Perry et al. v. State, 149 Ala. 40 , 43 So. 19 , cited by appellant to sustain their insistence in this connection, is not in point.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    30 Ala. App. 149 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 13, 1941

    The questions of law presented by this appeal are of the same import as those in the appeal of the case of Arnold v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    15 Ala. App. 568 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1917

    Co., etc., v. … See King v. State, 151 Ala. 12 , 44 South. 200 ; Brewer v. State, 113 Ala. 106 , 21 South. 355 ; Wright v. State, 156 Ala. 108 , 47 South. 201 . Reversed and remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    33 Ala. App. 634 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 18, 1948

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    19 Ala. App. 524 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1924

    Lide v. State, 133 Ala. 43, 63 , 31 South. 953 . … Bacon v. U. S. Mut. Acc. Assn., 44 Hun, 599 , 602 (3). “Any substance which,” when introduced into the animal organism, “seriously disturbs or destroys the vital functions.” State v. Baldwin, 36 Kan. 1 , 12 Pac. 318 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    18 Ala. App. 683 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1922

    Yates v. State, ante, p. 435, 93 South. 62 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    23 Ala. App. 427 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1930

    Ward v. State, 19 Ala. App. 398 , 98 So. 208 ; Prater v. State, 107 Ala. 26 , 18 So. 238 . We find nowhere any prejudicial error, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    17 Ala. App. 414 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1920

    In Maisel v. State, 81 South. 348 , 1 this court differentiated the effects between presumptions of law and presumptions of fact. The rule there laid down is applicable here.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Legg

    17 Ala. App. 227 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 11, 1919

    Reed v. Maben, 21 Neb. 696 , 33 N. W. 252 ; Oliver v. Kenny, 173 Ala. 602 , 56 South. 203 . … National Union v. Sherry, Ala. 627, 61 South. 944 ; Francis-Chenoweth Hdw. Co. v. Bailey, 104 Ala. 566 , 18 South. 10 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fenner Beane v. Brown

    28 Ala. App. 624 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1937

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Town of Oneonta

    30 Ala. App. 623 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 19, 1942

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Korrect Klothes, Inc. v. Brown

    22 Ala. App. 678 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1928

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Town of Oneonta

    30 Ala. App. 623 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 19, 1942

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Ace Motor Co.

    30 Ala. App. 479 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1942

    Brown and the police tested the brakes and they were bad. The motor wouldn’t run. … I tested them again while Brown watched and they were bad. He said let the police pay for the bill — they acted smart, so let them pay it.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.