Case law

Geeter v. State

35 Ala. App. 207 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1950

Brown v. State, 20 Ala.App. 39 , 100 So. 616 .

White v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States

24 Ala. App. 328 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1931

Co. v. Bledsoe, 52 Ala. 538 ; Watts v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 211 Ala. 404 , 100 So. 812 . … Brown v. Commercial Fire Insurance Co., 86 Ala. 189 , 5 So. 500 ; Andrews v. Hall et. al., 132 Ala. 320 , 31 So. 356 . Affirmed.

Lawson v. State

36 Ala. App. 438 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1952

Hall v. State, 19 Ala.App. 229 , 96 So. 644 ; Raines v. State, 147 Ala. 691 , 40 So. 932 ; Weaver v. State, 33 Ala.App. 207 , 31 So.2d 593 ; Green v. State, 233 Ala. 349 , 171 So.. 643; Bigham v. … See also, Falkner v. State, 151 Ala. 77 , 44 So. 409 ; Thomas Furnace Co. v. Carroll, 204 Ala. 263 , 85 So. 455 ; Lester v. Jacobs, 212 Ala. 614 , 103 So. 682 ; Redus v. State, 243 Ala. 320 , 9 So.2d 914 ; Brown v.

Gilliam v. State

38 Ala. App. 420 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1955

Reynolds v. State, 24 Ala.App. 249 , 134 So. 815, 816 ; Graham v. State, 27 Ala. App. 505 , 176 So. 382 ; Jones v. State, 33 Ala.App. 451 , 34 So.2d 483 .” Gurley v. State, 36 Ala.App. 606 , 61 So.2d 137, 139 . … Brown v. State, 243 Ala. 529 , 10 So.2d 855 . *423 There being no reversible error in the record the judgment of the trial court is' affirmed. Affirmed.

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Germany

27 Ala. App. 595 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1937

Birmingham News Co. v. Browne, 228 Ala. 414 , 153 So. 889 ; Wells v. Henderson Land & Lbr. Co., 200 Ala. 262 , 76 So. 28 , L.R.A.1918A, 115; Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. … Self, 192 Ala. 403 , 68 So. 328 , L.R.A.1915F, 516; Hardeman v. Williams, 169 Ala. 50 , 53 So. 794 ; Palos Coal & Coke Co. v. Benson, 145 Ala. 664 , 39 So. 727 ; Goodloe v. M. & C. R. R.

Bell v. State

36 Ala. App. 390 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1952

Brown arrived at the store in a grocery truck. The former was employed to assist in delivering the groceries. The vehicle parked at the front of the store building and in close proximity thereto. Mr. … Tunstill v. State, 33 Ala.App. 460 , 34 So.2d 857 ; Pitts v. State, 33 Ala.App. 363 , 33 So.2d 751 ; Wade v. State, 17 Ala.App. 371 , 84 So. 858 ; McMickens v. State, 16 Ala.App. 78 , 75 So. 626 ; Mitchell v.

Gandy v. City of Birmingham

31 Ala. App. 313 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1943

Lovett v. … V. Lightfoot without license or authority from the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board of Alabama, it would be your duty to find the defendant guilty.”

Kennedy v. State

39 Ala. App. 676 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1958

State, 37 Ala.App. 689 , 74 So.2d 727 ; and it should be borne in mind that § 1 of T. 29 must be construed in pari materia with § 93, where and to the extent pertinent, see Brown v. … State, 218 Ala. 250 , 118 So. 265 (Brown, J., dissenting); Ex parte Flowers, 218 Ala. 257 , 118 So. 462 (Brown, J., dissenting). The dictum in Larkin v.

Evans v. State

17 Ala. App. 155 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1919

BROWN, P. J. [1] This is the second ap peal in this case. Evans v. … Cox v.

Phelps v. State

16 Ala. App. 161 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 29, 1917

BROWN, P. J. [1] The state’s witness . … Co. v. Friedman, 187 Ala. 570 , 65 South. 939 ; Bonner v. State, 107 Ala. 106 , 18 South. 226 ; Addington v.

Wood v. State

37 Ala. App. 673 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1954

Page v. State, 17 Ala.App. 70 , 81 So. 848 ; Patty v. State, 242 Ala. 304 , 6 So.2d 399 ; Brown v. State, 249 Ala. 5 , 31 So.2d 681 ; Pouncey v. State, 24 Ala.App. 326 , 136 So. 741 ; Swinney v. … Borden & Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lbr. Co., 7 Ala.App. 335 , 62 So. 245 ; Woodard v. State, 253 Ala. 259 , 44 So.2d 241 .

Herring v. State

14 Ala. App. 93 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1916

—Fuller v. … —Rag land v.

Bates v. Kurtts

36 Ala. App. 350 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1951

See also, Karrh v. Brown, 35 Ala.App. 308 , 46 So.2d 430 ; Armstrong v. Sellers, 182 Ala. 582 , 62 So. 28 ; Parker v. Wilson, 179 Ala. 361 , 60 So. 150 , 43 L.R.A.,N.S., 87; Bradley v. … Brown, supra, followed what we considered the view in our jurisdiction and denied liability against the husband and owner of the car. At the time of the collision Mrs.

Rogers v. State

12 Ala. App. 196 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1915

BROWN, J. … —Gandy v.

Morris v. State

43 Ala. App. 660 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1967

Cazales v. Bridges, 38 Ala.App. 232 , 81 So.2d 913 . The doctrine of the Freeman case is not applicable here. … See also Boothe v. State, 43 Ala.App. 119 , 180 So.2d 450 , and cases cited.

Spruce v. State

43 Ala. App. 487 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1966

The pan was badly stained with a brown residue around the edges. There were tiny traces of morphine in the stains but the amount present was too small to measure. … The statement was not inadmissible under Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 ; 84 S.Ct. 1758 , 12 L.Ed.2d 977 ; Mathis v. State, 280 Ala. 16 , 189 So.2d 564 ; Lokos v.

H. C. Schrader Co. v. A. Z. Bailey Groc. Co.

15 Ala. App. 647 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1917

BROWN, P. … The case of Frith & Co. v. Hollan, 133 Ala. 583 , 32 South. 494 , 91 Am. St.

Coates v. State

1 Ala. App. 35 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1911

—Kirby v. State, 151 Ala. 66 , 44 South. 38 ; Smith v. State, 142 Ala. 14 , 39 South. 329 ; Harrison v. State, 144 Ala. 20 , 40 South. 568 ; Gilmore v. State, 126 Ala. 20 , 28 South. 595 . … —Brown v. State, 150 Ala. 25 , 43 South. 194 ; Pitts v. State, 140 Ala. 70 , 37 South. 101 .

Gilbreath v. State

15 Ala. App. 588 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1917

BROWN, P. J. … The same legislative intent is manifest in the provisions of section 6301, Code 1907. — Williams v. State, 4 Ala. App. 92, 58 , South. 925; Garrett v. State, 109 Ind. 527 , 10 N. E. 570 ; State v.

Gurley v. Henderson Nat. Bank

21 Ala. App. 569 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1926

Lomax v. Le Grand, 60 Ala. 537 ; Wilson v. Stewart, 69 Ala. 302 . The demurrer to the first count of the complaint was properly sustained. The defendant was denying notice or facts from -which notice could be implied. … It is conceded by appellant in his excellent brief that, if the law is as is stated in Foxworth v. Brown, 120 Ala. 59 , 24 So. 1 , then the court committed no error. The contention is that in Hawkins v.