Case law

Ex parte Lane

12 Ala. App. 232 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1914

The statement of facts on which the case was disposed of by the judge of the county court shows that Traweek, the acting city recorder, was acting by authority of an appointment made by the president of the board of city … —Drinkard v. Oden, 150 Ala. 475 , 43 South. 578 ; Cooley on Constitutional Limitations, 80, 81; Wood v. Wood, 134 Ala. 557 , 33 South. 347 ; Bray v. State, 140 Ala. 172 , 37 South. 250 .

City of Mobile v. Mobile Electrical Supply Co.

6 Ala. App. 131 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1912

Even if it be true that the plaintiff could not recover on a. contract because the city authorities with whom it dealt were not authorized to bind the municipality, and the aldermanic board as such, which only would have … Deposit, 174 Ala. 179 , 56 South. 802 ; Allen v. La Fayette, 89 Ala. 641 , 8 South. 30 , 9 L. R. A. 497; Marsh v. Fulton County, 10 Wall. 676 , 19 L. Ed. 1040 ; Louisiana v. Wood, 102 U. S. 294 ; 26 L.

Studdard v. State

14 Ala. App. 33 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1916

BROWN, J. (1) It has been repeatedly ruled that on trial under an indictment charging the defendant with selling, keeping for sale, or otherwise disposing of prohibited liquors it is competent for the state to show more, … —Spigener v. State, 11 Ala. App. 296 , 66 South. 896 ; Allison v. State, 1 Ala.

Union Cemetery Co. v. Alexander

14 Ala. App. 217 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1915

BROWN, J. This is an action of trespass on the case for wrongfully interfering with the right of sepulture in the Union Cemetery, located negtr Woodlawn, Ala. … —Shannon v.

Montgomery Production Credit Ass'n v. M. Hohenberg & Co.

31 Ala. App. 117 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1943

Christian Benevolent Burial Ass’n v. Huff, 241 Ala. 119 , 1 So.2d 390 ; 2 Am.Jur., p. 350, Sec. 442. So, appositely, paraphrasing the observation of Mr. Justice Brown in Christian Benev. Burial Ass’n v. … Supreme Court Rule 45, Code 1940, tit. 7, appendix; Pair v. Rice, 23 Ala.App. 187 , 122 So. 297 ; Miller v. *120 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 214 Ala. 4 , 106 So. 335 ; Williford v. Atlantic Coast Line R.

Booker T. Washington Ins. Co. v. Crocker

36 Ala. App. 273 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1951

Manhattan Life Insurance Company v. Verneuille, 156 Ala. 592 , 47 So. 72 ; Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Bryan, 33 Ala.App. 294 , 33 So.2d 25 . Defendant introduced testimony by C. J. … Co. v. Brown, 27 Ala.App. 602 , 177 So. 178 ; All States Life Ins. Co. v. Steward, 242 Ala. 258 , 5 So.2d 784 .

Williams v. State

13 Ala. App. 133 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1915

BROWN, J. (1) It is elementary that when a person does an act legally wrong in itself, and the accomplished act is- a crime, the law will presume the criminal intent from the act. —Dotson v. State, 62 Ala. 145 , 34 Am. … —Gater v.

York v. State

34 Ala. App. 188 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1948

Martin v. State, 31 Ala.App. 86 , 13 So.2d 203 ; Brown v. State, 16 Ala.App. 29 , 75 So. 174 ; Wells v. State, 131 Ala. 48 , 31 So. 572 . … Hines v. Paden, 204 Ala. 592 , 87 So. 88 ; Elmore v. State, 21 Ala.App. 410 , 109 So. 114 ; Hanners v. State, 147 Ala. 27 , 41 So. 973 ; Barney v. State, 5 Ala.App. 302 , 57 So. 598 ; Roden v.

Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Shirley

20 Ala. App. 473 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1925

Taylor v. Powers, 3 Ala. 285 . … Board of Education, 197 Ala. 617 , 73 So. 321 .

Parker-Blake Co. v. Ladd

14 Ala. App. 407 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1915

Brown Shoe Co., 114 Ala. 309 , 21 South. 1009 ; Pelham v. Chattahoochee Co., 146 Ala. 216 -220, 41 South. 12 , 8 L. R. A. [N. S.] 448, 119 Am. St. … —Maxwell v. Brown Shoe Co., supra; Pelham v. Chattahoochee Co. (two cases), supra. (5) There is no merit in the contention that the bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence.

Ekornes v. City of Mobile

34 Ala. App. 159 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1948

guilty in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Mobile of violating Section 139 of the Mobile City Ordinances, pertaining to the sale of alcoholic beverages without a license first obtained from the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board … Jackson v. City of Mobile, Ala.App., 30 So.2d 40 ; Gentle v. City of Huntsville, 26 Ala.App. 374 , 60 So. 273 . See also 15 Alabama Dig., Municipal Corporations, 642(1), for numerous other cases. Affirmed.

Hickman v. State

12 Ala. App. 22 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1915

BROWN, J. It is an ancient rule of the law that a party cannot directly impeach the character of his own witness for the purpose of discrediting testimony given by the witness and with which the party is dissatisfied. … —White v. State, 87 Ala. 26 , 5 South. 829 ; Hemingway v. Garth, 51 Ala. 530 ; Thomas v. State, 117 Ala. 178 , 23 South. 665 ; Schieffelin v. Schieffelin, 127 Ala. 35 , 28 South. 687 ; Southern Bell Telephone Co. v.

Knight v. Harris, Cortner & Co.

16 Ala. App. 290 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1917

BROWN, P. J. [1] There seems to be no controversy as to the terms of the agreement between the parties under which the cotton in controversy was delivered to the defendant. … Cloke v. Shafroth, 137 Ill. 393 , 27 N. E. 302 , 31 Am. St. Rep. 380 ; Carlisle v. Wallace, 12 Ind. 252 , 74 Am. Dec. 208 ; Barnes v. McCrea, 75 Iowa, 267 , 39 N. W. 122 , 9 Am. St. Rep. 475 ; Ledyard v.

Sanford v. State

23 Ala. App. 58 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1929

Porter & Co. v. State, 58 Ala. 66 ; Bibb v. State, 83 Ala. 84, 90 , 3 So. 711 ; Robinson v. State ex rel. James, 212 Ala. 459, 461 , 102 So. 693 ; Thompson v. State, 19 Ala. App. 328 , 97 So. 258 ; Folmar v. … , under which appellant was tried, regularly charging him with the offense of treating, or offering to treat, diseases of human beings in this state, without having obtained a certificate of qualification from the state board

Savage v. State

12 Ala. App. 116 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1915

—Mouton v. L. & N. R. R. co., 128 Ala. 537 , 29 South. 602 ; Wilson v. State, 136 Ala. 114 , 33 South. 831 . … —Hinds v. State, 55 Ala. 145 ; Simpson v. State, 111 Ala. 6 , 20 South. 572 ; Savage v. State, supra.

Fowlkes v. Lewis

10 Ala. App. 543 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1914

Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co. v. … In McLeod v.

Savage v. State

18 Ala. App. 299 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1921

Everage v. State, 14 Ala. App. 106 , 71 So. 983 ; Moore V. State, 71 Ala. 307 ; Brown v. State, 105 Ala. 117 , 16 So. 929 ; Willis v. State, 134 Ala. 450 , 33 So. 226 . In Buchanan v. State. 10 Ala. … James v. State, 53 Ala. 380 ; Whitten v. Graves, 40 Ala. 578 ; Norman v. State, 13 Ala. App. 337 , 69 So. 362 ; Oliveri v. State, 13 Ala. App. 348 , 69 So. 359 .

Smith v. Lineville Nat. Bank

21 Ala. App. 65 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1925

Crothers, Adm’r, v. Lee, 29 Ala. 337 ; Knotts v. Tarver, 8 Ala. 743 ; Hudson & C. Co. v. Vaughn, 57 Ala. 609 . … Crothers v. Lee, 29 Ala. 337 . 2.

Tucker v. State

34 Ala. App. 477 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 24, 1949

The principles dictating such ruling are now well settled and are set forth in detail in the case of State v. … State v. Smith, supra. It appears from the record that the respondent did not rest at this point, as he might well have done, but proceeded to introduce further evidence.

Cooper & Sons Motor Co. v. Klepsig

24 Ala. App. 297 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1930

Hall Brown Woodworking Machine Co. v. Haley Furniture Mfg. Co. et al., 174 Ala. 190 , 197 , 56 So. 726 , 728 , L.R.A. 1918B, 924 . Or, as emphasized by Mr. … Bank v. Allen, 100 Ala. 476 , 14 So. 335 , 27 L.R.A. 426 , 46 Am. St. Rep. 80 ."