Case law

Alabama Power Co. v. Atkins

36 Ala. App. 558 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1952

The record discloses some contradictions In his testimony at the main trial and that he gave before the Board of Appeals. Mr. Johnston testified that he alone had the authority to grant a leave of absence and that Mr. … Kelly v. Kelly, 247 Ala. 316 , 24 So.2d 265 ; Hale v. Layer, 32 Ala.App. 86 , 22 So.2d 345 . It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment below be reversed and the cause remanded. .Reversed and remanded.

Hall v. State

36 Ala. App. 407 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1952

Brown v. State, 15 Ala.App. 180 , 72 So. 757 ; Cowart v. State, 16 Ala. App. 119 , 75 So. 711 ; Dickerson v. State, 32 Ala.App. 432 , 26 So.2d 627 . In many aspects the evidence is not in; dispute. … See also, Smith v. State, 52 Ala. 407 ; Griffin v. State, 229 Ala. 482 , 158 So. 316 ; Ganus v. State, supra; Caraway v. State, 20 Ala.App. 362 , 101 So. 912 ; Whigham v. State, 20 Ala.App. 129 , 101 So. 98 ; Roberts v.

Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Williams

10 Ala. App. 284 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1914

Co. v. Orr, Adm'r, 121 Ala. 489 , 26 South. 35 ; B. R., L. d P. Co. v. Elmit, 6 Ala. App. 657 , 60 South. 982 . As said in the case of L. & N. R. R. Co. v. … Brown, Adm’r, 121 Ala. 221, 226 , 25 South. 609 , 611, by McClellan, C.

Cromer v. State

36 Ala. App. 540 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1952

In Croom v. State, 71 Ala. 14 , and in Kemp v. … State, 105 Ala. 18 , 16 So. 795 ; Blakeney v.

Baskett Lbr. & Mfg. Co. v. Gravlee

15 Ala. App. 359 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1916

BROWN, J. — It is conceded that the relation of appellant to the transaction out of which this litigation arises is that of guarantor. … .— Walker v. Forbes, supra; Martyn v. Lamar, 75 Iowa 235 , 39 N. W. 285 ; Bank v.

Stephens v. State

36 Ala. App. 444 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1952

Francis v. Imperial Sanitary Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co., 241 Ala. 327 , 2 So.2d 388 ; Camp v. Atlantic Coast Line R. … Co., 251 Ala. 184 , 36 So.2d 331 ; Ex parte United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 215 Ala. 321 , 110 So. 469 .

Hall v. City of Birmingham

20 Ala. App. 437 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1925

Hannibal v. City of Mobile, 16 Ala. App. 625 , 80 So. 629 . With the construction as placed upon the statute by this court, the Legislature by a later enactment, Acts 1923, p. 737, re-enacted that part of the statute. … L. p. 927, § 177; Board of Revenue v. Hewitt, 206 Ala. 405 , 90 So. 781 . There is ample scope for the operation of both statutes, and therefore no conflict in the enactments. Iverson v. State, 52 Ala. 170 .

Lawson v. State

33 Ala. App. 343 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1948

Collins v. State, 14 Ala. 608 ; Quartemas v. State, 48 Ala. 269 ; Hall v. State, 53 Ala. 463 ; Clarke Man. Crim. Pr. § 1546; State v. Crowley, 13 Ala. 172 .” Again, in Walker et al. v. … Brown v. State, 31 Ala.App. 233 , 14 So.2d 596 . However, this case was tried before the court without a jury.

Graham v. State

30 Ala. App. 179 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 20, 1941

Powell v. State, 5 Ala.App. 150 , 59 So. 328 ; Lampley v. State, 6 Ala.App. 23 , 60 So. 415 ; Weldon v. State, 21 Ala.App. 357 , 108 So. 270 , on rehearing. In the Lampley case, supra, this court said [ 6 Ala. … needless to assert this court is not vested with parole or pardoning powers, and the only manner in which these matters could be given further consideration, under the law, woujd be to apply to the State’s Pardon and Parole Board

W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co. v. McCleney

46 Ala. App. 168 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1968

McGuff v. State, 248 Ala. 259 , 27 So.2d 241 .” In Speagle v. … Board of Review, 63 N.J.Super. 75 , 163 A.2d 723 ; and Sangamo Electric Co. v. Donnelly, 26 Ill.2d 348 , 186 N.E.2d 230 .

State v. Town of Springville

23 Ala. App. 343 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1929

Board of Revenue of Jefferson County v. Kayser, 205 Ala. 289 , 88 So. 19 ; Benners v. State, 124 Ala. 97 , 26 So. 942 . The objection that the violation of the ordinance was not a misdemeanor is without merit.

Johnson v. Davis

39 Ala. App. 72 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1957

Code 1940, Title 20, § 2; Bickley v. Keenan & Co., 60 Ala. 293 ; Foxworth v. Brown Bros., 120 Ala. 59 , 24 So. 1 . … See Fogle v.

Williams v. State

7 Ala. App. 104 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1913

court of revenue of Lawrence county purporting to show the establishment of such a district, pursuant to the authority conferred by the act approved February 28, 1881, “to authorize the commissioners’ court, or court or board … Court of County Revenue, 80 Ala. 287 ; Commissioners’ Court of Henry County v. Holland, 176 Ala. —, 58 South. 270 ; Mayfield et al. v. Court of County Commissioners, 148 Ala. 548 ; 41 South. 932 ; Joiner v.

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Gunter

16 Ala. App. 293 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1917

Attorney General v. Gunter, Judge, 11 Ala. App. 399 , 66 South. 844 ; Ex parte Gunter, In re State ex rel. Attorney General v. … White v. State, 134 Ala. 197 , 32 South. 320 ; Ossie v. State, 147 Ala. 152 , 41 South. 945 ; Smith v. State, 149 Ala. 53 , 43 South. 129 ; State v. Megs, 165 Ala. 136 , 51 South. 758 ; Hines v. State, 4 Ala.

Anderson & Co. v. Brammer

4 Ala. App. 596 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 7, 1912

—Peck-Hammond Co. v. Heifner, 136 Ala. 473 , 33 South. 807 , 96 Am. St. Rep. 36 ; Smith v. Davis, 150 Ala. 106 , 43 South. 729 ; Bonifay v. Hassell, 100 Ala. 269 , 14 South. 46 ; Worthington & Co. v. … Co. v. Hurt, 101 Ala. 34, 48 , 13 South. 130 ; Moore v. Crosthwait, 135 Ala. 272 , 33 South. 28 ; Brown v. Fowler, 133 Ala. 310 , 32 South. 584 ; Polly v. McCall, 37 Ala. 20 .

Duncan v. State

30 Ala. App. 356 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1942

Brown v. State, [ 109 Ala. 70 ], 20 So. 103 ; Pierson v. State, 99 Ala. [148], 153, 13 So. 550 ; De Arman v. State, 71 Ala. 351 . … Hardison v.

Moore v. State

35 Ala. App. 95 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1950

Gleason v. State, 6 Ala.App. 49 , 60 So. 518 ; Wiggins v. State, 244 Ala. 246 , 12 So.2d 758 ; Dorgan v. State, 29 Ala.App. 362 , 196 So. 160 ; Hancock v. State, 14 Ala.App. 91 , 71 So. 973 ; Brush v. … We will not attempt to analyze the holdings of the Supreme Court in the cases of Brown v. State, 109 Ala. 70 , 20 So. 103 , and Easley v. State, 246 Ala. 359 , 20 So.2d 519 .

Browning v. State

28 Ala. App. 129 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 1938

Refused charge 19, while a substantial copy of charge 6 in Brown v. State, 118 Ala. 111 , 23 So. 81 , and in Baker v. … Refused charge 28 has been approved as a correct statement of the law in Salm v. State, 89 Ala. 56 , 8 So. 66 ; Gilmore v. State, 99 Ala. 154 , 13 So. 536 ; McCoy v. State, 170 Ala/ 10, 54 So. 428 ; Bailey v.

Sanders v. State

16 Ala. App. 511 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1918

BROWN, P. J. [1] The appellant was jointly indicted with five other named persons for the murder of Chris Edmonds, by shooting him with a gun. … Lewis v. State, supra; Clarke v. State, 117 Ala. 1 , 23 South. 671 , 67 Am. St. Rep. 157 ; White v. State, 84 Ala. 421 , 4 South. 598 ; Harrington v. State, 83 Ala. 9 , 3 South. 425 ; Williams v.

Smith v. State

29 Ala. App. 212 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1940

In the case of McKenney v. … Savage v. State, 20 Ala.App. 97, 100 So. 919 ; Davis v. State, 216 Ala. 475 , 113 So. 393 .