Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersalactapp

2,210 results

1.11s

  • Valley Coal & Lumber Co. v. Hopkins

    32 Ala. App. 522 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1946

    In the case of Rockwood Alabama Stone Co. v. … In the late case of Houser v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Crow v. State

    38 Ala. App. 122 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1955

    Bryan v. State, *123 18 Ala.App. 199 , 89 So. 894 ; Brown v. State, 32 Ala.App. 131 , 22 So.2d 445 . … Davis v. State, 20 Ala.App. 463 , 103 So. 73 ; Ellis v. State, 21 Ala.App. 507 , 109 So. 561 . We do not find any reversible error in the record. The judgment below is ordered affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Higgins

    10 Ala. App. 625 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 1914

    Co. v. Abraham, Bros, 161 Ala. 317 , 49 South. 801 ; Porter v. Martin, 139 Ala. 318 , 35 South. 1006 ; Powell v. State, 5 Ala. App. 150 , 59 South. 328 ; Williams v. State, 6 Ala. App. 16 , 60 South. 416 ; Swain v. … App. 5 , 60 South. 961 ; Nabors v. Brown, et al., 175 Ala. 314 , 57 South. 374 . Appeal dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. State

    16 Ala. App. 635 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1918

    Counsel in argument state: "Judge Brown holds that defendants estopped themselves by making a motion to exclude the evidence on the theory of a variance between the averments and proof. … Scharfenburg v. New Decatur, 155 Ala. 651 , 47 So. 95 ; Argo v. Sylacauga Merc. Co., 12 Ala. App. 442 , 68 So. 534 . The plea of former jeopardy in Pierson v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dyson v. State

    28 Ala. App. 549 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1939

    In Birt v. State, 156 Ala. 29 -37, 46 So. 858 , quoting from Clements v. … The refused ■ charge 13 was held to be good and its refusal reversible error in Fetner v. State, 22 Ala.App. 128 , 113 So. 467 . The holding in the Fetner case, supra, is based upon the decisions in Brown v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. W. M. Dunbar Company

    39 Ala. App. 180 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1957

    Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Snead, 31 Ala.App. 552 , 20 So.2d 118 , certiorari denied 246 Ala. 241 , 20 So.2d 119 ; Davis v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co., 108 Ala. 660 , 18 So. 687 . … Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630 , 9 So. 738 ; Suits v. Glover, 260 Ala. 449 , 71 So.2d 49 , 43 A.L.R.2d 465 ; Pierce v. Floyd, 38 Ala.App. 439 , 86 So.2d 658 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Samples v. State

    15 Ala. App. 667 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1917

    BROWN, P. … Co. v. Kirsch, 150 Ala. 659 , 43 South. 796 ; Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630 , 9 South. 738 ; Dillard v. Savage, 98 Ala. 598 , 13 South. 514 ; Jones v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. McCaulley v. Stone

    27 Ala. App. 439 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1937

    McCaulley v. … “Manifestly, such allowance is not by way of compensation for • new and additional duties imposed by law, defined as ex officio duties, sustained in Tayloe et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eason v. State

    31 Ala. App. 212 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1943

    The case was sufficiently proven by one Campbell, a State’s witness, who was an agent of the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. … Code 1940, Title 29, Sec. 98; Murphy v. State, 27 Ala.App. 204 , 169 So. 24 ; Slaughter v. State, 27 Ala. App. 39 , 167 So. 333 ; Ledbetter v. State, 27 Ala.App. 395 , 173 So. 647 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pratt v. State

    25 Ala. App. 258 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1932

    The appellant claims, under authority of Commissioners Court v. State, 172 Ala. 242 , 55 So. 623 , and Jefferson County Savings Bank v. … In City of Huntsville v. Madison County, 166 Ala. 389 , 52 So. 326, 327 , 139 Am. St. Rep. 45 , the Supreme Court of this state, speaking through Anderson, C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mizell v. State

    41 Ala. App. 36 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1960

    Hulsey v. State, 36 Ala.App. 200 , 54 So.2d 92 ; Hornbuckle v. State, 30 Ala.App. 257 , 4 So.2d 198 ; Eason v. State, supra. … Brown v. Barr, 269 Ala. 497 , 113 So.2d 924 ; McGill v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co., 221 Ala. 614 , 130 So. 379 ; Dulaney v. Burns, 218 Ala. 493 , 119 So. 21 . The judgment is due to be affirmed and it is so ordered.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cox Hat Co. v. Adams

    14 Ala. App. 426 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1915

    BROWN, J. … Rep. 39 ; McFadden & Bro. v. Henderson, et al., 128 Ala. 221 , 29 South. 640 ; Warten v. Strane, 82 Ala. 311 , 8 South. 231 ; Duke v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Brooks

    16 Ala. App. 209 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1916

    *211 BROWN, X [1] Whether the duty of the water company to supply appellee with water arises out of the nature of its business, as one affected with public interest, or out of a contract subsisting between the city of Birmingham … City of Montgomery v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Hudson & Thompson v. Barrett

    16 Ala. App. 278 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1917

    Robbins v. Harrison, 31 Ala. 160 ; Thompson v. Lewis, 31 Ala. 497 . Without the payment of the cash, the title to-the property will not pass. … BROWN, P. J., concurs in the conclusions.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Powell v. State

    33 Ala. App. 323 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1948

    Brown v. State, 120 Ala. 342 , 25 So. 182 . The exhibits were properly admitted over the general grounds of objections interposed thereto. Wilson v. State, 31 Ala.App. 21 , 11 So. 2d 563 . … Hood v. State, 18 Ala.App. 287 , 92 So. 30 ; Carrington v. State, 32 Ala. App. 596 , 28 So.2d 814 ; Title 14, Sec. 14, Code 1940. In the case of Hardis v. State, 28 Ala.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Duncan v. State

    42 Ala. App. 111 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1963

    From the above quoted excerpt from the final judgment, there is no occasion for consideration of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 , because no testimony appears to have been taken. … This request is based on Act No. 62 of September 15, 1961, the Griffin v. Illinois statute. Case No. 5940 referred to therein appears to be the cause which lead to Duncan’s-conviction.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • De Bardeleben v. Sellers

    17 Ala. App. 247 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1919

    Harmon v. State, 166 Ala. 28 , 52 South. 348 ; Fergusson v. State, 149 Ala. 21 , 43 South. 16 . … There was nothing to connect the plaintiff with the conversations between the juror and the witness or with the fact that the juror boarded with the witness.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. State

    11 Ala. App. 168 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 14, 1914

    Co. v. … Ev. 906; 40 Cyc. 2359; Hoy v. Morris, 13 Gray (Mass.) 519 , 14 Am. Dec. 650 ; State v. Hoyt, 47 Conn. 518 , 36 Am. Rep. 89 ; State v. Allen, 37 La. Ann. 685 ; People v. Cotta, 49 Cal. 166 ; Com. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Boutwell

    16 Ala. App. 626 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1918

    *627 BROWN, P. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Hennies

    33 Ala. App. 377 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1948

    Winkler Brokerage Co. v. Courson, 160 Ala. 374 , 49 So. 341 . In Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. … Commissioners’ Court of Lowndes County v. Hearne, supra; Town of Camden v. Bloch, supra; Cook et al. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.