Case law

Wilbanks v. State

42 Ala. App. 39 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1962

. § 6, People v. Abbott, 47 Cal.2d 362 , 303 P.2d 730 ; Barber v. State, 191 Md. 555 , 62 A.2d 616 ; Commonwealth v. Sazama, 339 Mass. 154 , 158 N.E.2d 313 ; State v. … Browning v. State, 31 Ala.App. 137 , 13 So.2d 54 ; Dyson v. State, 26 Miss. 362 ; Hudson v. State, 3 Cold. (43 Tenn.) 355. The trial judge’s discretion on relevancy is subject to the rule of law.

King v. State

15 Ala. App. 67 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1916

BROWN, J. … .— Weaver v. State, 77 Ala. 26 ; Dozier v. State, 130 Ala. 57 , 30 South. 396 .

City of Gadsden v. Roadway Express, Inc.

37 Ala. App. 613 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1954

Ozark Pipe Line Corp. v. Monier, supra. As to the Joseph case, supra, in Sanford Service Co. v. … In Memphis Natural Gas Co. v.

Ala. Great So. R. R. Co. v. Stewart

15 Ala. App. 466 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1917

Co. v. Douglas, et al., 167 Ala. 286 , 52 South. 414 ; South. Ry. Co. v. Dickens, 161 Ala. 144 , 49 South. 766 ; Tinney v. C. of Ga. Ry. … Co. v.

Wilder v. Tatum

15 Ala. App. 474 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1917

BROWN, J. The appellant exchanged a telephone plant and system with the appellee for certain real estate, each executing to the other a conveyance with warranty of title to the property conveyed free from incumbrance. … —Kingsberry v. Milner, 69 Ala. 502 ; Copeland v. McAdory, 100 Ala. 560 , 13 South. 545 .

DuBose v. State

15 Ala. App. 233 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1916

BROWN, J. (1) The appellant seeks to show by ex parte affidavits that he was not in court when the sentence of the court *234 was pronounced against him. … Co. v. Canterbury, 169 Ala. 444 , 53 South. 823 . (2) .

Christison v. State

39 Ala. App. 175 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1957

Arnett v. State, 225 Ala. 8 , 141 So. 699 ; Payne v. State, 226 Ala. 69 , 145 So. 650 ; Mitchell v. State, 244 Ala. 503 , 14 So.2d 132 ; Lynn v. State, 250 Ala. 384 , 34 So.2d 602 ; Bradford v. … In Williams v.

Dowdell v. Beasley

17 Ala. App. 100 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1919

BROWN, P. … Roman v.

Ross Neely Motor Express, Inc. v. Robinson

35 Ala. App. 431 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1950

Bingham v. Davidson, 141 Ala. 551 , 37 So. 738 ; Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Hamilton, Adm’r, 135 Ala. 343 , 33 So. 157 ; Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineers v. … Garrett v. State, 248 Ala. 612 , 29 So.2d 8 ; Slayton v. State, 234 Ala. 9 , 173 So. 645 ; Brown v. State, 33 Ala.App, 152, 31 So.2d 652 ; Salvadori v. State, 33 Ala.App. 372 , 33 So.2d 752 ; Webb v.

Bruner v. State

16 Ala. App. 480 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1918

BROWN, P. J. The indictment charges that defendant unlawfully, wantonly, or maliciously killed, disabled, disfigured, destroyed, or injured three hogs, the property of John Leroy. … This ruling is in accord with the holding in Thompson v. State, 67 Ala. 106 , 42 Am. Rep. 101 ; Johnson v. Patterson, 14 Conn. 1 , 35 Am. Dec. 96 . This disposes of the only question presented by this appeal. Affirmed.

Lusco v. Jackson

27 Ala. App. 531 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1937

Bains v. Dank, 199 Ala. 250 , 74 So. 341 . … Brown v. Dwight Mfg. Co., 200 Ala. 376 , 76 So. 292 , L.R.A.1917F, 997.

International Shoe Co. v. Dodd

26 Ala. App. 46 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1933

Even so — which we do not admit is shown to be true — as a matter of fact, and law (see Hall & Brown Woodworking Machine Co. v. *47 Haley Fur. & Mfg. Co. et al., 174 Ala. 190 , 56 So. 726 . L. R.

Reed v. State

18 Ala. App. 371 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1922

Acts 1909, p. 317; Acts 1919, pp. 1039, 1042; Harris v. State, 203 Ala. 200 , 82 South. 450 ; Blevins v. State, 204 Ala. 476 , 85 South. 817 ; Savage v. State, 174 Ala. 94 , 57 South. 469 ; Jones v. State, 16 Ala. … App. 7 , 74 South. 843 ; Brown v. State, 109 Ala. 70 , 20 South. 103 .

Department of Industrial Relations v. Wall

34 Ala. App. 530 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1949

Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. Green, 75 Ohio App. 526 , 62 N.E.2d 756, 759 . Writing for the Supreme Court in Department of Industrial Relations v. … Department of Industrial Relations v. Tomlinson, supra; Fiquett v. Wade *534 Electric Light & Power Co., 206 Ala. 630 , 91 So. 357 . Appellee’s counsel makes complaint in brief that there are no assignments of error.

Stephens v. International Harvester Co.

16 Ala. App. 612 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1918

BROWN, P. … Dilworth v. Holmes Furn. & Vehicle Co., 183 Ala. 608 , 62 South. 812 ; Tompkins v. Monticello Cotton Oil Co. (C.

Bates v. Louisville N. R. Co.

21 Ala. App. 176 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1925

It is insisted on the part of appellee that this court cannot consider the action of the trial court in giving the general charge as to count B, for the reason that a diagram of the locus in quo was drawn on a black board … R. v. Benns, 189 Ala. 590 , 66 So. 589 ; Warble v. Sulzberger, 185 Ala. 603 , 64 So. 361 ; S. S. Co. v. Redd, 6 Ala. App. 404 , 60 So. 468 .

Tarrant v. Bessemer National Bank

7 Ala. App. 285 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1912

Board of Rev., 71 Ala. 413 ; People v. Weaver, 100 U. S. 539 , 25 L. Ed. 705 ; Farmer’s Nat. Bank v. Dearing, supra. … Board of Rev., 71 Ala. supra; and even by State v. Stonewall Fire Ins. Co., 89 Ala., supra.

McColston v. State

20 Ala. App. 591 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1925

Rowe v. State (Ala. … Rep. 582 (quoted in Rowe v. State, supra). In deciding this insistence here however, we must perforce hold under the authority of Gardner v. State, 17 Ala. App. 589 , 87 So. 885 ; Gardner v.

Everage v. State

14 Ala. App. 106 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 18, 1916

—Moore v. State, 71 Ala. 307 ; Brown v. State, 105 Ala. 117 , 16 South. 929 ; Willis v. State, 134 Ala. 450 , 33 South. 226 . (5, 6) The next question for consideration is: Was the instrument the subject of forgery? … —Murphy v. State, 118 Ala. 137 , 23 South. 719 ; Burden v. State, 120 Ala. 388 , 25 South. 190 , 14 Am. St. Rep. 37 .” Dudley v. State, 10 Ala. App. 130, 135 , 64 South. 534, 535 . *109 In Rembert v.

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mason

4 Ala. App. 353 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 7, 1912

—Parish v. Wheeler, 22 N. Y. 49 4;Smtih v. Hance, 11 N. J. Law. 244; Persons v. Hight, 4 Ga. 474 . According to Webster, “refuse” means to “decline to accept; to reject.” … The evidence also shows without dispute that the appellee was drinking when he boarded the train and when he was ejected.